|
E-Commerce Letters 2025
消费者绿色偏好影响下的双渠道绿色供应链定价决策研究
|
Abstract:
文章构建由单一制造商和零售商组成的双渠道绿色供应链,考虑消费者对产品具有绿色偏好,基于Stackelberg博弈,求解双渠道绿色供应链在分散决策模式和集中决策模式下的最优决策,并对不同情境下的最优决策变化进行了对比分析。进一步地,研究了消费者绿色偏好对供应链各参与主体决策的影响,并采用数值模拟方法对理论推导结果进行检验。研究表明:集中决策模式下,双渠道绿色供应链的最优决策结果优于分散决策模式下的决策效果,供应链成员进行合作更有利于双渠道绿色供应链的长期发展;消费者绿色偏好对供应链决策具有显著影响,绿色偏好的提高可以促进绿色产品的销售,进而促进绿色发展;消费者对绿色产品的偏好能够促使制造商加大绿色生产投入,进而提升产品的绿色度。制造商也会相应提高绿色产品的定价,从而获取更高的利润。
The article constructs a dual-channel green supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a retailer, considering that consumers have a green preference for products. Based on the Stackelberg game, the optimal decisions of the dual-channel green supply chain under decentralized and centralized decision-making modes are solved, and the changes in optimal decisions under different scenarios are compared and analyzed. Furthermore, the impact of consumers’ green preferences on the decisions of supply chain participants is studied, and the theoretical derivation results are tested using numerical simulation methods. The research shows that: under the centralized decision-making mode, the optimal decision results of the dual-channel green supply chain are better than those under the decentralized decision-making mode, and cooperation among supply chain members is more conducive to the long-term development of the dual-channel green supply chain; consumers’ green preferences have a significant impact on supply chain decisions, and the increase in green preferences can promote the sales of green products, thereby promoting green development; consumers’ preference for green products can encourage manufacturers to increase green production investment, thereby improving the greenness of products. Manufacturers will also correspondingly increase the pricing of green products to obtain higher profits.
[1] | 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 贯彻实施《国家标准化发展纲要》行动计划(2024-2025年) [EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202403/content_6942541.htm, 2025-3-15. |
[2] | 林志炳. 考虑政府补贴及产能约束的两周期绿色供应链定价研究[J/OL]. 工业工程与管理, 1-21[2025-05-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1738.T.20250226.1736.014.html |
[3] | Mei, Y., Cao, K., Liu, Y. and Mangla, S.K. (2024) Effects of Manufacturer Fairness Concerns and Carbon Emission Reduction Investment on Pricing Decisions under Countervailing Power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 461, Article 142616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142616 |
[4] | 梁喜, 胡鑫. 考虑区块链和产品回收的绿色供应链定价决策[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2023, 29(11): 3851-3868. |
[5] | 陈克兵, 王雨琦, 肖迪. 基于消费者产品偏好的制造商渠道选择和绿色度水平与定价决策[J/OL]. 管理工程学报, 1-16[2025-05-06]. https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2025.03.018 |
[6] | 王志宏, 王鑫, 戴家宏. 社交影响下考虑消费者损失规避行为的产品众筹优化决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2025, 39(1): 125-139. |
[7] | Zhou, H., Liu, M. and Tan, Y. (2023) Long-Term Emission Reduction Strategy in a Three-Echelon Supply Chain Considering Government Intervention and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preferences. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 186, Article 109697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109697 |
[8] | 孙嘉轶, 龙琦, 滕春贤. 自主创新vs.技术外取: 考虑研发能力的绿色供应链研发策略与合同设计[J/OL]. 中国管理科学, 1-23[2025-05-06]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.0337 |
[9] | Chen, J., Dimitrov, S. and Pun, H. (2019) The Impact of Government Subsidy on Supply Chains’ Sustainability Innovation. Omega, 86, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012 |
[10] | 韩同银, 刘丽, 金浩. 考虑政府补贴和公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 194-204. |