All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

The Prepuce in Italian Art—Evidence from Von Gloeden’s Photographs

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102898, PP. 1-8

Subject Areas: Urology, Art, Andrology

Keywords: Prepuce, Foreskin, Penis, Circumcision, Renaissance Art, Classical Art, Baroque Art

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

It is well known that the portrayal of the male organ in classical art was subject to strict conventions and was not realistic. To what extent did this tradition carry over to the Italian Renaissance? Jewish Old and New Testament figures were not shown as circumcised, but was this a concession to classical convention or a portrayal of the actual, uncircumcised models? The photographs of Wilhelm von Gloeden, taken between 1890 and 1900, provide an invaluable record of young males in pre-industrial Italian society. Comparing these with paintings from the Italian High Renaissance (1450-1650) we discover a striking, and hitherto unreported, double standard in which juvenile males were depicted realistically whereas adolescents and adults were portrayed in accordance with classical ideals. This has led to misconceptions about the normal appearance of adult male prepuce which persist to the present day.

Cite this paper

Cox, G. (2016). The Prepuce in Italian Art—Evidence from Von Gloeden’s Photographs. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2898. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102898.

References

[1]  Mattelaer, J.J., Schipper, R.A. and Das, S. (2007) The Circumcision of Christ. The Journal of Urology, 178, 31-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.016
[2]  http://www.aboutcirc.com/abraham.htm
[3]  Hodges, F.M. (2001) The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75, 375- 405.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2001.0119
[4]  Rogers, B.O. (1973) History of External Genital Surgery. In: Horton, C.E., Ed., Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Genital Area, Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 3-15.
[5]  Maybury-Lewis, D. (1965) The Savage and the Innocent. Evans Bros, 270 p.
[6]  Cox, G. and Morris, B.J. (2012) Why Circumcision: From Prehistory to the Present Day. In: Bolnick, D.A., Koyle, M. and Yosha, A., Eds., Surgical Guide to Circumcision, Springer, Berlin, 243-259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2858-8_21
[7]  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Catalogue_of_Wilhelm_von_Gloeden%
27s_pictures#Virtual_catalogue_of_Wilhelm_von_Gloeden.27s_images

[8]  Mirisola, V. and Vanzella, G. (2004) Sicilia Mitica Arcadia. Von Gloeden e la “Scuola” di Taormina, Edizioni gente di fotografia, Palermo.
[9]  Kiermeier-Debre, J. and Vogel, F. (2007) Wilhelm von Gloeden—Auch ich in Arkadien, Boehlau Verlag, Koeln.
[10]  Robb, P. (1998) M. Duffy & Snellgrove, Sydney, 194-200.
[11]  Carrier, D. (1997) Principles of Art History Writing. Pennsylvania State University Press, (4th Printing), Philadelphia, 65.
[12]  Clark, K. (1966) Rembrandt and the Italian Renaissance. John Murray Publishers Ltd., London, 224 p.
[13]  Puglisi, C. (1998) Caravaggio, Phaidon, London/New York, 105-106.
[14]  Marshall, W.A. and Tanner, J.M. (1970) Variations in the Pattern of Pubertal Changes in Boys. Archive of Diseases in Childhood, 45, 13-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.45.239.13
[15]  Goldscheider, L. (1939-1940) The Sculptures of Michangelo. Phaidon Edition, George Allen and Unwin, London.
[16]  Lavin, M.A. (2009) Art of the Misbegotten: Physicality and the Divine in Renaissance Images. Artibus et Historiae, 60, 191-244.
[17]  Chartham, R. (1971) Advice to Men. Tandem, 175 p.
[18]  Osmond, T.E. (1953) Is Routine Circumcision Advisable? Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 99, 254.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal