Gbaya is a language featuring specific particles that warrant meticulous analysis. To analyze them, the linguistic data must undergo transformations that strengthen the morphological material. This is achievable through information transmission, in so far as the notion of the cleft is intrinsically linked to focus via its canonical ‘n？？.… a’ structure, which conveys new information and exhibits a cleft operator co-indexed with the focalized element. This cleft structure may undergo elision of the introductory element, unlike the exclusive marker of the cleft. Within this framework, Bago Kaptel (2022) distinguishes between relativization and clefting. The cleft formation process is based on the element marking the illocutionary force upon which the cleft rests, establishing a Cleft Phrase. Meanwhile, the introductory element ‘n？？’ identifies the focalized constituent among others, invoking a projection suggested here as the Designation Phrase (DesignP). These specificities of Gbaya clefting contribute to the refinement and enrichment of the theory while laying the groundwork for future research.
References
[1]
Akmadjian, A. (1970). On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudo-Cleft Sentences. LinguisticInquiry,1, 149-168.
[2]
Bago Kaptel, D. (2022). Lapériphériegauchepropositionnelledugbaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Ngaoundéré.
[3]
Bija’a, K. (2005). Ladynamiquedeslanguescamerounaisesencontactaveclefrançais:Approchemacrosociolinguistique. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Yaoundé I.
[4]
Biloa, E. (1995). Functional Categories andtheSyntaxofFocusinTuki. LINCOM EUROPA.
[5]
Büring, D., & Križ, M. (2013). It’s That, and That’s It! Exhaustivity and Homogeneity Presuppositions in Clefts (and Definites). SemanticsandPragmatics,6, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.6
[6]
Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-Movement. In P. Cullicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 71-132). Academic Press.
[7]
Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-Movement. In P. Cullicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal Syntax (pp. 71-132). Academic Press.
[8]
De Stefani, E. (2008). De la malléabilité des structures syntaxiques dans l’interaction orale: Le cas de la clivée. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008 (pp. 703-720). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf08239
[9]
Drubig, H. B. (2003). Toward a Typology of Focus and Focus Constructions. Linguistics,41, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.003
[10]
Hedberg, N. (1999). The Referential Status of Clefts. Language,76, 891-920. https://doi.org/10.2307/417203
[11]
Horn, L. R. (1969). A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even. In The 5th Annual Meeting ofChicagoLinguistic Society (pp. 98-107). Chicago Linguistic Society.
[12]
Jespersen, O. (1937). AnalyticSyntax. Allen and Unwin.
[13]
Kiss, K. É. (1998). Identificational Focus versus Information Focus. Language,74, 245-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/417867
[14]
Lambrecht, K. (2001). A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions. Linguistics,39, 463-516. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.021
[15]
Meinunger, A. (1996). The Structure of Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Sentences. Texas Linguistic Forum, 38, 235-246.
[16]
Muller, C. (2002). Clivées, coréférence et relativation. In G. Kleiber, & N. Le Querler (Éds.), Traits d’union (pp. 17-32). Presses Universitaires de Caen.
[17]
Ndoula, G (2001). Esquisse Phonologique et morphologique du bulu, parler d'Ebolowa. Mémoire de Master, Université de Yaoundé I.
[18]
Olowa, J. D. D. (2014). L’interface syntaxe-structure informationnelle en Fulfulde: Le modèle des Principes et Pa ramètres de la grammaire générative et transformationnelle. Master’s Thesis, Université de Ngaoundéré.
[19]
Ondoua Engon, C. C. (2011). CartographiedusystèmeForce-Finitudeenbúlú. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yao undé I.
[20]
Prince, E. (1981). Towards a Taxonomy of Given/New Information. In P. Cole (Éd.), RadicalPragmatics (223-255). Academic Press.
[21]
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar (pp. 281-337). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7
[22]
Robert, P. (2000). Le petit Robert: Dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française. Paris: Le Robert.
[23]
Roulon-Doko, P. (2000). Hiérarchie dans l’énoncé Gbaya. In B. Caron (Ed.), Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines (pp. 115-134). Peeters.
[24]
Rouquier, M. (2018). Les constructions clivées. Encyclopédie Grammaticale du Français. http://encyclogram.fr.1
[25]
Sandfeld, K. (1980). Syntaxe du français contemporain: Tome II, les propositions subordonnées. 2è éd. Morgens R. Jensen. Génève.
[26]
Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a Proposed Universal. In: Gass, S., & Shachter, J. (Eds). Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73-88.
[27]
Velleman, D., Beaver, D., Destruel, E., Bumford, D., Onea, E., & Coppock, L. (2012). It-clefts Are IT (Inquiry Terminating) Constructions. SemanticsandLinguisticTheory,22, 441-460. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.2640
[28]
Wagner, R.-L., & Pichon, J. (1991). Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette Supérieure, Coll. Hachette Université, 685 p.
