全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Research on the Participation Motivations of Users in UGC Society Based on DDCM

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2026.192006, PP. 115-126

Keywords: UGC Society, Participation Motivation, Dynamic Discrete Choice Model, Two-Stage Estimation Method

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study combines satisfaction, achievement motivation, and social identity theories to construct a dynamic discrete choice model (DDCM) to characterize user participation behavior on the Internet UGC platform. The main motivational factors of users participating in the UGC platform are analyzed and extracted, including enjoyment and entertainment motivation, identity motivation, community belonging motivation, and information acquisition motivation from psychological and social interaction. A two-stage estimation method constructs and solves a dynamic discrete choice model. Objective data from Epinions, an online review community, was used to investigate the motivation of users to participate in the UGC platform. The results show that users can gain enjoyment, entertainment, and information acquisition utility by publishing and reading articles in the Epinions community. When users are concerned and trusted by other users in the community, or when their published articles are recognized and praised, users will have a strong sense of identity. The more frequently a user contributes to the community, the more trust they have in other users, and the stronger their sense of community belonging. Finally, some suggestions for developing and managing the Internet UGC platform are put forward based on the estimation results of the model.

References

[1]  Aknouche, L., & oan, G. (2013). Motivations for Open Source Project Entrance and Continued.
https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=3814472&fileOId=3814483
[2]  Bajari, P., Benkard, C. L., & Levin, J. (2007). Estimating Dynamic Models of Imperfect Competition. Econometrica, 75, 1331-1370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00796.x
[3]  Chen, W., Wei, X., & Zhu, K. X. (2018). Engaging Voluntary Contributions in Online Communities: A Hidden Markov Model1. MIS Quarterly, 42, 83-100.
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/14196
[4]  Ciffolilli, A. (2003). Phantom Authority, Self-Selective Recruitment and Retention of Members in Virtual Communities: The Case of Wikipedia. First Monday, 8.
https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i12.1108
[5]  Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62, 53-82.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297841
[6]  Gowrisankaran, G., & Town, R. J. (1997) Dynamic Equilibrium in the Hospital Industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, 45-74.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1997.00045.x
[7]  Hotz, V. J., & Miller, R. A. (1989). Conditional Choice Probabilities and the Estimation of Dynamic Models. The Review of Economic Studies, 60, 497-529.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2298122
[8]  Hsu, M. H., Chang, C. M., Lin, H. C., & Li, H. C. (2018). Determinants of Continued Use of Social Media: The Perspectives of Uses and Gratifications Theory and Perceived Inter-activity. Information Research, 20, paper 671.
https://informationr.net/ir/20-2/paper671.html
[9]  Imai, S., & Krishna, K. (2004) Employment, Deterrence, and Crime in a Dynamic Model. International Economic Review, 45, 845-872.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00289.x
[10]  Kuang, L., Huang, N., Hong, Y., & Yan, Z. (2019). Spillover Effects of Financial Incentives on Non-Incentivized User Engagement: Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange Platform. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 289-320.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550564
[11]  Pakes, A., & McGuire, P. (2001). Stochastic Algorithms, Symmetric Markov Perfect Equilibrium, and the ‘Curse’ of Dimensionality. Econometrica, 69, 1261-1281.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00241
[12]  Park, J., & van der Schaar, M. (2010). A Game Theoretic Analysis of Incentives in Content Production and Sharing over Peer-To-Peer Networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 4, 704-717.
https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2010.2048609
[13]  Qiao, D., Lee, S., Whinston, A., & Wei, Q. (2017). Incentive Provision and Pro-Social Behaviors. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5599-5608). Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.675
[14]  Rust, J. (1987) Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica, 55, 999-1033.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1911259
[15]  Song, Y., Jin, M. Z., & Ren, P. Y. (2014). Empirical Study on Personal Motivation of UGC in Q&A Community. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30, 651-666.
[16]  Stock, J. H., & Wise, D. A. (1990). Pensions, the Option Value of Work, and Retirement. Econometrica, 58, 1151-1180.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2938304

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133