|
评价理论视角下外研版高中英语教材文化语篇的态度资源分析
|
Abstract:
本研究基于评价理论,对外研版高中英语必修三册教材中的文化内容语篇进行了态度资源的标注、编码与统计分析,并结合语境探讨了其中的情感态度。研究结果表明,该教材的文化内容语篇广泛运用了多样化的态度资源,其中情感资源和鉴赏资源占据主导地位;积极态度资源占多数,而部分消极态度资源则用于辅助积极资源,以传达正确的价值观念。基于此,建议英语教师在教学过程中指导学生注意评价性词汇的使用,并结合文化背景了解其传达的情感态度,以培养学生的文化情感,引导他们形成正确的世界观、人生观和价值观。此外,针对部分语篇中评价性词汇使用重复、单一的现象,建议教材编写者丰富态度资源的词汇表达,以提供更具多样性的语言学习资源,提升学生的批判性阅读与跨文化理解能力。
This study, grounded in Appraisal Theory, examines attitudinal resources in the cultural content texts of the FLTRP High School English Textbook (Compulsory 1~3) through annotation, coding, and analysis, while also exploring the emotions and attitudes within these texts in context. The findings indicate that the cultural content texts extensively employ diverse attitudinal resources, with affective and appreciation resources predominating. Positive attitudinal resources are more prevalent, while certain negative resources are used to complement the positive ones, thus conveying appropriate values. Based on these findings, it is suggested that English teachers should guide students to pay attention to the use of evaluative vocabulary in the teaching process, and understand the attitude conveyed by it in combination with cultural background, so as to cultivate students’ cultural awareness and guide them to form a correct outlook on world, life and values. In addition, in view of the repeated use of evaluative vocabulary in some texts, it is suggested that textbook authors enrich the vocabulary expression of attitudinal resources, so as to provide more diverse language learning resources and improve students’ critical reading and intercultural communication competence.
[1] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中课程方案(2017年版2020年修订) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020: 4. |
[2] | 章策文. 英语学科核心素养之文化意识: 实质内涵与实践路径[J]. 基础教育课程, 2019(3): 49-53. |
[3] | Kramsch, C. (1993) Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press. |
[4] | 张伟年. 英语教材评价理论框架研究[J]. 外语研究, 2014(1): 67-73. |
[5] | 王振华. 评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2001(6): 13-20. |
[6] | Martin, J.R. (2000) Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English. In: Hunston, S. and Thompson, G., Eds., Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford University Press, 142-175. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0008 |
[7] | Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. |
[8] | Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. Continuum. |
[9] | Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2007) Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. 2nd Edition, Bloomsbury. |
[10] | 徐玉臣, 剡璇, 苏蕊. 态度评价手段的篇章分布规律研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2014(4): 28-32. |
[11] | 程晓堂, 孙晓慧. 英语教材分析与设计(修订版) [M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2011. |
[12] | Cortazzi, M. and Jin, L.X. (1999) Cultural Mirrors: Materials and Methods in the EFL Classroom. In: Hinkel, E., Ed., Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Cambridge University Press, 196-219. |
[13] | Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967) Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. In: Helm, J., Ed., Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, University of Washington Press, 12-44. |
[14] | 邓炎昌, 刘润清. 语言与文化: 英汉语言文化对比[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 1989. |