|
The Impact of English Writing Instruction Integrated with Automated Evaluation Systems on College English Teachers
|
Abstract:
In order to figure out the impact of automated evaluation system integration into English writing instruction on college English teachers, this study designed a semester-long experiment to explore the changes in college English teachers before and after integrating an automated evaluation system into college English writing classrooms. Qualitative and quantitative results were drawn from surveys, interviews, etc. Suggestions were also proposed for college English writing instruction as well as teacher development in the “Intelligence Plus” era.
[1] | Attali, Y. (2004). Exploring the Feedback and Revision Features of Criterion. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), San Diego. |
[2] | Bennett, R. E. (2006). Technology and Writing Assessment: Lessons Learned from the US National Assessment of Educational Progress. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. Singapore. |
[3] | Bull, J., & McKenna, C. (2004). A Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment. Routledge. |
[4] | Burstein, J., & Marcu, D. (2003). Developing Technology for Automated Evaluation of Discourse Structure in Student Essays. In M. D. Shermis, & J. C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum. |
[5] | Chen, E., & Cheng, E. (2008). Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation: Pedagogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes. Language Learning &Technology, 12, 94-112. |
[6] | Hu, X. (2015). Effects of Online Self-Correction on EFL Students’ Writing Quality. Technology. Enhanced Foreign Language Education, No. 163, 45-49. |
[7] | Li, Y. (2021). A Study of Consistency between iWrite Scoring and Human Scoring: Based on ETIC Email Writing. Beijing Foreign Studies University. |
[8] | Li, Y., & Tian, X. (2018). An Empirical Research into the Reliability of iWrite 2.0. Modern Educational Technology, No. 2, 75-80. |
[9] | Liang, M. (2011). The Development of an Automatic Scoring System for Large-Scale English Composition Exams. Higher Education Press. |
[10] | Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2018). Effects of Online Automated Writing Evaluation System on EFL Learners’ Writing Revision—An Empirical Study Based on iWrite. Foreign Language Education in China, No. 2, 67-87. |
[11] | Liu, Y., Liu, S., & Yang, J. (2022). Man-Machine Cooperative Teaching and Its Application from the Sociocultural Activity-Theory Perspective: A Case of iWrite-Assisted English Writing Instruction. China Educational Technology, No. 11, 108-116. |
[12] | McCurry, D. (2010). Can Machine Scoring Deal with Broad and Open Writing Tests as Well as Human Readers? Assessing Writing, 15, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.04.002 |
[13] | Page, E. (2003). Project Essay Grade: PEG. In M. D. Shermis, & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[14] | Rich, C. S., Harrington, H., Kim, J., & West, B. (2008). Automated Essay Scoring in State Formative and Summative Writing Assessment. Paper Presented at AERA New York City. |
[15] | Shi, X. (2012). A Tentative Study on the Validity of Online Automated Essay Scoring Used in the Teaching of EFL Writing—Exemplified by http//www.pigai.org. Modern Educational Technology, No. 10, 67-71. |
[16] | Tang, J., & Rich, C. S. (2011). Online Technology—Enhanced English Language Writing Assessment in the Chinese Classroom. Paper Presented at 2011 Annual Conference of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. |
[17] | Tang, J., & Wu, Y. (2012). A Study on an Automated Writing Assessment System Used in the College EFL Classroom. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, No. 4, 53-58. |
[18] | Wang, J., & Brown, M. S. (2007). Automated Essay Scoring versus Human Scoring: A Comparative Study. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6, 4-28. |
[19] | Wang, S. (2011). On On-Line English Writing Feedback with Writing Roadmap 2.0 Automated Evaluation System. Modern Educational Technology, No. 3, 76-81. |
[20] | Wang, Y. (2008). A Study on WRM Used in the College EFL Classroom of the Freshman Year. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the “Teaching of EFL Writing in the College”, Beijing. |
[21] | Wang, Y., & Liu, Z. (2012). A Study of Teacher Feedback on Accuracy, Fluency, Complexity and Quality of EFL Writing. Foreign Language Education, No. 6, 49-53. |
[22] | Ware, P. D., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic Feedback and Second Language Writing. In K. Hyland, & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 105-122). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524742.008 |
[23] | Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated Writing Assessment in the Classroom. Pedogogies: An International Journal, No. 3, 22-36. |
[24] | Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and Second Language Learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education. Lawrence Erlbaum. |
[25] | Wu, Y., & Tang, J. (2012). Impact of Integrating an Automated Assessment Tool into English Writing on University Teachers. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, No. 7, 3-10. |
[26] | Xie, J. (2020). Research on Construction of Teacher’s Precision Teaching Ability Model. Northeast Normal University. |
[27] | Xu, H. (2020). An Empirical Study on the Influence of Two Feedback Modes on College English Writing—Based on iWrite2.0 Writing Evaluation System. Jiangxi Normal University. |
[28] | Yang, X., & Dai, Y. (2015). An Empirical Study on College English Autonomous Writing Teaching Model Based on www.pigai.org. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, No. 3, 17-22. |
[29] | Zhou, Y. (2011). On the Application of Formative Tool in English Writing—Difficulties and Solutions. Modern Educational Technology, No. 9, 88-93. |