All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

From Enlightenment to Cyborgs

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104033, PP. 1-46

Subject Areas: History, Sociology, Anthropology

Keywords: Enlightenment Homme Nouveau, Enlightenment Naturophilus & Technophilus Soul, Man-Machine Integration Process, Progressive Techno-Scientism, Secular Religion, Eugenics, Academic/Industrial/Military Iron Triangle

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The decline of the feudal system and the progressive rise of the medieval bourgeoisie to power roles and government functions, leads the West (17th century) to theorize and assume a materialistic, reductionist and mechanistic model of thought, based on a privileged, tendentially exclusive, relationship with Science (Galilean scientific method), technique and technology. This paper takes into account the historical, sociological, and anthropological elements (such as the unlimited perfectibility of humanity advocated by the French Enlightenment and the mechanization of the production cycle envisaged by English pro-to-liberalism) of this paradigmatic revolution, which more than others help us understanding the causal process that led to contemporary techno-centrism 4.0. It is highlighted that thanks to the interweaving between the ideals of the French Enlightenment, with its two souls (Naturophilus and Technophilus), and the Anglo-Saxon entrepreneurial foresight (proved successful with the Industrial Revolution 1.0), takes shape the Positivist paradigm, and with it the Positivist secular religion, whose affirmation and diffusion generate a stream of widely shared thought throughout the West, i.e. Eugenics, which radicalizes the most ambivalent (pseudo-scientific) and reactionary (philocolonialist) instances of Enlightenment and Positivism, leading to a series of crimes against the person and against humanity, which will result in the mass eliminations conducted, in particular but not only, by Nazi-fascism and Stalinism (two totalitarian regimes that share the same Positivist roots and the same passion for Eugenics thought). It is highlighted that the heart of the industrialization process begins to throb in factories, where the introduction of mechanical systems into the production cycle triggers the man-machine integration process, which soon becomes the ful-crum, the economic, social and cultural driving factor of the western civilization. It will be thanks to the evolution of the mechanical systems employed in the production chains and to the establishment of the Liberalist economic model, that between the second and third Industrial Revolution consolidates the alliance between academic, industrial and military (the academic/industrial/military iron triangle). An alliance destined to play a decisive role in the two World Wars of the 20th century and in all subsequent warfare. The present paper therefore highlights how the two World Wars have exponentially increased western scientific and technological development, which once transferred from the military to the civilian sector, has taken off the Industrial Revolution 3.0. Thanks to the Second World War, the US academic/industrial/military iron triangle is strengthened and becomes the world leader in scientific, military, economic and technological development. The computerization of society and the development of so-called Artificial Intelligence are side effects of the new way of conceiving the integrated relationship between soldier and armament, matured in the US military sector during World War II. The soldier-armament automation model that emerged from that war experience, and the enormous technical and technological developments that have taken place, paved the way for the creation of man-machine hybrids (cyborgs) and for the robotization of society (Industrial Revolution 4.0), intended to be a complementary effect of contemporary warfare. In conclusion, the birth of a neo-positivist secular religion, inspired by a scientific and hermaphroditic divinity, called Universal Consciousness, is contemplated.

Cite this paper

Messori, C. (2017). From Enlightenment to Cyborgs. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e4033. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104033.

