全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中国古代司法机构改革及其启示研究
Research on the Reform of Judicial Institutions in Ancient China and Its Implications

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2025.134107, PP. 743-750

Keywords: 中国古代,司法机构改革,监督
Ancient China
, Judicial Reform, Supervision

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

我国古代司法体系经历了深刻的变革与发展,从整体上来看,司法体系变革主要表现在司法机构的变革与革新。中国古代司法机构的设置经历了一系列的变迁,文章以中国古代司法机构改革为主要的着力点进行研究与分析,探究中国古代司法机构改革的特点以及所起到的重要意义,同时分析中国古代司法机构改革过程中的弊端,这些弊端主要包括重形式轻实质、机构改革过程更服务于封建统治、司法机构变革过程缺少独立性,以及司法机构改革缺少整体的监督。基于以上研究与分析,要强化中国古代司法机构变迁与改革的认知,并分析从古代司法机构改革过程中所带来的重要启示。
China’s ancient judicial system has undergone profound changes and development, and from the overall point of view, the reform of the judicial system is mainly manifested in the reform and innovation of the judicial organs. The establishment of the ancient Chinese judicial institutions has undergone a series of changes. The article takes the reform of the ancient Chinese judicial institutions as the main focus of research and analysis, explores the characteristics of the reform of the ancient Chinese judicial institutions and the important significance it plays, and analyzes the shortcomings in the reform process of the judicial institutions in ancient China, which mainly include the emphasis on form over substance, the institutional reform process is more in service to feudal rule, the judicial reform institutional reform process lacks independence, and the judicial reform lacks overall supervision. Based on the above research and analysis, it is necessary to strengthen the understanding of the changes and reforms of the judicial institutions in ancient China, so as to analyze the important enlightenment brought about by the reform process of the ancient judicial institutions.

References

[1]  张晋藩. 薪火集: 中国法制史学通论[M]. 厦门: 鹭江出版社, 2003: 206, 210.
[2]  膠腰. 中国古代司法的观念和制度[J]. 法制与社会, 2009(2): 25-29.
[3]  沈大明. 中国古代的证据制度及其特点[J]. 社会科学, 2006(7): 139-145.
[4]  尤志安. 清末刑事司法改革研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2004.
[5]  张晋藩. 中国近代与法制文明[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003.
[6]  故宫博物院明清档案部, 汇编. 清末筹备立宪档案史料[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1979.
[7]  喻中. 从“行政兼理司法”到“司法兼理行政”——我国“司法-行政”关系模式的变迁[J]. 清华法学, 2012, 6(5): 19-29.
[8]  张霁. 论我国古代赎刑制度及其现代启示[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2020.
[9]  周锋. 新时代司法改革中的法律职业伦理建设研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2019.
[10]  艾永明. 中国古代监察与司法的关系——兼议对当代监察体制改革的启示[J]. 法治研究, 2018(5): 14-23.
[11]  董小红. 论中国古代司法体制的演变[J]. 武汉商业服务学院学报, 2008, 22(2): 39-42.
[12]  王继尧. 论中国古代司法制度的演变及特点[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2004.
[13]  韩秀桃. 司法独立与近代中国[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003.
[14]  Tag, M.N. (2021) Judicial Institutions of Property Rights Protection and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows. International Review of Law and Economics, 65, Article 105975.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105975
[15]  Jacques, P. (2017) The Grace of the Judges. The Judicial Institution and the Sacred in the West. Cahiers de Civilisation Medievale, 60, 185-186.
[16]  Melro, A., Teles, F. and Oliveira, L. (2022) Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6, 38-48.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
[17]  韩秀桃. 民国时期兼理司法制度的内涵及其价值分析[J]. 安徽大学学报, 2003, 27(5): 133-138.
[18]  刘昕杰. 政治选择与实践回应: 民国县级行政兼理司法制度述评[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2009, 30(4): 99-104.
[19]  黄燕群. 1927-1932年的湖北省司法公署初探[J]. 咸宁学院学报, 2005, 25(4): 31-33.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133