|
Modern Linguistics 2025
北宋与五代宰相词的比较研究——以晏殊、和凝的词为例
|
Abstract:
本文以五代宰相和凝与北宋宰相晏殊的词为研究对象,通过创作背景、创作对象与创作风格的比较,探讨花间词派在五代至北宋时期的发展轨迹。研究发现,和凝的词作延续花间传统,以绮丽婉媚为特征,其宫闱题材与艳情书写体现五代词风;晏殊在继承花间传统的基础上,融入士大夫的生命意识与人生哲思,开创出“闲雅有情思”的婉约新风。二者虽同属宰辅词人,但因时代背景、文化环境的差异,在词体功能认知与审美取向上形成显著区别。本研究为理解唐宋词学流变提供了新的观察视角。
This paper focuses on the Ci poetry of Ning He, a prime minister of the Five Dynasties, and Shu Yan, a prime minister of the Northern Song Dynasty, exploring the developmental trajectory of the Huajian School from the Five Dynasties to the Northern Song period through comparisons of their creative contexts, thematic subjects, and stylistic approaches. The study reveals that Ning He’s works adhere to the Huajian tradition, characterized by ornate and delicate aesthetics, with themes centered on court life and romantic expressions that epitomize the poetic style of the Five Dynasties. In contrast, Shu Yan, while inheriting the Huajian tradition, infused his poetry with the existential reflections and philosophical contemplations of scholar-officials, pioneering a new 婉约 (wanyue) style marked by “leisurely elegance and emotional profundity”. Despite both being prime minister-poets, their divergent historical contexts and cultural environments led to significant differences in their perceptions of Ci’s functional role and aesthetic orientations. This research offers a fresh perspective for understanding the evolution of Ci poetry during the Tang-Song transition.
[1] | 唐圭璋. 唐宋词鉴赏辞典[M]//唐五代北宋卷. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1988. |
[2] | 高锋. 花间词研究[M]. 南京: 江苏古籍出版社, 2001. |
[3] | 盛蕾. 和凝词简析[J]. 安徽文学(下半月), 2008(11): 113. |
[4] | 李冰若. 花间集评注[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1993. |
[5] | 叶梦得. 避暑录话[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1984. |
[6] | 吴熊和. 唐宋词汇评[M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 2004. |
[7] | 高锋. 花间词研究[M]. 南京: 江苏古籍出版社, 2001. |
[8] | 胡家全, 刘云峰. 晏殊与和凝词之比较[J]. 科技经济场, 2007(4): 292. |
[9] | 孙克强. 试论唐宋词坛词体观的演进——以《花间集叙》《词论》《乐府指迷》为中心[J]. 文学遗产, 2017(2): 72-80. |