References

[1]  Messori, C. (2015) Quale Modello per le Neuroscienze-Part. I of III. [Which Model for Neuroscience.] Il Minotauro, Persiani Editore, Bologna, 1, 25-45.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278414562_Quale_
Modello_per_le_Neuroscienze
[2]  Rose, F. (1984) Into the Heart of the Mind: An American Quest for Artificial Intelligence. Harper & Row, New York, 36.
[3]  Wiener, N. (1954) Men, Machines, and the World About. In: Galderston, I., Ed., Medicine and Science, New York Academy of Medicine and Science, International Universities Press, New York, 13-28.
http://21stcenturywiener.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Men-
Machines-and-the-World-About-by-N.-Wiener.pdf
[4]  Dennis, M.A. (2000) Vannevar Bush. American Engineer, Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vannevar-Bush#ref192589
[5]  Mosse, G.L. (2003) Il razzismo in Europa. [Racism in Europe. From Origins to Holocaust.] Dalle origini all’olocausto, Editori Laterza, Roma-Bari, 18.
[6]  Messori, C. (2012) Dalla Facoltà Acustico-Musicale alle Origini del Linguaggio Orale Fino al Predominio della Cavità Orale che Genera il Mondo sulla Cavità Uterina che Genera la Vita. [From the Acoustic-Musical Faculty to Oral Language Origins, up to the Predominance of Oral Cavity Which Generates the World on the Uterine Cavity Which Generates Life.] Il Minotauro, Persiani Editore, Bologna, 2, 6-43.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255696745_Dalla_
Facolta_Acustico-Musicale_alle_Origini_del_Linguaggio_Orale
_Fino_al_Predominio_della_Cavita_Orale_che_Genera_il_Mondo
_sulla_Cavita_Uterina_che_Genera_la_Vita
[7]  Messori, C. (2016) From Continuity to Contiguity. On the Genesis of Consciousness, Culture and Oral Language - Part I-II-III-IV. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research, 7, 163-228.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295857703_From_
Continuity_to_Contiguity_On_the_genesis_of_consciousness_culture_and_
oral_language_Part_I_of_IV
[8]  Messori, C. (2015) Quale Modello per le Neuroscienze-Part II of III. [Which Model for Neuroscience.] Il Minotauro, Persiani Editore, Bologna, 2, 80-117.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278414562_Quale_
Modello_per_le_Neuroscienze
[9]  Messori, C. (2013) Near Death Experience nell’Epoca di Transizione da Homo Technologicus a Homo Artificialis. [Near Death Experience in the Age of Transition from Homo Technologicus to Homo Artificialis.] Il Minotauro, Persiani Editore, Bologna, 2, 6-56.
[10]  Messori, C. (2000) Il Sole e la Luna. Sulla Natura dei Simboli e della Mente Umana. [The Sun and the Moon. On the Nature of Symbols and Human Mind.] Federico Ceratti Editore, Milan, Italy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255696883_Il_
Sole_e_la_Luna_Sulla_Natura_dei_Simboli_e_della_Mente_Umana
[11]  Messori, C. (2004) Le Metamorfosi della Meraviglia. Riflessioni sui Percorsi della Conoscenza dall’Età del Bronzo ad Oggi. [The Metamorphoses of Wonderment. Reflections on the Paths of Knowledge from the Bronze Age to Present Day.] Maremmi Editori, Firenze Libri, Firenze, Italy.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255696858_Le_
Metamorfosi_della_Meraviglia
[12]  Hayek, F.A. (1946) The Road to Serfdom. George Routledge & Sons LTD, London, 68.
[13]  Minois, G. (2007) Storia dell’avvenire. [History of the Future. From Prophets to Futurology.] Dai profeti alla futurologia. Edizioni Dedalo, Bari.
[14]  Caritat de Condorcet, M.J.A.N. (1794) Outlines of an Historical View of the Progress of the Human Mind, Tenth Epoch, Future Progress of Mankind.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/condorcet-outlines-of-an-
historical-view-of-the-progress-of-the-human-mind#lf0878_head_013
[15]  Tang, L., et al. (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Human Zygotes Using Cas9 Protein. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 292, 525-533.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-017-1299-z
[16]  Liang, P., et al. (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Human Tripronuclear Zygotes. Protein Cell, 6, 363-372.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5
[17]  Regalado, A. (2015) Engineering the Perfect Baby. Scientists Are Developing Ways to Edit the DNA of Tomorrow’s Children. Should They Stop before It’s Too Late? MIT Technology Review.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/
[18]  Cyranoski, D. and Reardon, S.S. (2015) Chinese Scientists Genetically Modify Human Embryos, Nature.
http://www.nature.com/news/chinese-scientists-genetically-
modify-human-embryos-1.17378#/b1
