All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


A Study on the Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in Busan Port and Shanghai Port

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102623, PP. 1-8

Subject Areas: Strategic Management, Economics, Operations Management

Keywords: Port Competitiveness, TOPSIS, Entropy, Port Throughput, Port Facility, Busan Port, Shanghai Port

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


This study seeks the strategy alternatives for continuous port competitiveness of Busan port improvement in rapidly changing of environment in Northeast Asia shipping. This study aims: 1) to compare port competitiveness of Busan and Shanghai port using entropy weigh TOPSIS; 2) to seek ways to improve port competitiveness of Busan port. After searching the related criteria on port competitiveness factors for analysis, the main criteria are divided into two categories: port throughput (port throughput, throughput change rate, and transshipment cargo volume and transshipment cargo rate), port facilities (depth, the number of C/C, berth length, the number of berth, total area, storage area) criteria of Busan and Shanghai port. The empirical results indicate that Shanghai port is more competitive than Busan port in total competitiveness and port throughput criteria, and Busan port is more competitive than Shanghai port in port facilities criteria.

Cite this paper

Kim, A. and Lu, J. (2016). A Study on the Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in Busan Port and Shanghai Port. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e2623. doi:


[1]  Saeed, N. (2009) An Analysis of Carriers’ Selection Criteria When Choosing Container Terminals in Pakistan. Maritime Economic and Logistics, 11, 270-288.
[2]  Sayareh, J. and Alizmini, H.R. (2014) A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Selecting Container Seaport in the Persian Gulf. Asian Journal of Shipping & Logistics, 30, 75-95.
[3]  Mangan, J., Lalwani, C. and Gardner, B. (2002) Modelling Port/Ferry Choice in RoRo Freight Transportation. International Journal of Transport Management, 1, 15-28.
[4]  Nir, A., Lin, K. and Liang, G. (2003) Port Choice Behavior—From the Perspective of the Shipper. Maritime Policy and Management, 30, 165-173.
[5]  Tiwari, P., Itoh, H. and Doi, M. (2003) Shippers’ Containerized Cargo Transportation Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis. Journal of Transportation Economics and Statistics, 6, 71-87.
[6]  Malchow, M. and Kanafani, A. (2001) A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 28, 265-277.
[7]  Malchow, M.B. and Kanafani, A. (2004) A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 317-337.
[8]  Yeo, K.T., Lee, H.G. and Oh, S.W. (2004) Extraction of Port Selection Factors for Increasing Shippers’Attraction of Small and Medium Ports (Written in Korean). Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 43, 33-53.
[9]  Yeo, G.T., Roe, M. and Dinwoodie, J. (2008) Evaluating the Competitiveness of Container Ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A, 42, 910-921.
[10]  Tongzon, J.L. (1995) Determinants of Port Performance and Efficiency. Transportation Research Part A, 29, 245-252.
[11]  Tongzon, J.L. and Sawant, L. (2007) Port Choice in a Competitive Environment: from the Shipping Lines’ Perspective. Applied Economics, 39, 477-492.
[12]  Tongzon, J.L. (2009) Port Choice and Freight Forwarders. Transportation Research Part E, 45, 186-195.
[13]  Ugboma, C., Ugboma, O. and Ogwude, I. (2006) An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Port Selection Decisions—Empirical Evidence from Nigerian Ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 251-266.
[14]  Grosso, M. and Monteiro, F. (2008) Relevant Strategic Criteria When Choosing a Container Port: The Case of the Port of Genoa. Association for European Transport and Contributors, 1-21.
[15]  Song, D.W. and Yeo, K.T. (2004) A Completive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 34-52.
[16]  Lirn, T.C., Thanopoulou, H.A., Beynon, M.J. and Beresford, A.K.C. (2004) An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, 70-91.
[17]  Cullinane, K. and Wang, T.F. (2006) Chapter 23 Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Improving Container Port Efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 517-566.
[18]  Chang, Y.T., Lee, S.Y. and Tongzon, J.L. (2008) Port Selection Factors by Shipping Lines: Different Perspectives between Trunk Liners and Feeder Service Providers. Marine Policy, 32, 877-885.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal