全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Influence of the Binder/Sand Ratio on the Performance of Geopolymer Mortar

DOI: 10.4236/ojcm.2025.153008, PP. 143-161

Keywords: Geopolymer, Kaolinite, Sand, Mortar, Portland Cement, Mechanical Resistance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Kaolinitic clay is the most sought-after natural source of aluminosilicate for the production of geopolymers, but it is found in large quantities in the Ivory Coast, but remains little exploited. Thus, this study was carried out to use these clays to produce geopolymer mortars as a substitute for Portland sand-cement. Its objective is to find the binder/sand ratio for the use of these materials in construction. It is in this context that local clay and sand were characterized by granulometric analysis, X-ray fluorescence and DRX (X-ray Diffraction). This clay, calcined at 750?C, then mixed with an alkaline solution, gives a geopolymer binder. For this geopolymer binder, sand was incorporated according to binder/sand ratios of 0.4 to 1, and mortars were produced. After molding, heat treatment at 80?C and curing at room temperature for 28 days, these mortars, which have become blocks, are mechanically tested. Their accessible porosity to water and their apparent density were also determined. The results indicate that the clay is made up of 80% kaolinite, to which muscovite and quartz are added. The compressive strength of the mortars increases from 19.11 to 27.09 MPa for ratios increasing from 0.4 to 0.7 and then decreases to 23.55 MPa, while the flexural strength values vary from 4.35 to 5.86 MPa. The measured accessible porosity to water is between 16.18% and 21.14% and the density is between 1.81 and 1.91 g/cm3. Mortars based on geopolymer binder and sand with a B/S ratio of 0.7 have the highest mechanical strength values. They can therefore be used in construction in the same way as sand-cement concrete blocks. This will reduce cement consumption. This B/S ratio of 0.7 will therefore be retained for the rest of the work.

