|
新质生产力视角下区域绿色发展效率水平评价——基于浙江省11个地级市的实证研究
|
Abstract:
在新质生产力视角下,本文基于2013~2023年浙江省11个地级市的数据,运用超效率SBM-DEA模型对非期望产出下的绿色发展效率进行测度,并借助全局Malmquist-Luenberger指数对全要素生产率进行分解,研究浙江省绿色发展效率及变化特征。结果表明:第一,浙江省的绿色发展效率值呈波动上升趋势,万亿城市群绿色发展较为平稳,各地级市之间绿色发展效率差距较大;第二,浙江省存在严重的投入冗余,全社会供水总量、节能环保支出投入过多;第三,浙江省全要素生产率在研究期间内有所提高,全要素生产率的提高源于技术效率进步,技术进步未发挥重要作用。研究结论对响应新质生产力发展要求、提升区域绿色发展效率、推动经济社会高质量协调发展具有理论参考价值。
From the perspective of new quality productive forces, based on the data of 11 prefectural-level cities in Zhejiang Province from 2013 to 2023, this paper applies the super-efficient SBM-DEA model to measure the green development efficiency under non-expected output, and decomposes the total factor productivity with the help of global Malmquist-Luenberger index to study the green development efficiency and the changing characteristics of Zhejiang Province. The results show that: first, the value of green development efficiency in Zhejiang Province shows a fluctuating upward trend, the green development of trillion city cluster is relatively smooth, and there is a large gap in green development efficiency among prefecture-level cities; second, there is a serious input redundancy in Zhejiang Province, and there are excessive inputs in the total amount of water supply of the whole society and energy saving and environmental protection expenditures; third, the total factor productivity in Zhejiang Province has increased during the study period, but the increase in total factor productivity is due to technological progress, which does not play an important role. The conclusions of the study have theoretical reference value for responding to the requirements of the development of new quality productive forces, improving the efficiency of regional green development, and promoting high-quality coordinated economic and social development.
[1] | 卢丽文, 宋德勇, 李小帆. 长江经济带城市发展绿色效率研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2016, 26(6): 35-42. |
[2] | 刘明广, 黄彦婷, 许培涵, 等. 粤港澳大湾区绿色创新效率时空演化与影响因素研究[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(4): 70-76. |
[3] | 张羽, 蔡茜, 焦柳丹, 等. 绿色技术创新效率及其时空差异——基于长江经济带74个城市的实证研究[J]. 生态经济, 2024, 40(4): 63-69. |
[4] | 罗良文, 梁圣蓉. 中国区域工业企业绿色技术创新效率及因素分解[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2016, 26(9): 149-157. |
[5] | Fang, Z., Gui, W., Han, Z. and Lan, L. (2023) The Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factor Analysis of Regional Green Innovation: A Refined Dynamic Network Slacks-Based Measure Approach. Kybernetes, 53, 2153-2193. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-03-2022-0420 |
[6] | Al-Majali, A.A. (2024) Estimation of Green Total Factor Productivity and Green Efficiency in Jordan Based on the Super-SBM Model. Journal of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-04-2024-0236 |
[7] | Liu, D., Liu, T. and Zheng, Y. (2024) Study on Urban Green Development Efficiency of Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Fujian in China: A Mixed Network SBM Approach. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-08-2023-1556 |
[8] | Liu, R., Jiang, J. and Long, Y. (2024) How Does the Digital Economy Affect Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 68, 1514-1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2289103 |
[9] | Tone, K. (2002) A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00324-1 |
[10] | Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. (1982) The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388 |
[11] | Oh, D. (2010) A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y |
[12] | 张孝德. “两山”之路是中国生态文明建设内生发展之路——浙江省十年“两山”发展之路的探索与启示[J]. 中国生态文明, 2015(3): 28-34. |
[13] | 吴洁, 张云, 韩露露. 长三角城市群绿色发展效率评价研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2020(11): 46-55. |
[14] | 苏喜军, 李自钰. 基于超效率SBM-DEA的黄河流域绿色发展效率评价[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(4): 38-46. |