[19]  Moxon, K.A. and Foffani, G. (2015) Brain-Machine Interfaces beyond Neuroprosthetics. Neuron, 86, 55-67.
http://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(15)00260
-3?_returnURL=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%
2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0896627315002603%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.036
[20]  Liu, J., et al. (2015) Syringe-Injectable Electronics. Nature Nanotechnology, 115, 1-36.
https://cml.harvard.edu/assets/NatNano_2015_10_629-636_Liu_SI.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.115
[21]  Lee, W., et al. (2015) Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 8743.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348665/
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08743
[22]  Edward, D., et al. (2013) Physiological and Modeling Evidence for Focal Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Humans: A Basis for High-Definition tDCS. Neuroimage, 7, 266-275.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359173/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.042
[23]  Herrmann, C.S., et al. (2013) Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation a Review of the Underlying Mechanisms and Modulation of Cognitive Processes. Frontiers in Human Nauroscience, 7, 279.
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279/full
[24]  Legon, W., et al. (2014) Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Modulates the Activity Of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Humans. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 322-329.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259699619_Transcranial
_focused_ultrasound_modulates_the_activity_of_primary_somatos
ensory_cortex_in_humans
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3620
[25]  Liu, G., et al. (2015) Syringe Injectable Electronics. Nat Nanotechnol., 10, 629-636.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4591029/
https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.115
[26]  Shuhmann, T.G. Jr., et al. (2017) Syringe-Injectable Electronics with a Plug-and-Play Input/Output Interface. Nano Letters, 17, 5836-5842.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03081
[27]  Mueller, J. (2014) Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Modulates Intrinsic and Evoked EEG Dynamics. Brain Stimulation, 7, 900-908.
http://www.brainstimjrnl.com/article/S1935-861X(14)00306-4/fulltext
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.08.008
[28]  Sanger, M. (1922) The Pivot of Civilization, from Chapter VI and VIII.
http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/abortion_eugenics/sanger/
[29]  Cohen, H. (2016) Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. Penguin Press, London.
[30]  Galton, F. (1883) Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. Macmillan and Co., London.
https://doi.org/10.1037/14178-000
[31]  Harward College Library (1914) Eugenics: Twelve University Lectures. By Morton Arnold Aldrich, William Herbert Carruth, Charles Benedict Davenport, William Henry Howell, Arthur Holmes, Harvey Ernest Jordan, Albert Galloway Keller, Edward Lee Thorndike, Victor Clarence Vaughan, Herbert John Webber, Robert Henry Wolcott, Charles Abram Ellwood, Ed., Dodd Mead and Company, New York. https://ia801409.us.archive.org/10/items/eugenicstwelveu
00ellwgoog/eugenicstwelveu00ellwgoog.pdf
[32]  Barondess, J.A. (1998) The Old Eugenics and the New Science. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 109, 174-182
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2194351/
[33]  Garland, E.A. (2001) Essays on Science and Society. Is a New Eugenics Afoot? Science, 294, 59-61.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/294/5540/59.full
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066325
[34]  Krige, J. and Pestre, D. (2013) Science in the Twentieth Century. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[35]  Stone, R. and Hunt, S.J. (2017) The Bush Crime Family: The Inside Story of an American Dynasty. Skyhorse Publishing Inc., New York.
[36]  Farber, S.A. (2008) U.S. Scientists’ Role in the Eugenics Movement (1907-1939): A Contemporary Biologist’s Perspective. Zebrafish, 5, 243-245.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2757926/
https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2008.0576
[37]  Kimmelman, B.A. (1983) The American Breeders’ Association: Genetics and Eugenics in an Agricultural Context, 1903-13. Social Studies of Science, 13, 163-204.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013002001
[38]  Spiro, J.P. (2009) Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. University Press of New England (UPNE), Lebanon.