References

[1]  Emeruwa, E., Kouadio, K.C., Kouakou, C.H., Boffoué, O.M., Assandé, A.A., Ouat-tara, S., Coulibaly, Y., Dauscher, A. and Lenoir, B. (2008) Caractérisation des argiles de la région d’Abidjan: Étude comparée de quelques gites et leur perspective de valor-isation. Revue Ivoirienne des Sciences et Technologie, 11, 177-192.
[2]  Andji, J.Y., Touré, A.A., Kra, G. and Yvon, J. (2009) États d’oxydation du fer dans les kaolins du gisement de Gounioubé: Un outil pour une meilleure compréhension des conditions de formation des kaolinites. Journal de la Société Ouest-Africaine de Chimie, 28, 17-26.
[3]  Turner, L.K. and Collins, F.G. (2013) Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2-e) Emissions: A Comparison between Geopolymer and OPC Cement Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 43, 125-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023
[4]  Nana, A., Alomayri, T.S., Venyite, P., Kaze, R.C., Assaedi, H.S., Nobouassia, C.B., et al. (2020) Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of a Metakaolin-Based Inorganic Polymer Mortar Reinforced with Quartz Sand. Silicon, 14, 263-274.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00816-4
[5]  Burciaga-Diaz, O., Escalante-Garcia, J.I. and Gorokhovsky, A. (2012) Geopolymers Based on a Coarse Low-Purity Kaolin Mineral: Mechanical Strength as a Function of the Chemical Composition and Temperature. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 18-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.08.001
[6]  Şahin, F., Uysal, M. and Canpolat, O. (2021) Systematic Evaluation of the Aggregate Types and Properties on Metakaolin Based Geopolymer Composites. Construction and Building Materials, 278, Article ID: 122414.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122414
[7]  Davidovits, J. (1989) Geopolymers and Geopolymeric Materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 35, 429-441.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01904446
[8]  Kamarudin, H., Mustafa, Al Bakri A.M., Binhussain, M., Ruzaidi, C.M., Luqman, M., Heah, C.Y. and Liew, Y.M. (2011) Preliminary Study on Effect of NaOH Concentration on Early Age Compressive Strength of Kaolin-Based Green Cement. International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Process, 10, 18-24.
[9]  Yeddula, B.S.R. and Karthiyaini, S. (2020) Experimental Investigations and Prediction of Thermal Behaviour of Ferrosialate-Based Geopolymer Mortars. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45, 3937-3958.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04314-7
[10]  Kong, D.L.Y., Sanjayan, J.G. and Sagoe-Crentsil, K. (2007) Factors Affecting the Performance of Metakaolin Geopolymers Exposed to Elevated Temperatures. Journal of Materials Science, 43, 824-831.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2205-6
[11]  Liew, Y.M., Kamarudin, H., Bakri, A.M.M.A., Binhussain, M., Luqman, M., Nizar, I.K., et al. (2011) Influence of Solids-To-Liquid and Activator Ratios on Calcined Kaolin Cement Powder. Physics Procedia, 22, 312-317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.049
[12]  ASTM International (2013) Standard Guide for Elemental Analysis by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. ASTM E1621-13.
[13]  AFNOR (2003) Essais non destructifs—Diffraction des rayons X appliquée aux ma-tériaux polycristallins et amorphes—Partie 1: Principes généraux. NF EN 13925-1.
[14]  AFNOR (2012) Essais pour déterminer les caractéristiques géométriques des gran-ulats-Partie 1: Détermination de la granularité—Analyse granulométrique par tam-isage. NF EN 933-1.
[15]  AFNOR (2022) Béton—Essai pour béton durci—Essai de porosité et de masse volumique. NF P18-459.
[16]  AFNOR (2016) Méthodes d’essais des ciments—Partie 1: Détermination des résis-tances. NF EN 196-1.
[17]  Singh, S., Aswath, M.U., Das Biswas, R., Ranganath, R.V., Choudhary, H.K., Kumar, R., et al. (2019) Role of Iron in the Enhanced Reactivity of Pulverized Red Mud: Analysis by Mössbauer Spectroscopy and FTIR Spectroscopy. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 11, e00266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00266
[18]  Chaabane, L., Moussaceb, K. and Aït‐Mokhtar, A. (2018) Efficiency of Stabilization/Solidification of Heavy Metals Contained in Hydroxide Sludge Waste into Metakaolin Based Geopolymers. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38, Article ID: 13137.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13137
[19]  Bich, C. (2005) Contribution à l’étude de l’activation thermique du kaolin: Évolution de la structure cristallographique et activité pouzzolanique. Master’s Thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon.
[20]  Benalia, S., Zeghichi, L. and Benghazi, Z. (2022) A Comparative Study of Metakaolin/Slag-Based Geopolymer Mortars Incorporating Natural and Recycled Sands. Civil Engineering Journal, 8, 1622-1638.
https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2022-08-08-07
[21]  Das, B.M. and Sobhan, K. (2018) Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. Cengage Learning.
[22]  Kuenzel, C., Li, L., Vandeperre, L., Boccaccini, A.R. and Cheeseman, C.R. (2014) Influence of Sand on the Mechanical Properties of Metakaolin Geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 442-446.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.058
[23]  Ferone, C., Liguori, B., Capasso, I., Colangelo, F., Cioffi, R., Cappelletto, E., et al. (2015) Thermally Treated Clay Sediments as Geopolymer Source Material. Applied Clay Science, 107, 195-204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.01.027
[24]  AFNOR (2012) Spécification pour éléments de maçonnerie—Partie 3: Éléments de maçonnerie en béton de granulats (granulats courants et légers)—Complément na-tional à la NF EN 771-3:2011. NF EN 771-3/CN.
[25]  AFNOR (2022) Briques et Blocs de terre crue pour murs et cloisons—Définitions—Spécifications—Méthodes d’essai—Conditions de réception. XP P 13-901.
[26]  AFNOR (2006) Eurocode 6—Calcul des ouvrages en maçonnerie—Partie 1-1: Règles communes pour ouvrages en maçonnerie armée et non armée. Eurocode 6 NF EN 1996-1-1.
[27]  Wan, Q., Rao, F., Song, S., Cholico-González, D.F. and Ortiz, N.L. (2017) Combination Formation in the Reinforcement of Metakaolin Geopolymers with Quartz Sand. Cement and Concrete Composites, 80, 115-122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.005
[28]  Jaya, N.A., Liew, Y.M., Heah, C.Y. and Abdullah, M.M.A.B. (2018) Effect of Solid-To-Liquid Ratios on Metakaolin Geopolymers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2045, Article ID: 020099.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5080912
[29]  Henon, J. (2012) Élaboration de matériaux poreux géopolymères à porosité multi-échelle et contrôlée. Master’s Thesis, Université de Limoges.
[30]  Luukkonen, T., Sarkkinen, M., Kemppainen, K., Rämö, J. and Lassi, U. (2016) Metakaolin Geopolymer Characterization and Application for Ammonium Removal from Model Solutions and Landfill Leachate. Applied Clay Science, 119, 266-276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.10.027
[31]  Zhang, M., Zhao, M., Zhang, G., El-Korchi, T. and Tao, M. (2017) A Multiscale Investigation of Reaction Kinetics, Phase Formation, and Mechanical Properties of Metakaolin Geopolymers. Cement and Concrete Composites, 78, 21-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.010
[32]  Lucas, S., Tognonvi, M.T., Soro, J., Rossignol, S. and Gelet, J.L. (2010) Consolidation of Sand by Alkaline Silicate Solution. Advances in Science and Technology, 68, 84-89.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.68.84
[33]  Niibori, Y., Kunita, M., Tochiyama, O. and Chida, T. (2000) Dissolution Rates of Amorphous Silica in Highly Alkaline Solution. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 37, 349-357.
https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2000.9714905

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133