|
志贺直哉于《在城崎》中的创伤书写
|
Abstract:
志贺直哉的心境小说《在城崎》常被置于生死观的角度下进行评析,然而以创伤视角切入会发现,作者对资本主义发展的弊端、明治维新后社会状况的相关思考同样发人深省。实际上,志贺直哉因车祸在城崎疗养结束后,不仅身体得到痊愈,心理创伤也被治愈,这从作者写完这篇小说三个月后与父亲和解可以得到考证。本文通过对三个小动物死亡场景的描写并结合周围环境描写,试图分析作者在家庭、社会经历的创伤以及创伤治愈的过程。
Shiga Naoya’s introspective novel In Kinosaki is often analyzed through the lens of views on life and death. However, examining it from a traumatic perspective reveals the author’s equally profound reflections on the shortcomings of capitalist development and post-Meiji Restoration social conditions. In reality, after recovering physically from his accident and convalescing in Kinosaki, Shiga also experienced psychological healing, as evidenced by his reconciliation with his father three months after completing the novel. Through analyzing depictions of the deaths of three small animals and their surrounding environments, this paper explores the author’s personal and societal traumas, as well as his healing process.
[1] | 陶箭. 日本近现代著名作家及作品评述[M]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2014. |
[2] | 吴鲁鄂. 日本近现代文学作品选读[M]. 第二版. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012. |
[3] | 黄玉梅. 志贺直哉作品中对生死的表述[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2012. |
[4] | 吕智杰. 论《在城崎》的生死观[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2014. |
[5] | 王符. 论志贺直哉的《在城崎》与心境小说在日本文学中的地位[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学), 1992(1): 107-111. |
[6] | 邢雪艳. 志贺直哉的“小物”情节和心境转换[J]. 日语学习与研究, 2004(4): 61-63. |
[7] | 肖书文. 论志贺直哉《在城崎》中的死亡意识[J]. 云梦学刊, 2006(6): 117-120. |
[8] | 张婧磊. 新时期文学中的创伤叙事研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版, 2017: 12-13. |
[9] | 志贺直哉. 志贺直哉集 现代日本文学大系34(全97卷) [M]. 东京: 筑摩书房, 2003: 389. |
[10] | 榛原守一. 小さいな資料室(資料538): 「城の崎にて」の作者の電車事故について[Z]. https://sybrma.sakura.ne.jp/538naoyanodensyajiko.html, 2025-04-10. |
[11] | 志贺直哉. 在城崎[M]. 吴菲, 译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2022. |
[12] | Garland, C. (1998) Understanding Trauma: A Psychoanalytic Approach. Routledge, 157. |
[13] | 志贺直哉. 和解[M]. 陈若雷, 译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2022. |
[14] | 靳全明. 日本文论史[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019: 133. |