%0 Journal Article
%T 司法活动人工智能化范式研究
Research on the Paradigm of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Activities
%A 闫皓玥
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 25-28
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2025
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ds.2025.114123
%X 各行各业的智能化水平都在不断提高，人工智能也在逐步渗透到我国的司法活动中。科学、合理地界定人工智能的法律定义，是人工智能领域体系化立法的逻辑前提。对于“类案类判”等维度人工智能可以促进司法公正，并促进司法效率的提升。但同时人工智能也在与司法活动交叉结合的过程中产生了诸如技术的价值中立性无法真正满足公民个案公正的诉求、技术的工具性消解司法公正本意的风险。
The intelligence level of all industries is constantly improving, and artificial intelligence is gradually permeating judicial activities in our country. Scientifically and reasonably defining the legal definition of artificial intelligence is the logical prerequisite for systematic legislation in the field of artificial intelligence. In terms of dimensions such as “similar cases, similar judgments”, artificial intelligence can promote judicial fairness and also enhance judicial efficiency. However, at the same time, in the process of intersection and integration with judicial activities, artificial intelligence has also brought about risks such as the inability of the value neutrality of technology to truly meet the demands of individual case justice for citizens and the risk of the instrumental nature of technology diluting the original intention of judicial fairness.
%K 人工智能，
%K 司法公正，
%K 类案类判
Artificial Intelligence
%K Judicial Impartiality
%K Like Cases Maxim
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=110318