全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

政府、企业、消费者关于绿色生产的三方博弈
The Tripartite Game between the Government, Enterprises and Consumers on Green Production

DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.144321, PP. 685-698

Keywords: 政府监管,企业决策,演化博弈,仿真分析
Government Regulation
, Business Decision-Making, Evolutionary Game, Simulation Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

一直以来,企业的生产行为都是多方关注、多方投入的重要命题。为了探究政、企、消费者三方决策的相互关系,寻求新时代政企平衡、绿色生产的新机遇,本文立足于目前生产消费环境,构建了以政府、企业为主体的演化博弈模型后,引入了相关消费者决策影响因素,并分析了三方的决策影响关系和不同决策下的收益,最终在Matlab2019中对三个主体进行不同策略环境下的仿真推演。并得出以下结论:政府引导企业绿色生产行为上,无论是监管还是补贴,都可提高企业选择绿色生产的概率,但是其促进效果会在超过一定范围后逐渐削弱;因市场相关性前提,消费者的策略行为受政企双方决策影响不大;企业的生产决策存在边界值,而若无政府积极引导,企业大概率会选择传统生产;企业的生产决策会反作用于政府决策,形成制衡关系。
For a long time, the production behavior of enterprises has been an important proposition of multi-party attention and multi-party investment. In order to explore the interrelationship between the decision-making of the government, enterprises and consumers, and seek new opportunities for the balance between government and enterprises and green production in the new era, this paper constructs an evolutionary game model with the government and enterprises as the main body based on the current production and consumption environment, introduces the relevant consumer decision-making influencing factors, analyzes the decision-making influence relationship of the three parties and the benefits under different decisions, and finally simulates the three subjects in different strategic environments in Matlab2019. The following conclusions are drawn: the government’s guidance of enterprises’ green production behavior, whether it is supervision or subsidies, can increase the probability of enterprises choosing green production, but its promotion effect will gradually weaken after exceeding a certain range; due to the premise of market relevance, consumers’ strategic behavior is not greatly affected by the decisions of both government and enterprises. There is a boundary value in the production decision of enterprises, and if there is no active guidance from the government, enterprises are likely to choose traditional production; the production decision of the enterprise will react to the government’s decision-making, forming a relationship of checks and balances.

References

[1]  张中祥. 碳达峰、碳中和目标下的中国与世界——绿色低碳转型、绿色金融、碳市场与碳边境调节机制[J]. 人民论坛∙学术前沿, 2021(14): 69-79.
[2]  俞海, 宁晓巍, 张强, 等. 新质生产力本身就是绿色生产力的理论内涵与实践向度[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2024, 46(6): 771-776.
[3]  胡莉莉, 孙晓娟, 刘凤楠. 中国区域农业生产用能、农业经济增长及农业能源碳排放关系研究——基于绿色全要素生产率视角[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(3): 174-186.
[4]  刘琦铀, 林丽婷, 张成科. 基于随机演化博弈视角的绿色农产品生产与合谋监管研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(11): 119-126.
[5]  杨霞, 何刚, 吴传良, 等. 碳交易机制下政府与重污染企业碳减排演化博弈分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(11): 4097-4107.
[6]  邵举平, 周将军, 孙延安. “碳中和”背景下基于演化博弈与双层规划的供应链减排动力研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(12): 79-85.
[7]  尚雅茹, 白春光, 郭雨. 碳中和背景下碳排放企业林业碳汇项目融资模式选择策略研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践: 1-21.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2267.n.20240711.1716.038, 2024-07-25.
[8]  胡姜, 李雪涛, 王逸雯. 绿色技术创新中多元异质性主体演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(12): 71-78.
[9]  蒙大斌, 李新宇, 李磊. 绿色金融政策与“两高”企业融资成本——信号博弈下绿色创新的中介反应[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(18): 23-32.
[10]  王丹, 梁靖涵, 张瑞雪. “双碳”背景约束下绿色技术创新四方演化博弈及仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2024, 33(11): 72-77.
[11]  孙鹏, 黄锦辉, 李杰, 等. 中央环保督察、政商关系与企业绿色创新——影响机理与扩散路径[J]. 财经研究, 2024, 50(7): 95-110.
[12]  王利莎, 王子琳, 王永昭. 平台生态标签情境下的漂绿行为演化与监管研究[J]. 管理评论, 2025, 37(2): 224-236.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133