|
应急准备能力对自然灾害损失程度的影响研究——基于31个省际面板数据分析
|
Abstract:
防灾减灾、抗灾救灾是人类生存法则的永恒课题,我国是世界上受自然灾害影响最为严重的国家之一,随着灾害种类、复杂性增加,自然灾害造成重大的人员生命财产损失,应急准备作为全过程危机理论中的一个环节,应急准备能力是应对突发自然灾害事件的关键。为客观评价全国应急准备能力水平,根据已有相关研究,本研究建立灾害因素和应对因素两个准则层13个关键指标的综合评价指标体系,利用熵值法对应急准备能力进行综合量化分析,将应急准备能力综合评分作为解释变量,运用2020~2022年我国31个省(市、自治州)的面板数据,进一步分析和探讨应急准备能力对自然灾害损失程度的影响。结果表明:(1) 各省份应急准备能力存在较大差距。(2) 应急准备能力评价指标体系中权重系数较高的指标大多属于第二项准侧层“应对因素”的指标。(3) 应急准备能力对灾害损失程度有显著的影响,能力越高对自然灾害损失程度的降低效果越好。基于此,从加强自然灾害防治规划、构建协同应急模式、加强灾害信息流通、完善应急服务保障四个维度出发,对提升应急准备能力提出针对性建议。
Disaster prevention, mitigation and disaster relief are the eternal subject of human existence. China is one of the countries most seriously affected by natural disasters in the world. With the increase in the types and complexity of disasters, natural disasters cause heavy loss of human life and property. In order to objectively evaluate the level of national emergency preparedness, based on the existing relevant studies, this study established a comprehensive evaluation index system of 13 key indicators in the two criterion layers of disaster factors and response factors, used the entropy method to conduct a comprehensive quantitative analysis of emergency preparedness ability, and took the comprehensive score of emergency preparedness ability as an explanatory variable. The panel data of 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous prefectures) from 2020 to 2022 were used to further analyze and discuss the impact of emergency preparedness on the loss degree of natural disasters. The results show that: (1) There is a large gap in emergency preparedness capacity among provinces. (2) Most of the indicators with high weight coefficient in the evaluation index system of emergency preparedness capability belong to the second level of “coping factors”. (3) Emergency preparedness capacity has a significant impact on the degree of disaster loss, and the higher the capacity, the better the effect of reducing the degree of natural disaster loss. Based on this, from the four dimensions of strengthening natural disaster prevention and control planning, building collaborative emergency response mode, strengthening disaster information circulation, and improving emergency service guarantee, specific suggestions are put forward to improve emergency preparedness capability.
[1] | 国家减灾委. 2022年全国自然灾害基本情况报告[R]. 北京: 应急管理出版社, 2023. |
[2] | 益言. 世界经济论坛发布《2023年全球风险报告》[J]. 中国货币市场, 2023(3): 66-72. |
[3] | Cutter, S.L. (2013) Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 55, 25-29. |
[4] | UNDRR (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. United Nations. |
[5] | 周进军, 李洪泉, 邓云峰, 等. 地震灾害综合应急能力评估研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(3): 56-60. |
[6] | 邢宇宙. 协同治理视角下我国社会组织参与灾害救援的实现机制[J]. 行政管理改革, 2017(8): 59-63. |
[7] | 国务院办公厅印发《国家综合防灾减灾规划(2016-2020年)》[J]. 中国应急管理, 2017(1): 27-31. |
[8] | 国家防灾减灾救灾委员会办公室应急管理部发布2023年全国十大自然灾害[J]. 中国减灾, 2024(16): 6-7. |
[9] | 方恒, 罗壮. 浙江: 数字赋能推进防灾减灾全面提升自然灾害防治智慧能力[J]. 中国减灾, 2023(13): 16-17. |
[10] | 从“应急使命·2024”演习看新质生产力如何赋能智慧应急[J]. 中国应急管理, 2024(5): 84-85. |
[11] | 赵丽君, 杨相玉, 刘明锋, 等. 响应新质生产力建设汉威数智技术赋能智慧应急管理[J]. 中国应急管理, 2024(6): 82-83. |
[12] | 应急管理部中央文明办民政部共青团中央联合印发《关于进一步推进社会应急力量健康发展的意见》[J]. 中国安全生产, 2022, 17(12): 5. |
[13] | 许新宇, 潘存英, 白翔宇. 地震地质灾害监测预警信息共享机制研究[J]. 河南科技, 2024, 51(3): 106-110. |
[14] | 马福云, 张颢婷. 从应急到减灾: 北京市社区灾害风险应对机制分析[J]. 中国应急管理科学, 2022(11): 98-107. |