|
E-Commerce Letters 2025
直播带货中主播法律地位与责任形态研究
|
Abstract:
本文围绕直播带货主播法律地位与责任形态展开研究。通过剖析商家自营、商家他营、平台合作三种运营模式,发现主播存在身份认定偏差和责任边界模糊问题,像商家自营模式有“劳动关系泛化”倾向等。为此,提出以“实际控制力”为核心的身份动态认定模型。重构民商法责任形态,合同责任与侵权责任依《民法典》完善,前者完善要约瑕疵认定、审查格式条款效力,后者依第1165条明确过错推定,确定虚假宣传连带责任;平台协作责任结合算法,依《电子商务法》第38条重构平台过错认定。针对司法争议,给出解决路径,还探讨《电子商务法》完善,构建复合标准认定主播身份,依相关条款完善消费者权益保护,实现双赢。
This paper centers on the legal status and liability form of live broadcast anchor. By analyzing the three operation modes of merchant self-operated, merchant other-operated, and platform cooperation, it is found that there are identity bias and responsibility boundary blurring problems of anchors, such as the tendency of “generalization of labor relations” in the merchant self-operated mode. For this reason, a dynamic identification model with “actual control” as the core is proposed. Reconstructing the civil and commercial law liability form, contract liability and tort liability in accordance with the Civil Code to improve, the former to improve the determination of defective offer, review the effectiveness of the format terms, the latter in accordance with Article 1165 to clarify the presumption of fault, to determine the joint and several liability for false propaganda; the platform collaborative responsibility combined with the algorithm, in accordance with the E-Commerce Law, Article 38 reconstructed the determination of the fault of the platform. In view of the judicial disputes, the solution path is given, and the improvement of the E-Commerce Law is also explored to construct a composite standard to determine the identity of the anchor, and improve the protection of consumers’ rights and interests according to the relevant provisions to realize a win-win situation.
[1] | 黄佳梭. 数字经济背景下直播电商税收治理问题研究[J]. 商场现代化, 2025(5): 160-163. |
[2] | 王智珑. 中国如何因应欧盟《数字服务法“布鲁塞尔效应”》[J]. 西昌学院学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(6): 75-85. |
[3] | 张文静, 陈茹, 刘静. 广告代言人的连带责任问题探究——以《消费者权益保护法》第45条第3款为视角分析[J]. 知识经济, 2014(8): 23. |
[4] | 罗典宜. 电子商务平台经营者法律责任认定研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 绵阳: 西南科技大学, 2020. |
[5] | 王利娟. 网红直播营销侵权行为的民事法律责任探究[J]. 西部学刊, 2022(2): 104-107. |
[6] | 程永伟. 直播带货的合作模式与决策优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 297-306. |
[7] | 惠宁宁. 拒绝霸王条款套路[J]. 法人, 2024(12): 74-75. |
[8] | 郑丽萍, 白景兮. 网络服务提供者类型化基础上的审查义务——以拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪为对象[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 2024, 51(5): 58-69. |
[9] | 杨柳. 论直播带货中消费者知情权的保障——以“辛巴销售假燕窝案”为例[J]. 河北企业, 2024(4): 157-160. |
[10] | 肖飒. 直播带货“翻车”谁负责[J]. 方圆, 2021(9): 74. |
[11] | 季为民. 网络主播的职业特点、风险挑战与良性发展路径[J]. 人民论坛, 2025(3): 96-100. |
[12] | 沈峰. 规范适用七日无理由退货规则[J]. 中国防伪报道, 2024(4): 38. |