|
“数字化的亲密”:数字技术对青年亲密关系的建维
|
Abstract:
在传统社会中,亲密关系是那些能够提供爱、支持与结合等正向反馈的关系,在数字社会之中主要表现为现实亲密关系的数字延伸以及完全基于数字虚拟身份产生的亲密关系。“数字化的亲密”是指在数字实践中产生的一种既联结又区隔的亲密状态。为研究数字技术对青年亲密关系带来的影响,本文采用半结构式访谈,对14位青年进行深度访谈,发现“数字化的亲密”关系具体表现为现实亲密关系的数字化维系以及完全基于虚拟身份的数字亲密关系建构。在这基础上本文总结了“数字化的亲密”的建构机制,得出其本质是数字技术对青年群体亲密关系的结构性介入,同时因为数字化交流空间的“舞台”特性,发展出了全新的独特的亲密关系。最后对数字亲密关系进行进一步反思,以期全面看待这一特殊关系状态。
In traditional society, intimate relationships are those that provide positive feedback such as love, support, and bonding. In the digital society, they mainly manifest as digital extensions of real-life intimate relationships and intimate relationships that are entirely based on digital virtual identities. “Digital intimacy” refers to a state of intimacy that is both connected and differentiated in digital practice. To investigate the impact of digital technology on intimate relationships among young people, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 young people and found that the “digital intimacy” relationship is specifically manifested as the digital maintenance of real-life intimate relationships and the construction of digital intimate relationships entirely based on virtual identities. On this basis, this article summarizes the construction mechanism of “digital intimacy” and concludes that its essence is the structural intervention of digital technology in the intimate relationships of young people. At the same time, due to the “stage” characteristics of digital communication spaces, new and unique intimate relationships have been developed. Finally, further reflection is needed on digital intimacy relationships in order to comprehensively examine this particular state of relationship.
[1] | Sperry, L. (2010) Intimacy: Definition, Contexts, and Models for Understanding Its Development and Diminishment. In: Carlson, J. and Sperry, L., Eds., Recovering Intimacy in Love Relationships: A Clinician’s Guide, Routledge, 3-14. |
[2] | Prager, K.J. (1995) The Psychology of Intimacy. The Guilford Press. |
[3] | 夏当英, 李静. 技术二重性: 数字时代“空巢青年”的情感体验与主体解困[J]. 中国青年研究, 2024(7): 38-47. |
[4] | 李华伟, 徐开彬. 信息渗透与权力博弈: 社交媒介在青年亲密关系中的作用研究——基于关系发展的阶段理论[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(6): 48-58+47. |
[5] | 杜骏飞. 数字交往论(3): 从媒介化到共同演化[J]. 新闻界, 2022(3): 14-23+69. |
[6] | 陈拓, 吴向然. 个体化与技术共谋: 青年异地夫妻数字化亲密研究[J]. 东南学术, 2023(4): 186-196. |
[7] | 王福丽. 中介化的亲密: 智能手机对当代城市家庭关系的影响与建构——基于昆明市中产家庭的质性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2020. |
[8] | 凌羽乔. 处理信息的信息: 数字化社会的技术范式——基于卡斯特的技术范式视角[J]. 未来传播, 2019(6): 14-20+111. |
[9] | [德]诺贝特·埃利亚斯. 个体的社会[M]. 翟三江, 陆兴华, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2003. |
[10] | [美]欧文·戈夫曼. 日常生活中的自我呈现[M]. 黄爱华, 冯钢, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1989. |
[11] | 中国互联网络信息中心. 第54次中国互联网络发展状况的统计报告[EB/OL]. https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2024/0829/c88-11065.html, 2024-08-29. |
[12] | Janning, M., Gao, W. and Snyder, E. (2018) Constructing Shared “Space”: Meaningfulness in Long-Distance Romantic Relationship Communication Formats. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1281-1303. |
[13] | Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press. |
[14] | [美]约书亚·梅罗维茨. 消失的地域: 电子媒介对社会行为的影响[M]. 肖志军, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2002: 7. |
[15] | [美]雪莉·特克尔. 群体性孤独[M]. 周逵, 刘菁荆, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2015. |
[16] | 朱莉莉, 李灵琳. 基于能动性的数字关系: 社交网络空间的亲子互动[J]. 中国地质科学学报, 2017(9): 95-104. |