全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Developing a Methodology for Determining Design and Operating Requirements for Contracting Tunnel Works

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104741, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Material Experiment, Composite Material

Keywords: Tunnel Safety, Tunnel Operation, Tunnel Maintenance, Cost Benefit Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Directive 2004/54/EC [1] on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network sets the bases for establishing an acceptable safety level for tunnel users across EU member states. Furthermore, many EU member states enforce stricter safety requirements for tunnels in their territory. The lack of a methodology for determining design and operating requirements for tunnels leads many times to an expensive over-design for tunnel works and thereafter operation and maintenance, throughout the tunnel lifetime without the expected increase in safety levels. In the present paper a methodology has been developed in order to assist all parties involved in contracting tunnel works to establish the optimum design and operating requirements. The methodology combines results of risk analysis with cost benefit analysis in different time periods throughout the tunnel design life. The results from implementing the aforementioned methodology include the optimum set of design and operating requirements for each tunnel under consideration. Concluding, the necessary contribution of each beneficiary to the funding of the different sets of design and operating requirements for certain time periods throughout tunnel lifetime, is soundly estimated and justified. The proposed methodology is an excellent tool since it can be used regardless of specific risk acceptance criteria.

Cite this paper

Vagiokas, N. (2018). Developing a Methodology for Determining Design and Operating Requirements for Contracting Tunnel Works. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4741. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104741.

References

[1]  European Parliament and Council (2004) Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on Minimum Safety Requirements in the Trans-European Road Network. Official Journal of the European Union, L167, 39-91.
[2]  Goncalves, N., et al. (2007) Risk Analysis for Road Tunnels. World Road Association, Paris.
[3]  OECD (2001) Safety in Tunnels. Transport of Dangerous Goods through Road Tunnels. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
[4]  Vagiokas, N. and Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M. (2004) Developing a Framework for Assessing Risks Involved in the Transportation of Dangerous Goods. 11th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Prague, 31 May-3 June 2004, 1072-1083.
[5]  Welte, U., Wierer, A. and Buraczynski, J. (2016) Best Practice for Life Cycle Analysis for Tunnel Equipment. World Road Association, Paris.
[6]  ERSO (2008) Cost Benefit Analysis. European Road Safety Observatory, Brussels.
[7]  Elvik, R. (2001) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Road Safety Measures: Applicability and Controversies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 9-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00010-5
[8]  Walet, F., et al. (2012) Assessing and Improving Safety in Existing Road Tunnels. World Road Association, Paris.
[9]  Aurand, V., Vagiokas, N., et al. (2017) Road Tunnel Operations: First Steps towards a Sustainable Approach. World Road Association, Paris.
[10]  Van der Auwera, K., et al. (2016) Lay Bys and Protection against Lateral Obstacles—Current Practices in Europe. World Road Association, Paris.
[11]  Welte, U., et al. (2004) Cross Section Design for Bi-Directional Road Tunnels. World Road Association, Paris.
[12]  FHA (2001) European Road Lighting Technologies. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington.
[13]  Welte, U., et al. (2001) Cross Section Design for Unidirectional Road Tunnels. World Road Association, Paris.
[14]  Hejny, H. (2008) Prevention, Detection and Monitoring: Existing Detection and Monitoring Systems. Upgrading of Existing Tunnels: UPTUN, Germany.
[15]  Bendelius, A., et al. (2007) Systems and Equipment for Fire and Smoke Control in Road Tunnels. World Road Association, Paris.
[16]  Sakkas, K.M., Vagiokas, N.D., et al. (2017) In Situ Fire Test to Assess Tunnel Lining Fire Resistance. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2017—Surface Challenges—Underground Solutions, Bergen, 9-15 June 2017, 2840-2947.
[17]  Lacroix, D. and Haack, A. (2004) PIARC Design Criteria for Resistance to Fire for Road Tunnel Structures. Route Roads, 324, 64-71.
[18]  Haack, A. (2006) Fire in Tunnels: Design Fire Scenarios. Thematic Network Fire in Tunnels, WTCB, Brussels.
[19]  Brekelmans, J. (2008) Promotion, Dissemination, Education/Training and Socioeconomic Impact. Upgrading of Existing Tunnels: UPTUN, The Netherlands.
[20]  Hellenic Republic (2001) Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Dangerous Goods Transportation through Road Tunnels According to Presidential Decree 230/2007. Ministry of Infrastructure, Transportation and Utilities, Athens.
[21]  Vagiokas, N., Bletsas, A. and Nelisse, R.M.L. (2013) Methodological Approaches for Tunnels Classification According to ADR Agreement. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2013—Underground—The Way to the Future, Geneva, 31 May-7 June 2013, 314-320.
https://doi.org/10.1201/b14769-45

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413