全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

司法活动人工智能化范式研究
Research on the Paradigm of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Activities

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.114123, PP. 25-28

Keywords: 人工智能,司法公正,类案类判
Artificial Intelligence
, Judicial Impartiality, Like Cases Maxim

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

各行各业的智能化水平都在不断提高,人工智能也在逐步渗透到我国的司法活动中。科学、合理地界定人工智能的法律定义,是人工智能领域体系化立法的逻辑前提。对于“类案类判”等维度人工智能可以促进司法公正,并促进司法效率的提升。但同时人工智能也在与司法活动交叉结合的过程中产生了诸如技术的价值中立性无法真正满足公民个案公正的诉求、技术的工具性消解司法公正本意的风险。
The intelligence level of all industries is constantly improving, and artificial intelligence is gradually permeating judicial activities in our country. Scientifically and reasonably defining the legal definition of artificial intelligence is the logical prerequisite for systematic legislation in the field of artificial intelligence. In terms of dimensions such as “similar cases, similar judgments”, artificial intelligence can promote judicial fairness and also enhance judicial efficiency. However, at the same time, in the process of intersection and integration with judicial activities, artificial intelligence has also brought about risks such as the inability of the value neutrality of technology to truly meet the demands of individual case justice for citizens and the risk of the instrumental nature of technology diluting the original intention of judicial fairness.

References

[1]  李婷. 人工智能时代的司法公正: 价值效用与风险防范[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2023(1): 153-158.
[2]  陈亮, 张翔. 人工智能立法背景下人工智能的法律定义[J]. 云南社会科学, 2023(5): 163-169.
[3]  高翔. 人工智能民事司法应用的法律知识图谱构建——以要件事实型民事裁判论为基础[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2018(6): 76-79.
[4]  闫志开. 人工智能时代司法效率的理论逻辑与实践模式[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2022(2): 83-85.
[5]  陈瑞华. 论法学研究方法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2023: 105-108.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133