|
E-Commerce Letters 2025
利率政策对我国商业银行风险承担的影响研究
|
Abstract:
2008年全球金融危机对多国经济造成深刻冲击,促使学术界探讨危机根源,金融监管部门与经济学界开始关注利率政策对商业银行风险承担的影响。在中国,商业银行作为金融体系关键部分,对经济平稳健康发展至关重要。央行利率政策直接影响银行投资决策、经营活动和风险管理能力。本文分析利率政策与商业银行风险承担,从价格型货币政策、价格型结构性货币政策及利率市场化三个维度构建框架,通过固定效应模型回归分析,发现宽松的价格型货币政策加剧风险,结构性政策缓解风险,利率市场化影响复杂,且三类政策均能有效调整资产负债规模与结构,显著影响风险承担水平。
The global financial crisis in 2008 caused a profound impact on the economies of many countries, prompting the academic community to explore the root causes of the crisis, and financial regulators and economists began to pay attention to the impact of interest rate policy on the risk-taking of commercial banks. In China, commercial banks, as a key part of the financial system, are crucial to the steady and healthy development of the economy. The interest rate policy of the central bank directly affects the bank’s investment decision, business activities and risk management ability. This paper analyzes the interest rate policy and risk-bearing of commercial banks, and constructs a framework from three dimensions: price-based monetary policy, price-based structural monetary policy and interest rate liberalization. Through the regression analysis of fixed effect model, it is found that loose price-based monetary policy aggravates risks, structural policy alleviates risks, and interest rate liberalization has complicated impacts. Moreover, the three kinds of policies can effectively adjust the scale and structure of assets and liabilities, and significantly affect the level of risk-taking.
[1] | Borio, C.E.V. and Zhu, H. (2008) Capital Regulation, Risk-Taking and Monetary Policy: A Missing Link in the Transmission Mechanism? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1334132 |
[2] | Adrian, T. and Song Shin, H. (2010) Financial Intermediaries and Monetary Economics. In: Handbook of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 601-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53238-1.00012-0 |
[3] | Dell'Ariccia, G. (2010) Monetary Policy and Bank Risk-Taking. IMF Staff Position Notes, 2010, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455253234.004 |
[4] | DellʼAriccia, G., Laeven, L. and Marquez, R. (2014) Real Interest Rates, Leverage, and Bank Risk-Taking. Journal of Economic Theory, 149, 65-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2013.06.002 |
[5] | Eichengreen, B. (2014) The ECB Tries Again. Intereconomics, 49, 239-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-014-0505-z |
[6] | 周晶, 陶士贵. 结构性货币政策对中国商业银行效率的影响——基于银行风险承担渠道的研究[J]. 中国经济问题, 2019(3): 25-39. |
[7] | 何剑, 祝林, 郑智勇. 结构性货币政策与金融机构风险——基于TVP-VAR模型的实证研究[J]. 金融发展研究, 2020(9): 3-12. |
[8] | 周友良. 结构性货币政策对商业银行金融风险承担的影响研究[J]. 西南金融, 2021(2): 13-24. |
[9] | Nier, E. and Baumann, U. (2006) Market Discipline, Disclosure and Moral Hazard in Banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15, 332-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.03.001 |
[10] | 连平. 利率市场化条件下商业银行经营发展与转型[J]. 上海金融, 2013(11): 24-31. |
[11] | 陈一洪. 利率市场化改革与城市商业银行风险——来自42家城商行面板数据模型的经验证据[J]. 金融监管研究, 2015(12): 1-15. |
[12] | 何畅. 我国商业银行资产负债结构与风险承担[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2020. |
[13] | 王祺. “双支柱”调控对商业银行盈利与风险承担的影响[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中央财经大学, 2021. |
[14] | 方意, 赵胜民, 谢晓闻. 货币政策的银行风险承担分析——兼论货币政策与宏观审慎政策协调问题[J]. 管理世界, 2012(11): 9-19+56+187. |