电商平台反向炒信行为的法律适用路径
The Legal Application Path of Reverse Trust Trading Behavior on E-Commerce Platforms

电商平台反向炒信行为历经三个发展阶段，其已经具备相当的社会危害性，亟待刑法介入以保护电商平台交易安全。当下司法实践倾向于将反向炒信行为一概认定为破坏生产经营罪的实行行为，却忽略具体危害行为及危害结果的差别，有违刑法谦抑性。应当对功能主义解释论的实质思维进行限制，类型化适用诈骗罪、损害商业信誉、商品声誉罪、侵占罪等罪名，实现刑法保障与保护机能的协调。
The reverse trading behavior of e-commerce platforms has gone through three stages of development, and it has already possessed considerable social harm, urgently requiring criminal law intervention to protect the transaction security of e-commerce platforms. The current judicial practice tends to classify reverse speculation as the implementation of the crime of disrupting production and operation, but ignores the differences in specific harmful behaviors and harmful results, which violates the modesty of criminal law. The substantive thinking of functionalist interpretivism should be restricted, and charges such as fraud, damage to commercial reputation, commodity reputation, and embezzlement should be typified to achieve the coordination of criminal law protection and protection functions.