全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

西部民族地区经济高质量发展水平测度
Measurement of the Level of High-Quality Economic Development in Western Ethnic Regions

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1451410, PP. 1304-1315

Keywords: 西部民族地区,经济高质量发展,熵值法,耦合协调度模型
Western Ethnic Regions
, High-Quality Economic Development, Entropy Method, Coupling Coordination Degree Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文聚焦西部民族地区八省区,基于新发展理念构建经济高质量发展指标评价体系,运用熵值法和耦合协调度模型,对2014~2023年该地区经济高质量发展水平进行测度与分析。结果显示,整体发展水平呈上升趋势,但区域差异显著,广西表现最佳,西藏相对滞后。各子系统发展水平不一,创新发展水平整体上升但省际差异大,协调发展水平整体向好且差距较小,绿色发展水平提升明显,开放发展水平差异极大,共享发展水平呈上升趋势。经济高质量发展系统的耦合度较高但波动下降,协调度和耦合协调度稳步上升,处于中等协调水平。基于研究结论,为推动西部民族地区经济高质量发展提出针对性建议。
This paper focuses on the eight ethnic minority-inhabited provinces and autonomous regions in western China. Based on the new development concept, an evaluation index system for high-quality economic development is constructed, and the entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model are used to measure and analyze the high-quality economic development level of this region from 2014 to 2023. The results show that the overall development level is on an upward trend, but there are significant regional differences. Guangxi performs best, while Xizang lags behind relatively. The development levels of each subsystem vary. The innovation development level shows an overall upward trend with large inter-provincial differences. The coordinated development level is generally good with relatively small gaps. The green development level has improved significantly. The open development level varies greatly. The shared development level shows an upward trend. The coupling degree of the high-quality economic development system is relatively high but shows a fluctuating downward trend, while the coordination degree and the coupling coordination degree show a steady upward trend, being at a medium-coordinated level. Based on the research conclusions, targeted suggestions are put forward to promote the high-quality economic development of the ethnic minority-inhabited regions in western China.

References

[1]  屈小娥, 马黄龙, 王晓芳. 省域经济高质量发展水平综合评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(16): 98-103.
[2]  任海军, 崔婧. 经济高质量发展评价指标体系构建与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(13): 31-34.
[3]  宋豪, 张继泽, 张爱儒. 中部地区经济高质量发展测度与差异研究[J]. 中国商论, 2023(7): 5-9.
[4]  翁异静, 周祥祥, 陈思静. 长江经济带经济高质量发展差异性机理及对策分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2022, 38(2): 186-193.
[5]  陈知之, 郑起越. 数字经济对东北三省经济高质量发展的影响测度研究[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(11): 102-111.
[6]  魏艳华, 马立平, 王丙参. 中国八大综合经济区经济高质量发展测度研究——基于高维标度评价法[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2023, 42(5): 883-904.
[7]  魏艳华, 王丙参, 朱琳. 基于时空熵权TOPSIS评价法的经济高质量发展水平测度——以广东省为例[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(8): 91-95.
[8]  闫海春, 齐红倩. 民族地区省域经济高质量发展的测度与分析——以内蒙古自治区为例[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(1): 53-59.
[9]  黄顺春, 陈洪飞. 黔滇桂青民族地区经济增长与经济高质量发展协同度分析[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2021, 42(2): 135-143.
[10]  鲁万波, 贾光宁. 西藏经济高质量发展指标体系构建与测度[J]. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 37(3): 172-181.
[11]  杨永芳, 王秦. 新时代中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(S1): 182-190.
[12]  丁晨辉, 田泽, 宋晓明, 等. 新发展理念下中国区域经济高质量发展研究——水平测度、时空分异与动态演变[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2022(12): 3-9.
[13]  鲁亚运, 原峰, 李杏筠. 我国海洋经济高质量发展评价指标体系构建及应用研究——基于五大发展理念的视角[J]. 企业经济, 2019, 38(12): 122-130.
[14]  高顺岳, 高从扬. 浙江市域经济增长质量与数量排序比较研究[J]. 统计科学与实践, 2019(12): 20-23.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133