[39]  Purdy, J. (2015) After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 181.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915671
[40]  Black, E. (2012) War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. Science and Society, Expanded Edition, Dialog Press.
[41]  Allen, G.E. (2004) Was Nazi Eugenics Created in the US? Book Review: War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. Science and Society, 5, 451-452
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1299061/
[42]  Kay, L.E. (1993) The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[43]  Masterjohn, C. (2009) The Rockfeller Foundation’s Molecular Vision of Life—How the Aims of Eugenics, Social Control, and Human Engineering Shaped Molecular Biology and 20th Century Science. A Review of Lily E. Kay’s The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993).
[44]  Jones, E. and Rahman, S. (2008) The Maudsley Hospital and the Rockefeller Foundation: The Impact of Philanthropy on Research and Training. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 64, 273-299.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2723762/
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrn065
[45]  Kuhl, S. (2002) The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[46]  Braund, J. and Sutton, D.G. (2008) The Case of Heinrich Wilhelm Poll (1877-1939): A German-Jewish Geneticist, Eugenicist, Twin Researcher, and Victim of the Nazis. Journal of the History of Biology, 41, 1-35.
[47]  Rabson, S.M. (1936) Alfred Grotjahn, Founder of Social Hygiene. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 12, 43-58.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1965908/
pdf/bullnyacadmed00856-0007.pdf
[48]  Willich, S.N. and Berghofer, A. (2013) George Wolff (1886-1952): Spreading the Legacy of Alfred Grotjahn to the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 2202-2203.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828972/
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301365
[49]  Kevles, D.J. (2013) From Eugenics to Genetic Manipulation. In: Krige, J. and Pestre, D., Eds., Science in the Twentieth Century, Chapter 16. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[50]  Aron, R. (2004) L’avvenire delle religioni secolari. [The Future of Secular Religions.] (1944) In: Forti, S., Ed., La filosofia di fronte all’estremo, Totalitarismo e riflessione filosofica [The Philosophy behind the Extreme. Totalitarianism and Philosophical Reflection], Einaudi, Torino, 4.
[51]  Cassier, E. (1973) La filosofia dell’Illuminismo. [The Enlightenment Philosophy.] (1932) La Nuova Italia, Firenze.
[52]  Talmon, J.L. (2000) Le origini della democrazia totalitarian. [The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy.] (1952) Il Mulino, Bologna.
[53]  Monnerot, J. (1970) Sociologia del comunismo. [Sociology of Communism.] (1949) Giuffrè Editore, Milano.
[54]  Sironneau, J.-P. (1995) Crisi religiosa dei Lumi e secolarizzazione. [Religious Crisis of the Enlightenment and Secularization.] In: Boschi, U., Cheng, A., Clemént, O., Cosi, D.M., Sfameni Gasparro, G., Margolin, G.-C., Massein, P., Paolini, L., Ries, J., Sironneau, J.-P., Eds., Crisi, rotture e cambiamenti [Crises, Breaks and Changes], Trattato di Antropologia del Sacro [Anthropology Treatise of the Sacred], Editoriale Jaca Book, Milano, Vol. 4, 337-338.
http://www.gianfrancobertagni.it/materiali/varia/riescrisi.pdf
[55]  Gold, H. (2004) Unit 731: Testimony. Tuttle Publishing, North Clarendon, Vermont.
[56]  Sheldon, H.H. (2002) Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare in 1932-45 and the American Cover-Up. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[57]  Williams, P. and Wallace, D. (1990) Unit 731: Japan’s Secret Biological Warfare in World War II. Grafton Books, London.
[58]  Messori, C. (2016) Intelligence vs Artificial Intelligence: The King is Naked. Open Access Library Journal, 3: e3115.
https://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?
PaperID=72003
[59]  Kay, L.E. (2000) Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA.
[60]  Gray, C.H. (1998) Postmodern War: The New Politics of Conflict. The Guilford Press, New York.
[61]  Gray, C.H. (2002) Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
[62]  Agbinya, J.I. (2011) Principles of Inductive Near Field Communications for Internet of Things. River Publishers, Aalborg, Denmark.
[63]  Bieri, M. and Dickow, M. (2014) Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: Future Challenges. Publikationen des Center for Security Studies (CSS), Switzerland.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal