全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

直播售假中主播的义务与责任研究
Research on the Obligations and Responsibilities of Anchors in Live Fake Sales

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.141003, PP. 16-22

Keywords: 直播售假,主播义务与责任,广告行为
Live Fake Sales
, Obligations and Responsibilities of Anchors, Advertising

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着网络直播的普及,售假现象频发,消费者权益受损严重。本文聚焦于网络直播售假中的主播的义务与责任承担问题,首先分析了直播售假行为的两大类型:售卖不合格商品与虚假宣传,并指出直播行为的复杂性,不能简单地评价为广告行为或导购行为。主播在直播过程中需承担标识、真实、注意及配合等多项义务,确保商品质量,避免误导消费者。根据主播行为可以分为广告行为和销售行为,本文明确了销售责任与广告责任的区分。销售责任主要来自自营或明知售假行为;广告责任则因虚假宣传而产生,具体责任类型依主播在广告链中的角色而定。在责任认定时,应综合考虑主播社会影响力,确保责任公正合理。对于非营利性公益主播,也应依法承担相应责任,以保障直播市场的健康发展。
With the popularization of live streaming on the internet, the phenomenon of selling fake products has occurred frequently, severely infringing upon consumer rights. This paper focuses on the obligations and responsibilities of anchors in selling fake products during live streaming. Firstly, it analyzes two major types of fake product sales during live streaming: selling unqualified products and false propaganda, and points out the complexity of live streaming behaviors, which cannot be simply evaluated as advertising or shopping guide behaviors. Anchors need to undertake multiple obligations such as labeling, truthfulness, attention, and cooperation during live streaming to ensure product quality and avoid misleading consumers. Based on anchor behaviors, this paper clarifies the distinction between sales responsibility and advertising responsibility. Sales responsibility mainly stems from self-operated sales or the knowing sale of fake products; advertising responsibility arises from false propaganda, and the specific types of responsibility depend on the anchor’s role in the advertising chain. In identifying responsibilities, the social influence of anchors should be comprehensively considered to ensure fairness and rationality. Even for non-profit public welfare anchors, they should also bear corresponding responsibilities in accordance with the law to ensure the healthy development of the live-streaming market.

References

[1]  中国互联网络信息中心. 第54次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL].
https://www.cnnic.net.cn/NMediaFile/2024/0911/MAIN1726017626560DHICKVFSM6.pdf, 2024-09-04.
[2]  中国网络视听节目服务协会. 《中国网络视听发展研究报告(2024)》在蓉发布[EB/OL].
http://www.cnsa.cn/art/2024/3/28/art_1977_43660.html, 2024-09-04.
[3]  腾讯网. 直播购物满意度调查: 仅有一成受访者没有遇到直播购物的“坑”; 疯狂小杨哥、李佳琦等主播维权舆情突出[EB/OL].
https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20230926A0AS1V00, 2024-09-04.
[4]  刘雅婷, 李楠. 直播电商虚假宣传的法律规制[J]. 知识产权, 2021(5): 68-82.
[5]  李佳伦. 直播电商中“带货网红”主体定位与法律责任[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2020(5): 16-18.
[6]  邱燕飞. 直播带货主播法律责任要素与区分规则[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(5): 121-128.
[7]  苏海雨. 网络直播带货的法律规制[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(1): 97-104.
[8]  田恒. 国内电视购物产业发展的现状及对策[J]. 特区经济, 2009, 240(1): 227-229.
[9]  田智辉, 解益坤. 从电视购物到直播电商: 逻辑演进与未来发展[J]. 传媒, 2020(17): 15-18.
[10]  靳珺涵. 网络直播带货的案例分析及法律规制问题探讨[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2021(11): 194-196.
[11]  李红建. 网络直播带货新业态法律问题及规制[J]. 人民司法, 2024(4): 70-74
[12]  梅傲, 侯之帅. “直播+”时代电商直播的规范治理[J]. 电子政务, 2021(3): 28-37.
[13]  宋亚辉. 网络直播带货的商业模式与法律规制[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2020(8): 9-15, 27.
[14]  张俊发, 马陈龙. 数字经济视域下网络主播带货行为的法律规制[J]. 南海法学, 2024(1): 113-124.
[15]  孟雁北. 直播带货中主播商业宣传行为的规制研究[J]. 人民论坛, 2020(25): 116-119.
[16]  刘博. 基于广告代言人的视角审视带货主播的法律责任[J]. 天水行政学院学报, 2021, 22(3): 118-121.
[17]  王芳, 李靖宇. 网络直播营销行为规范化研究——以行政法规制为视角[J]. 成都行政学院学报, 2023(6): 75-85, 105, 119.
[18]  陈笑春, 唐瑞蔓. 乡村振兴语境中公益直播带货的叙事意义考察[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 42(11): 156-161.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133