全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

刑事案件自行补充侦查机制研究
Study on the Self-Supplementary Investigation Mechanism of Criminal Cases

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.12121035, PP. 7303-7310

Keywords: 自行补充侦查,实务工作,“案–件比”,法治发展
Self-Supplementary Investigation
, Practical Work, “Case-Case Ratio”, The Rule of Law Development

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

自行补充侦查机制是法律赋予检察机关对案件补充侦查及监督的正当制度。从自行补充侦查的立法规范及相关文件的直接解读和“案–件比”案件质效评价机制的辅助解读去阐明该制度的立法初衷,基于立法初衷明了其适用应有之义以及其应达到的实施效果。以实务数据分析可以梳理出自行补充侦查机制的适用现状。从以上数据中可以较为直观的发现自行补充侦查制度在实务中具有适用的被动性、随意性、变动性较强的不足之处。因此有必要对以上不足提出相应的完善意见,通过转变适用观念、促进检警合作提升主动性;内外联动加强监督改善随意性;有序推进“案–件比”评价体系、严格执行补充侦查适用原则使得适用的变动性强、稳定性不足的形势平稳化、常态化。
The self-supplementary investigation mechanism is a legitimate system for procuratorial organs to make supplementary investigation and supervision of cases. The legislative original intention of the system is clarified from the direct interpretation of the legislative norms of self-supplementary investigation and the auxiliary interpretation of the “case-case ratio” of the evaluation mechanism of the system, based on the proper meaning of its application and the implementation effect that should be achieved. The practical data analysis can sort out the applicable status quo of the self-supplementary investigation mechanism. From the above data, it can be intuitively found that the self-supplementary investigation system has the shortcomings of applicable passivity, randomness and strong variability in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to put forward corresponding perfect opinions on the above deficiencies, and enhance the initiative by changing the application concept and promoting the police cooperation; strengthen the internal and external linkage supervision and improve the randomness; promote the “case-case ratio” evaluation system, and strictly implement the applicable principle of supplementary investigation, making the applicable situation of strong variation and insufficient stability stable and normalized.

References

[1]  龚云飞. 求真务实担当实干以检察工作现代化更好服务中国式现代化——大检察官研讨班述要[J]. 人民检察, 2023(15): 35-40.
[2]  陈朴生. 刑事诉讼法实务[M]. 台北: 台北海天印刷厂有限公司, 1980: 267.
[3]  万毅, 吕川. 检察机关自行补充侦查制度研究[J]. 人民检察, 2022, 24(16): 11-16.
[4]  林钰雄. 刑事诉讼法(上册) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005: 102-103.
[5]  金石. “案—件比”正向辐射下补充侦查制度的结构转型与发展[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022, 6(2): 162-176.
[6]  孙宪忠. “案—件比”是衡量司法办案质效的绿色GDP[J]. 人民检察, 2021, 24(6): 15-17.
[7]  金石, 郭洁璐. “案—件比”检察办案质量评价指标的功能及优化[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2022, 6(6): 154-165.
[8]  王治国, 徐盈雁. 全国四级检察机关3662个检察院已实现“六个全覆盖” [EB/OL].
https://news.jcrb.com/jxsw/201711/t20171101_5463401.html
, 2017-11-01.
[9]  傅一弘. 审查起诉阶段自行补充侦查机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 泉州: 华侨大学, 2018.
[10]  李飞. 检察机关自行补充侦查制度的再思考[J]. 中国检察官, 2020, 24(13): 37-40.
[11]  秦前红. 检察侦查权的制度逻辑与时代走向[J]. 政法论丛, 2023, 6(4): 36-48.
[12]  姚舟, 刘晓亮. 找准着力点强化重罪案件自行补充侦查工作[J]. 人民检察, 2023, 24(12): 73-74.
[13]  张智辉. 检察权研究[M]. 北京: 中国检察出版社, 2007: 21.
[14]  桂梦美, 苏志远. 补充侦查制度协同模式及其实践描画[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 6(2): 93-102.
[15]  洪春, 丁建玮, 陆秀勇. 检察机关自行补充侦查权的制度设计[J]. 人民检察, 2019, 24(10): 35-38.
[16]  卞建林, 李艳玲. 论我国补充侦查制度的发展与完善[J]. 法治现代化研究, 2021(1): 1-14.
[17]  沈善文, 张波, 李娟, 等. 提升职务犯罪案件自行补充侦查工作成效的思考[J]. 中国检察官, 2023, 24(23): 31-34.
[18]  彭辉, 卢凯鹏. 严格把关用好自行补充侦查权[J]. 人民检察, 2023, 24(19): 73-74.
[19]  谢澍. 检察机关侦查权的监督性及其体系化进路[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022, 6(3): 138-154.
[20]  宋能君, 刘蔚琳, 施雨. 刑事“案—件比”结构化运行分析[J]. 中国检察官, 2022, 24(11): 71-74.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133