Pragmatics, especially speech act theory, is crucial for analyzing political discourse. It goes beyond simple information exchange to reveal the strategic use of language for influence, persuasion, and action. This paper investigates the speech acts employed by Netanyahu in his speech delivered on 7 October, 2023, considering both his intent and the contextual circumstances surrounding his utterance. Findings revealed that 38.46% of Netanyahu’s speech is dedicated to assertives, 23.07% to directives, 15.38% to declaratives and 7.69% to commissives. Two statements were employed for two different purposes: assertive-directive (7.69%) and declarative-commissive (7.69%). Combining assertions with directives and declarations indicates that the speech emphasizes the delivery of information and action taken, with a degree of authority and commitment. This analysis also suggests that, through a strategic use of language, the speaker employs a calculated approach which aims to inform, guide, and persuade, emphasizing authority and purpose over emotional expression. However, this study, while offering insights into Netanyahu’s communication, is limited by its dependence on a single speech, which might possibly misrepresent his overall style and neglect broader contextual factors. To achieve a more comprehensive understanding and validate the findings, future research should expand data sources by analyzing more speeches for the same speaker, incorporate a wider contextual analysis, and investigate audience reception.
References
[1]
Addae, A., Alhassan, H., & Kyeremeh, Y. S. (2022). Discursive Strategies of Ideological Representations in Political Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Speeches of Kwame Nkrumah. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 6, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i2.396
[2]
Alqahtani, H. A. (2024). Impact of Use of Language on Audience’s Perception: A Qualitative Analysis of Speeches by Hillary Clinton. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9, 293. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p293
[3]
Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.
[4]
Awal, A. (2022). Legal and Political Intervention on Language Issues in Bangladesh: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability, 2, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.30659/ijsunissula.2.1.22-35
[5]
Baider, F. (2019). Double Speech Act: Negotiating Inter-Cultural Beliefs and Intra-Cultural Hate Speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.006
[6]
Bull, P., & Waddle, M. (2021). Speaker-Audience Intercommunication in Political Speeches: A Contrast of Cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.001
[7]
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[8]
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
[9]
De Stefani, E., & De Marco, D. (2019). Language, Gesture, and Emotional Communication: An Embodied View of Social Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2063. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02063
[10]
Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 735-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
[11]
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226210735.001.0001
[12]
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
[13]
Fogal, D., Harris, D., & Matt M. (2018). New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford University Press.
[14]
Gao, H., Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. (2016). The Use of Public Language in Strategy: A Multidisciplinary Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 42, 21-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315615675
[15]
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
[16]
Harris, D. W., & McKinney, R. (2021). Speech-Act Theory: Social and Political Applications. In J. Khoo, & R. K. Sterken (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language (pp. 70-90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164869-7
[17]
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
[18]
Lawan, H. M. (2016). A Critical Discourse of Metaphor in Selected Acceptance and Inaugural Speeches of Presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Barack Obama. https://kubanni.abu.edu.ng/items/7d174ef7-30ca-4174-af30-8c2722a9c81c
[19]
Mohammed Hashim, S. S. (2015). Speech Acts in Political Speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5, 699-706. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.05.2015/008
[20]
Oyewole, J. (2023). Exploring Power Dynamics in Political Discourse: A Discourse Analysis of Political Speeches. Education and School Review, 18, 177-192.
[21]
Ramanathan, R., Paramasivam, S., & Bee Hoon, T. (2020). Discursive Strategies and Speech Acts in Political Discourse of Najib and Modi. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i3.3168
[22]
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173438
[23]
Taguchi, N. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085
[24]
Taguchi, N., & Kadar, D. (in Press). Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Area: Pragmatics. Wiley.
[25]
Times of Israel (2023). ‘We Are at War,’ Netanyahu Says, after Hamas Launches Devastating Surprise Attack. https://www.timesofisrael.com/we-are-at-war-netanyahu-says-after-hamas-launches-devastating-surprise-attack/
[26]
The Guardian. (2023). “We are at war”: Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu Makes Statement on Hamas Attack—Video. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2023/oct/07/we-are-at-war-israels-benjamin-netanyahu-makes-statement-on-hamas-attack-video
[27]
Usmani, S., & Almashham, A. (2024). Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Analysing Speech Acts in Different Cultures. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1586
[28]
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What Is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
[29]
Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political Discourse and Ideology. Doxa Comunicación. Revistainterdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y cienciassociales, 1, 207-225. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n1a12
[30]
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
[31]
Zou, L., & Yiye, Z. (2022). Review of Research on Development of Speech Act Theory and Its Application. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.16
