|
数字经济、产业优化与经济高质量发展
|
Abstract:
数字经济在推动经济发展中的核心地位和主引擎作用日益突出,探寻数字经济对经济高质量发展的促进机制和效应,具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。本文基于2011~2020年的面板数据,运用熵权法测度了中国30个省份的经济高质量发展指数和数字经济发展指数,从产业优化视角检验了数字经济推动经济高质量发展的效应和机制,并进行了区域异质性分析。结果表明:从整体上来看,数字经济能够显著促进经济高质量发展,且在剔除直辖市样本进行稳健性检验后该结论仍然成立;从作用机制上来看,产业优化在数字经济促进经济高质量发展的过程中发挥着重要作用。区域异质性结果显示:东部地区和西部地区数字经济对经济高质量发展的促进效果明显,而东北地区的影响不显著,中部地区则呈现出微弱的负向制约但不显著。因此,要加快数字化转型,释放数实融合效应;优化要素配置,加快产业优化升级;因地制宜施策,推动整体协调发展。
The core position of the digital economy in promoting economic development was increasingly prominent, and the role of the main engine of the digital economy played. Thus, exploring the effects and mechanisms of the digital economy in promoting high-quality economic development showed important theoretical and practical significance. Based on the panel data from 2011 to 2020, the entropy method was applied to measure the high-quality economic development index and digital economy development index of 30 provinces in China. From the perspective of industrial optimization, the effects and mechanisms of the digital economy promoting high-quality economic development were examined. Regional heterogeneity was also analyzed. The empirical outcomes revealed that, overall, the digital economy could significantly advance high-quality economic development, and this conclusion was still valid after robustness test by excluding samples from municipalities directly under the central government. From the perspective of impact mechanism, industrial optimization played key roles in the process of digital economy promoting high-quality economic development. Heterogeneity analysis indicated that the effect of the digital economy on high-quality economic development was more significant in the eastern and western areas than in other regions of China, with the impact of the northeast region not significant, while the central region presented a weak but not significant negative constraint. Suggestions included accelerating digital transformation and unleashing the integration effect of the digital economy and the real economy, optimizing element allocation and boosting industrial optimization and upgrading, adapting individualized policies according to local conditions and advancing overall coordinated development.
[1] | 马玥. 数字经济赋能经济高质量发展的机理、挑战及政策建议[J]. 求是学刊, 2022, 49(6): 74-83. |
[2] | 郭家堂, 骆品亮. 互联网对中国全要素生产率有促进作用吗? [J]. 管理世界, 2016(10): 34-49. |
[3] | 张永恒, 王家庭. 数字经济发展是否降低了中国要素错配水平? [J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2020, 35(9): 62-71. |
[4] | 肖旭, 戚聿东. 产业数字化转型的价值维度与理论逻辑[J]. 改革, 2019(8): 61-70. |
[5] | 丁志帆. 数字经济驱动经济高质量发展的机制研究: 一个理论分析框架[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2020(1): 85-92. |
[6] | 任保平. 数字经济引领高质量发展的逻辑、机制与路径[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2020, 33(2): 5-9. |
[7] | 任保平, 何厚聪. 数字经济赋能高质量发展: 理论逻辑、路径选择与政策取向[J]. 财经科学, 2022(4): 61-75. |
[8] | 荆文君, 孙宝文. 数字经济促进经济高质量发展: 一个理论分析框架[J]. 经济学家, 2019(2): 66-73. |
[9] | 王谦, 付晓东. 数据要素赋能经济增长机制探究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2021(4): 55-66. |
[10] | 洪银兴, 任保平. 数字经济与实体经济深度融合的内涵和途径[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(2): 5-16. |
[11] | 方晓萍, 廖晓玲, 邓又军. 我国省际高质量发展水平测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(5): 111-115. |
[12] | 赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10): 65-75. |
[13] | 刘军, 杨渊鋆, 张三峰. 中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2020(6): 81-96. |
[14] | 徐振剑, 吕拉昌, 辛晓华. 中国城市数字经济发展空间分异及其影响因素[J]. 经济纵横, 2023(8): 71-79. |
[15] | 包振山, 殷凤春. 数字经济、流通业升级与经济增长[J]. 中国流通经济, 2023, 37(4): 37-46. |
[16] | 苏冰杰, 卢方元, 朱峰, 李彦龙. 中国数字经济发展水平: 时空特征、动态演化及影响因素[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 161-168. |
[17] | 刘伟, 张辉, 黄泽华. 中国产业结构高度与工业化进程和地区差异的考察[J]. 经济学动态, 2008(11): 4-8. |
[18] | 樊纲, 王小鲁, 马光荣. 中国市场化进程对经济增长的贡献[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(9): 4-16. |