全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“走班制”教学模式下中学德育管理问题及对策
Problems and Countermeasures of Middle School Moral Education Management under the Class-Selection System

DOI: 10.12677/ces.2025.134209, PP. 11-19

Keywords: 走班制,中学德育,教学管理
Class-Selection System
, Middle School Moral Education, Teaching Management

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

文章旨在探讨“走班制”教学模式对中学德育管理的影响及其实施策略。“走班制”作为一种新兴的教学模式,通过打破传统固定班级的限制,允许学生根据自己的兴趣、能力和学习需求选择课程和教师,从而提高了学习的自主性和灵活性。然而,这种教学模式也给中学的德育管理带来了新的挑战和机遇。文章首先分析了“走班制”教学模式下,中学德育管理面临的主要问题,包括学生流动性大导致的学生集体意识弱、德育管理主体职责落实难度大、教师“育人”不到位等。随后,文章从学生主体、德育管理者、教师角色转变等多个角度提出了应对策略,以加强“走班制”下的德育管理。本文的研究不仅为中学德育管理提供了新的思路和方法,也为“走班制”教学模式的进一步完善和推广提供了理论支持和实践指导。
This article aims to explore the impact of the “Class-Selection System” teaching model on moral education management in middle schools and its implementation strategies. As an emerging teaching model, the “Class-Selection System” breaks through the limitations of traditional fixed classes, allowing students to choose courses and teachers based on their interests, abilities, and learning needs, thereby improving learning autonomy and flexibility. However, this teaching model has also brought new challenges and opportunities to moral education management in secondary schools. The article first analyzes the main problems faced by middle school moral education management under the “Class-Selection System” teaching mode, including weak student collective consciousness caused by high student mobility, difficulty in implementing the main responsibilities of moral education management, and inadequate teacher “education”. Subsequently, the article proposed coping strategies from multiple perspectives such as student centeredness, moral education managers, and teacher role transformation to strengthen moral education management under the “Class-Selection System”. This study not only provides new ideas and methods for moral education management in middle schools, but also provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the further improvement and promotion of the “Class-Selection System” teaching model.

References

[1]  陶西平. 从只看冷冰冰的分到关注活生生的人山[J]. 上海教育, 2014(27): 1.
[2]  王爽. 基于高考制度改革的“走班制”及“个性化课表” [J]. 教学与管理, 2015(10): 74-76.
[3]  冯锦锦. 新高考背景下走班制的适切性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2020.
[4]  Du, J.N. (2012) Application of Humanism Theory in the Teaching Approach. Higher Education of Social Science, 3, 32-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.hess.1927024020120301.1593

[5]  Zhang, H., Wang, B. and Xiong, H. (2016) The Teaching Model Research of Class-Selection System for Zhejiang High School. In: editor, Ed., Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education, Atlantis Press, 129-132.
https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-16.2016.33

[6]  Gutchewsky, D.J. (2011) Senior Year Wasted? An Examination of 12th-Grade Student Course-Taking Patterns. Dissertations Theses—Gradworks.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Senior-year-wasted-An-examination-of-12th-grade-Gutchewsky/5bf734eed17054afd57f276744edaa0da538fd5d#related-papers?utm_source=direct_link
[7]  殷黎荣, 李敏. 高中选课走班: 将选择权还给学生[J]. 教育观察, 2019, 8(37): 83-84.
[8]  毕丰雄. 高中选课走班制存在的问题及对策摭探[J]. 成才之路, 2020(28): 48-49.
[9]  张煜, 单佳平. 新高考背景下“选课走班”问题研究[J]. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 41(3): 112-116.
[10]  张先锋, 李振刚. 对“选课走班制”的思考[J]. 课程教育研究, 2018(39): 121.
[11]  刘伟. 高中德育管理在学生人格塑造中的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2019.
[12]  Healy, M.A., Lancaster, J.M., Liddell, D.L. and Stewart, D.L. (2012) The Role of the Campus Professional as a Moral Mentor. New Directions for Student Services, 2012, 83-92.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20025

[13]  刘长海, 张思. 美国中学德育导师制的实践图景、理论脉络及其启示[J]. 世界教育信息, 2015, 28(6): 67-71.
[14]  王丽娟. 苏霍姆林斯基的人道主义德育思想[J]. 中小学德育, 2013(11): 17-19+7.
[15]  李春梅. 立德树人视角下高中德育管理的优化研究[J]. 教学管理与教育研究, 2020, 5(18): 19-20.
[16]  夏永庚, 朱琴. “走班制”背景下高中班主任德育工作的挑战与应对[J]. 现代基础教育研究, 2019, 33(1): 215-220.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133