全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparison-Contrast and HOTS: An Innovation in Practice

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2025.152013, PP. 178-198

Keywords: Analytical Thinking, Comparison-Contrast Essay, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking, Higher Order Skills, Rubrics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Regarded as essential in the 21st century, higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) empower students to analyze information, form well-reasoned arguments, and solve complex problems innovatively. One way to nurture these skills is the comparison-contrast (CC) essay. Effective CC essays involve a multi-step process which encompasses critical evaluation and analysis of different subjects besides the synthesis of findings, highlighting key similarities and differences in a creative, well-structured, and logical manner. Therefore, this article describes the training conducted with one group of twenty Intensive English INTE 103 (Common European Framework of Reference CEFR: B2) students at Beirut Arab University during spring 2023-2024. The training aimed to determine how the higher-order thinking skills can be integrated into the comparison-contrast essay so students employ them in their future essays. To this end, the researcher developed the analytical, critical, and creative thinking (ACC) charts with guidelines for incorporating these skills in the CC essay. Students were first introduced to the ACC skills and charts to understand how these skills are linked to the CC essay. After that, they were given a sample essay for analysis and discussion using the ACC charts, and then they were asked to create a CC essay, using all information they learned in class. Finally, students exchanged essays for evaluation and discussion using three rubrics developed by the researcher to evaluate the students’ analytical, critical, and creative thinking skills as evident in the CC essays. At the end of the training, essays were examined by the teacher using the same rubrics and the scores were discussed with students. Essay scores revealed that the majority of students passed the benchmark (60%) on all three rubrics, and more importantly, students enjoyed the experience of tackling the CC essay in a new manner through the conscious integration of their higher-order skills.

References

[1]  Alvionita, M. (2021). A Study on the Teaching Comparison Contrast Essays in Essay Writing Class. English Research and Literacy Journal, 1, 82-89.
[2]  Andrade, H. (2000). Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning. Educational Leadership, 57, 38-42.
[3]  Council of Europe (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Council of Europe.
https://www.coe.int/lang-cefr
[4]  Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding Fluency and Originality: A Latent Variable Perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003
[5]  Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). The Effects of Argument Mapping-Infused Critical Thinking Instruction on Reflective Judgement Performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 11-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.12.002
[6]  Facione, P. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
[7]  Gentner, D., & Smith, L. A. (2013). Analogical Learning and Reasoning. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (pp. 668-681). Oxford University Press.
[8]  Gupta, T., & Mishra, L. (2021). Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Shaping the Future of Students. Psychology and Education, 58, 9305-9311.
[9]  Hendrawaty, N., & Saraswati, R. (2016). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking in Essay Writing. Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching, 2016, 181-188.
[10]  Itani, G. (2024). All in One: Comparison-Contrast, Coherence and Cohesion, Bloom’s Taxonomy and CEFR. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 14, 914-947.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2024.145048
[11]  Lis, R., & Davis, J. (2012). Effective Academic Writing, The Researched Essay, Book 3. Oxford University Press.
[12]  OECD (2025). Trends Shaping Education 2025. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/ee6587fd-en
[13]  Ragab, A., & Kaid, A., & Kotby, A. (2024). Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Education: Strategies and Outcomes. The Future of Education Journal, 3, 1488-1499.
https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v3i5.267
[14]  Rosenwasser, D., & Stephen, J. (2018). Writing Analytically. Cengage Learning.
[15]  Rusmin, L., Misrahayu, Y., Pongpalilu, F., Radiansyah, R., & Dwiyanto, D. (2024). Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in the 21st Century. Join: Journal of Social Science, 1, 144-162.
https://doi.org/10.59613/svhy3576
[16]  Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., & Veldkamp, B. (2020). Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review of Critical Teacher Prerequisites for Classroom Practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Article 101602.
[17]  Sun, Y., & Hyland, K. (2013). Learning through Comparison: Analyzing the Rhetorical Construction of Compare-Contrast Essays in Different University Disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 356-371.
[18]  Van der Meijden, H., & Andriessen, J. (2014). Developing Critical Thinking through Textual Analysis: A Mixed Methods Training. Studies in Educational Research, 30, 423-455.
[19]  Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher Collaboration: A Systematic Review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
[20]  Yang, R. (2019). Writing from Different Perspectives in Argumentative Essays: Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking and Critical Literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 85-95.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133