|
E-Commerce Letters 2025
电商视域下算法霸权法律规制路径研究
|
Abstract:
本文探讨了电商领域算法霸权的形成机制、表现形式及法律规制困境。平台通过数据垄断和算法黑箱形成的隐性控制权,在电商实践中表现为大数据杀熟、动态定价伪装歧视、算法歧视导致资源分配失衡,以及推荐算法构建的信息茧房与认知操控。目前法律面临三大困境:规则模糊使算法透明度义务缺位,消费者举证责任过重导致维权失败,跨平台数据垄断缺乏有效制约。为此,完善路径需多维推进:强化平台算法透明化义务及第三方监管机制;通过举证责任倒置与算法参数公开保障消费者权益;推动立法细化数据可携权、反垄断条款,以平衡技术创新与公平正义,遏制算法霸权的扩张。
This article explores the formation mechanism, manifestation, and legal regulation predicaments of algorithmic hegemony in the e-commerce field. The implicit control power formed by data monopoly and algorithm black box of platforms is manifested in e-commerce practices as big data price discrimination against regular customers, dynamic pricing masquerading as discrimination, algorithmic discrimination leading to imbalanced resource allocation, and the information cocoon and cognitive manipulation constructed by recommendation algorithms. Currently, the law faces three major predicaments: the ambiguity of rules leads to the absence of algorithm transparency obligations, the heavy burden of proof for consumers results in failed rights protection, and the lack of effective constraints on cross-platform data monopolies. Therefore, the improvement path needs to be advanced in multiple dimensions: strengthening the obligation of algorithm transparency for platforms and the third-party supervision mechanism; ensuring consumer rights through the reversal of the burden of proof and the public disclosure of algorithm parameters; promoting the refinement of legislation on data portability rights and anti-monopoly provisions to balance technological innovation and fairness and justice, and curb the expansion of algorithmic hegemony.
[1] | [美]凯西·奥尼尔. 算法霸权[M]. 北京, 中信出版社, 2018. |
[2] | 邹开亮, 刘佳明. 大数据“杀熟”的法律规制困境与出路——仅从《消费者权益保护法》的角度考量[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(8): 47-50. |
[3] | 赖丽华, 邱琳. 数字经济发展视域下算法“霸权”的法律规制研究[J]. 企业经济, 2023, 42(5): 151-160. |
[4] | 孟勤国. 治理算法歧视侵害消费者权益的关键问题——以大数据杀熟为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2023(3): 37-47. |
[5] | 许丹琳. 算法驱动型差别待遇行为法律规制的反思与完善[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(3): 30-44. |
[6] | 张凌寒.《电子商务法》中的算法责任及其完善[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 31(6): 16-21. |
[7] | 田钒平, 田甡睿, 张耀. 数字化时代“信息茧房”风险与民族事务治理[J]. 民族学刊, 2023, 14(8): 72-84+163. |
[8] | 徐伟, 韦红梅. 数智时代算法推荐风险的法律治理[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2024(3): 27-36. |
[9] | 许明月, 陈小维. “大数据杀熟”行为的法律规制——以消费者权益保护为视角[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 72-80. |
[10] | 邢根上, 鲁芳, 周忠宝, 等. 数据可携权能否治理“大数据杀熟”? [J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 85-95. |
[11] | 宋书强.《反垄断法》视域下“大数据杀熟”法律规制及对策[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2024(4): 45-48. |
[12] | 冯泽华, 刘向东. 数据可携权的国际模式与中国进路[J]. 青年记者, 2023(4): 97-99. |