|
|
中文阅读中语境预测性效应研究的计量分析——基于2015~2024的文献
|
Abstract:
目的：综述系统回顾汉语语境预测性影响研究结果，探讨语境多样性如何影响汉语阅读加工过程，通过分析过去10年不同实验范式、被试群体及关键测量指标，深入探讨语境预测性对汉语句子加工的影响机制，为后续研究构建系统化理论框架并提供方法论指引。方法：综述基于中文数据库和外文数据库共纳入23篇文献和29项实验，并从多角度进行归纳总结。结果：全部研究均报告了中文阅读中显著的语境预测性效应，该效应对不同阅读能力被试的影响不同。语境预测性与词频间存在一定的交互作用，且与尾字频交互作用显著。非汉语母语读者同样受中文语境预测性效应的影响。结论：综述整合了近10年关于汉语语境预测性的研究，结果表明其对阅读加工具有稳定的促进作用。未来研究应进一步拓宽研究方法和视角。
Objective: This review systematically examines the research findings on the contextual predictability effect in Chinese, exploring how contextual diversity influences the Chinese reading processing. By analyzing the different experimental paradigms, participant groups, and key measurement indices from the past decade, this paper delves into the mechanism of how contextual predictability affects sentence processing in Chinese. The aim is to build a systematic theoretical framework for future research and provide methodological guidance. Method: This review incorporates 23 articles and 29 experiments from both Chinese and foreign language databases and synthesizes the findings from multiple perspectives. Results: All studies reported significant contextual predictability effects in Chinese reading. This effect varies across readers with different reading abilities. There is an interaction between contextual predictability and word frequency, with a significant interaction with the frequency of the final word. Non-native Chinese readers are also affected by the contextual predictability effect in Chinese. Conclusion: This review integrates research on Chinese contextual predictability from the past decade, demonstrating that it has a stable facilitative effect on reading processing. Future studies should further expand research methods and perspectives.
| [1] | Clark, A. (2013) Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12000477 |
| [2] | Rayner, K. and Well, A.D. (1996) Effects of Contextual Constraint on Eye Movements in Reading: A Further Examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214555 |
| [3] | Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E.D. and Rayner, K. (2003) Modeling Eye Movements in Reading: Extensions of the E-Z Reader Model. In: Hyönä, J., Radach, R. and Deubel, H., Eds., The Mind’s Eye, Elsevier, 361-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451020-4/50021-9 |
| [4] | Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E.M. and Kliegl, R. (2005) SWIFT: A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation during Reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.777 |
| [5] | Kambe, G., Rayner, K. and Duffy, S.A. (2001) Global Context Effects on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations. Memory & Cognition, 29, 363-372. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194931 |
| [6] | Rayner, K., Reichle, E.D., Stroud, M.J., Williams, C.C. and Pollatsek, A. (2006) The Effect of Word Frequency, Word Predictability, and Font Difficulty on the Eye Movements of Young and Older Readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448 |
| [7] | Rayner, K., Slattery, T.J., Drieghe, D. and Liversedge, S.P. (2011) Eye Movements and Word Skipping during Reading: Effects of Word Length and Predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020990 |
| [8] | Taylor, W.L. (1953) “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905303000401 |
| [9] | Rayner, K. (1975) The Perceptual Span and Peripheral Cues in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5 |
| [10] | Warrington, K.L., McGowan, V.A., Paterson, K.B. and White, S.J. (2018) Effects of Aging, Word Frequency, and Text Stimulus Quality on Reading across the Adult Lifespan: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1714-1729. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000543 |
| [11] | Chow, W. and Chen, D. (2020) Predicting (In)correctly: Listeners Rapidly Use Unexpected Information to Revise Their Predictions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 1149-1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1733627 |
| [12] | Li, N., Wang, S., Mo, L. and Kliegl, R. (2018) Contextual Constraint and Preview Time Modulate the Semantic Preview Effect: Evidence from Chinese Sentence Reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310914 |
| [13] | 陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 等. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点: 眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699. |
| [14] | 徐迩嘉, 隋雪. 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 606-621. |
| [15] | 刘妮娜, 王霞, 刘志方, 等. 语境预测性对中文高低阅读技能儿童预视加工的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2019, 42(4): 848-853. |
| [16] | 刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化: 眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677. |
| [17] | Zhao, S., Li, L., Chang, M., Xu, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, J., et al. (2019) Older Adults Make Greater Use of Word Predictability in Chinese Reading. Psychology and Aging, 34, 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000382 |
| [18] | Chang, M., Hao, L., Zhao, S., Li, L., Paterson, K.B. and Wang, J. (2020) Flexible Parafoveal Encoding of Character Order Supports Word Predictability Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2793-2801. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02050-x |
| [19] | 刘妮娜, 王霞, 刘志方, 等. 词汇预测性对中文高、低阅读技能儿童眼动行为的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(6): 1369-1375. |
| [20] | 刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 等. 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响: 眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1031-1047. |
| [21] | Liu, Z., Liu, X., Tong, W. and Fu, F. (2020) Word’s Contextual Predictability and Its Character Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article No. 1833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01833 |
| [22] | Liu, Z., Tong, W. and Su, Y. (2020) Interaction Effects of Aging, Word Frequency, and Predictability on Saccade Length in Chinese Reading. PeerJ, 8, e8860. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8860 |
| [23] | 任梦雪, 田宏杰, 仝文, 等. 年老化对中文阅读眼动控制的影响: 来自词长和语境预测性效应的证据[J]. 心理学探新, 2020, 40(5): 417-424. |
| [24] | Liu, N., Wang, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K.B. and Pagán, A. (2020) Eye Movements of Developing Chinese Readers: Effects of Word Frequency and Predictability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25, 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1759074 |
| [25] | 罗雨娇, 王永胜, 何立媛, 等. 语境背景线索和词切分线索对留学生新词学习的作用: 来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 714-720. |
| [26] | 易佳琦, 刘志方, 李建峰, 等. 中国聋生阅读眼动控制特点: 词汇加工效应证据[J]. 现代特殊教育, 2021(22): 34-41+57. |
| [27] | 赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 等. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响: 眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742. |
| [28] | Zhao, S., Li, L., Chang, M., Wang, J. and Paterson, K.B. (2020) A Further Look at Ageing and Word Predictability Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence from One-Character Words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820951131 |
| [29] | 仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 等. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异: 加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456. |
| [30] | Chang, M., Zhang, K., Sun, Y., Li, S. and Wang, J. (2023) The Graded Predictive Pre-Activation in Chinese Sentence Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article ID: 1136488. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136488 |
| [31] | 张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 张志超, 等. 预测性对快速读者和慢速读者词汇加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 79-93. |
| [32] | 赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 等. 预视对阅读中语境预测性效应的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2023, 46(4): 770-778. |
| [33] | Chang, M., Pu, Z. and Wang, J. (2024) Oral Reading Promotes Predictive Processing in Chinese Sentence Reading: Eye Movement Evidence. PeerJ, 12, e18307. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18307 |
| [34] | 仝文, 朱星宇, 余雪, 等. 阅读理解与主题浏览中的预测性效应[J]. 闽南师范大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 37(4): 76-86. |
