The integration of arts into science education is increasingly recognized as a means to enhance both cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes. This study examines whether the incorporation of art elements into STEM lessons influences pupils’ motivation, self-efficacy, flow experience, and subject-specific interest. A longitudinal design was employed, with data collected from 471 pupils across eight schools at two measurement points. The findings indicate a significant increase in self-efficacy, subject-specific STEM interest, extrinsic regulation and interest in art among pupils who participated in the intervention. These results suggest that artistic activities not only make STEM subjects more engaging but also foster a broader appreciation for the arts. The study highlights the potential of interdisciplinary teaching strategies in enhancing motivation and self-efficacy, offering valuable implications for educational practice and future research.
References
[1]
Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The Effects of Different Learning Environments on Students’ Motivation for Learning and Their Achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02076.x
[2]
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[3]
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the Dawn of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education: Prospects, Priorities, Processes, and Problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53, 2919-2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2021.1922943
[4]
Boiko, A., Nistor, A., Kudenko, I., & Gras-Velazques, A. (2019). The Attractiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Subjects. Results from Five Countries. European Schoolnet.
[5]
Caprille, M., Palmén, R., Sanz, P., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM Studies for the Labor Market. European Union: Directorate General for Internal Policies.
[6]
Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The Arts and Achievement in At-Risk Youth: Findings from Four Longitudinal Studies(Research Report 55). National Endowment for the Arts. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530822.pdf
[7]
Connors-Kellgren, A., Parker, C. E., Blustein, D. L., & Barnett, M. (2016). Innovations and Challenges in Project-Based STEM Education: Lessons from ITEST. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 825-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9658-9
[8]
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: How to Monitor Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488195
[9]
Conradty, C., Sotiriou, S. A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-Efficacy and Motivation. Education Sciences, 10, Article 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030070
[10]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
[11]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). The Theory of Self-Determination of Motivation and Its Relevance to Pedagogics. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 39, 223-238. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:11173
[12]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
[13]
DeMoss, K., & Morris, T. (2002). How Arts Integration Supports Student Learning: Students Shed Light on the Connections. Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education (CAPE).
[14]
Dibiasi, A., Binder, D., Langen, H., Unger, M., & Thaler, B. (2024). Status Quo und aktuelle Herausforderungen im MINT-Bereich an Hochschulen und am Arbeitsmarkt. Institute for Advanced Studies. https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/6993/1/ihs-report-2024-dibiasi-binder-et-al-mint-bereich-hochschulen-arbeitsmarkt.pdf
[15]
ESCO (2024). The ESCO Classification. Occupations. ESCO Dataset–v1.2.0. https://esco.ec.europa.eu/en/classification/occupation?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.europa.eu%2Fesco%2Fisco%2F
[16]
European Commission (2023). Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.European Year of Skills: Skills Shortages, Recruitment and Retention Strategies in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Report. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/s/z4TM
[17]
Fensham, P. J. (2022). The Future Curriculum for School Science: What Can Be Learnt from the Past? Research in Science Education, 52, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10090-6
[18]
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
[19]
Herro, D., Quigley, C., Andrews, J., & Delacruz, G. (2017). Co-Measure: Developing an Assessment for Student Collaboration in STEAM Activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article No. 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z
[20]
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a Motivational Variable that Combines Affective and Cognitive Functioning. In D. Y. Dai, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition (pp. 470). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610515
[21]
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest. Research in Science Education, 40, 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
[22]
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis from Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 1300-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
[23]
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[24]
Kröner, J., Goussios, C., Schaitz, C., Streb, J., & Sosic-Vasic, Z. (2017). The Construct Validity of the German Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) within Primary and Secondary School Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01032
[25]
Lee, B. K., Enciso, P., & Brown, M. R. (2020). The Effect of Drama-Based Pedagogies on K-12 Literacy-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of 30 Years of Research. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 21, No. 30. https://doi.org/10.26209/IJEA21N30
[26]
Madison, E., Anderson, R., & Bousselot, T. (2019). Self-Determined to Write: Leveraging Interest, Collaboration, and Self-Direction through a Journalistic Approach. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35, 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1579127
[27]
Meulenbroeks, R., van Rijn, R., & Reijerkerk, M. (2024). Fostering Secondary School Science Students’ Intrinsic Motivation by Inquiry-Based Learning. Research in Science Education, 54, 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10139-0
[28]
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (2016). Creative Cognitive Processes in Higher Education. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.77
[29]
OECD (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en
[30]
Ramm, G., Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., Neubrand, M., Pekrun, R., Rolf, H.-G., Rost, J., & Schiefele, U. (2012). Fragebogenerhebung PISA/I-Internationale Studie (2003) (Skalenkollektion). Programme for International Student Assessment. https://doi.org/10.7477/15:287:1
[31]
Ruddock, G., Clausen-May, T., & Purple, C. (2006). Validation Study of the PISA 200. PISA 2003 and TIMSS-2003 International Studies of Pupil Attainment(Research Report RR772). National Foundation for Educational Research. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4156059.pdf
[32]
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
[33]
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and Self-Regulation. In Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation (pp. 341-372). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012619070-0/50034-9
[34]
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
[35]
Soomro, S. A., Casakin, H., Nanjappan, V., & Georgiev, G. V. (2023). Makerspaces Fostering Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10041-4
[36]
Sung, J., Lee, J. Y., & Chun, H. Y. (2023). Short-term Effects of a Classroom-Based STEAM Program Using Robotic Kits on Children in South Korea. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article No. 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00417-8
[37]
Toferer, B., Lang, B., & Salchegger, S. (2023). PISA 2022. Kompetenzen in Mathematik, Lesen und Naturwissenschaft am Ende der Pflichtschulzeit im internationalen Vergleich. https://doi.org/10.17888/PISA2022-EB
[38]
Urhahne, D. (2008). Sieben Arten der Lernmotivation. Psychologische Rundschau, 59, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.59.3.150
[39]
Ziefle, M., & Jakobs, E. M. (2009). Wege Zur Technikfaszination (Paths to a Fascination with Technology). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04983-5
