全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Primary School Teacher Quality and Their Preferences in the Design of a Mobile Learning Professional Development Model

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2025.163015, PP. 240-252

Keywords: Teacher Quality, Teacher Professional Development, Primary School Teachers, Mobile Leaning, Preferences in Learning Platform

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Cameroon, like most sub-Saharan countries, face the issue of teacher quality and has been trying to address it through the use of the one-shot professional development model, which has its own limitations. In an attempt to resolve this through mobile learning, the following research question was formulated: What are teachers preferences in the design of a mobile learning professional development model? The survey research design approach was used to collect data from n = 502 primary school teachers located in rural, semi-urban, and urban areas. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants were asked to rate eleven statements about how they would like a mobile learning professional development model to be designed. With the aid of SPSS Version 25, the data was analysed using frequency counts and percentages. The findings revealed that teachers perceive mobile phones for professional development as helpful in avoiding overcrowded seminars, enhancing their skills, and providing access to learning materials anytime and anywhere. They also prefer mobile learning programs related to their specific learning needs and contextual issues. The autonomous learning platform should offer opportunities for peer-to-peer mentoring, group activities, interactive multimedia content, autonomous learning, competence building, and control over their own learning. The study recommends that any mobile learning teacher professional development program should consider these options in platform and learning content design. The involvement of beneficiaries in the design process offers a greater chance of acceptances and will keep them engaged, improve their quality and contribute to quality learning outcomes.

References

[1]  Ally, M., & Wark, N. (2019). Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training. Athabasca University Press.
[2]  Baguma, R., Bagarukayo, E., & Nsengiyumva, C. (2020). ICT Integration in Education: Lessons from Rwanda. Journal of Education and Development, 4, 56-68.
[3]  Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[4]  Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. Springer Science & Business Media.
[5]  Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile Computing Devices in Higher Education: Student Perspectives on Learning with Cellphones, Smartphones & Social Media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
[6]  Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin Press.
[7]  Hsu, L., Wang, C., & Chen, M. (2021). Sustaining Mobile Learning Platforms: The Role of Training and Technical Support for Teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 567-583.
[8]  Hung, M. L., & Zhang, P. (2020). Teachers’ Adoption of Mobile Learning: A Cultural Perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 591-607
[9]  Kurt, S. (2019). Teachers’ Preferences for Personalized Professional Development in Digital Learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 15, 89-101.
[10]  Levy, A. et al. (2019). Evaluating Mobile Learning in Ghana’s Education System. African Journal of ICT Studies, 8, 34-48.
[11]  Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2017). Understanding the Factors Driving M-Learning Adoption: A Literature Review. Computers & Education, 113, 74-85.
[12]  Ministry of Basic Education (2022). Teacher Training and Professional Development Report. Government Press.
[13]  Ministry of Basic Education (2024). Statistical Year Book. Government Press.
[14]  Ministry of Economy, Planning, and Regional Development (2009). Cameroon Vision 2035: The Strategy Document for Growth and Employment. Government of Cameroon.
[15]  Ndongfack, M. N. (2015). Mastery of Active and Shared Learning Processes for Techno-Pedagogy (MASLEPT): A Model for Teacher Professional Development on Technology Integration. Creative Education, 6, 32-45.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.61003
[16]  Park, M., Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2020). Balancing Work and Learning: The Importance of Flexibility in Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8, 45-56.
[17]  Park, Y. (2011). A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 78-102.
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
[18]  PASEC (2019). PASEC 2019: Quality of Education and Learning Outcomes in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa. CONFEMEN.
[19]  Piper, B. et al. (2018). Scaling Literacy Instruction with Mobile Technology: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Education Policy, 33, 243-260.
[20]  Research Advisors (2006). Sample Size Table.
https://research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm
[21]  Sekaran, U. (2006). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley.
[22]  Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2019). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. Routledge.
[23]  Statista (2023). Number of Mobile Cellular Subscriptions per 100 Inhabitants in Cameroon from 2000 to 2023.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/640177/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-100-inhabitants-in-cameroon/
[24]  Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational Interest, Computer Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Their Impact on Student Engagement in Distance Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191-204.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
[25]  Supovich, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::aid-tea6>3.0.co;2-0
[26]  Tchombe, T. M. (2021). Teacher Education in Cameroon: Challenges and Prospects. African Journal of Education Studies, 12, 45-60.
[27]  Traxler, J. (2018). Mobile Learning: The Digital Divide Revisited. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 695-709.
[28]  UNESCO (2018). Global Education Monitoring Report: Meeting our Commitments. UNESCO Publishing.
[29]  UNESCO (2020). Mobile Learning Week 2020: Transforming Education with Technology. UNESCO Publications.
[30]  United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[31]  Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273-315.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
[32]  Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
[33]  World Bank (2019). Teacher Quality and Education Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Group.
[34]  World Bank (2021). Education Sector Analysis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Key Insights and Policy Recommendations. World Bank Group.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133