全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Nature of Matter: An Inherent Element in the Interpretation of a Work of Art (Three-Dimensional)

DOI: 10.4236/adr.2024.124024, PP. 340-369

Keywords: Matter, Material, Interpretation, Impact, Meaning, Three Dimensional, Aesthetic, Conceptual, Contemporary, Symbolic, Emotional, Techniques

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the arena of contemporary culture, the interpretation of a work of art is often based more on elements such as the thought of the artist, his influential reputation, and the theme or subject (such as the title of the work) than on the simple technique used (procedure, materials, and equipment) (Bal & Bryson, 1991). However, it is essential to recognize that often overlooked techniques contain fundamental elements necessary for creating and analyzing a work of art. One crucial aspect of a piece of art is the matter (medium) from which it is made. Therefore, it is wise to consider this element for a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of the work. After an in-depth analysis of matter as a critical element in interpreting a work of art, we understand that matter, in its natural state, does not communicate directly by transmitting information. “The material is crafted through the skill of the artist”. The artwork may undergo transformation during the modelling process based on its art form. It acquires the capacity to arouse impressions and awaken sensitivities in the contemplator or the art critic (Chari, 2021). By mastering his technique, the artist manages to transcend the raw material to give it new life and a deeper meaning. By creatively manipulating the material, the artist manages to express emotions and ideas and elucidate concepts that transcend material limits to touch the soul of the contemplator. Thus, artistic technique serves as the vehicle for transforming the material into a multi-layered form of artistic expression. Through this research article, we explore how the nature of matter suggests information for the interpretation of a work of art. This is demonstrated by illustrating how the artist’s selection of materials influences the viewers’ understanding and reception of the artwork. One of this article’s critical points is that the material is not simply passive support but can have a role, a capacity to act, which influences the aesthetic and conceptual perception of the work. Thus, the choice of materials is not accidental because they transmit messages and emotions, enriching the understanding of art. Therefore, we settle on the three-dimensional work of art, which occupies space. The examples of painting given here direct our reflection towards sensitivity to the colors of materials. Our reflection on the nature of matter encourages an integrated approach to art, linking aesthetic analysis to a deep understanding of materials and their impact on the

References

[1]  Bal, M., & Bryson, N. (1991). Semiotics and Art History. The Art Bulletin, 73, 174-208.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3045790
[2]  Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227774
[3]  Bellentani, F., & Panico, M. (2016). The Meanings of Monuments and Memorials: Toward a Semiotic Approach. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 2, 28-46.
https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2016.0004
[4]  Borg, B., Dunn, M., Ang, A., & Villis, C. (2020). The Application of State-of-the-Art Technologies to Support Artwork Conservation: Literature Review. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44, 239-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.02.010
[5]  Carbajal, L., Rubio-Marcos, F., Bengochea, M. A., & Fernandez, J. F. (2007). Properties Related Phase Evolution in Porcelain Ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 27, 4065-4069.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.02.096
[6]  Chari, V. K. (2021). Aesthetic Experience: A Review. In P. S. Dwivedi (Ed.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art (pp. 33-52). Routledge India.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094401-4
[7]  Cho, J. D. (2021). A Study of Multi-Sensory Experience and Color Recognition in Visual Arts Appreciation of People with Visual Impairment. Electronics, 10, Article No. 470.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10040470
[8]  Christensen, A. P., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2023). What Kind of Impacts Can Artwork Have on Viewers? Establishing a Taxonomy for Aesthetic Impacts. British Journal of Psychology, 114, 335-351.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12623
[9]  Dafermos, M. (2024). Discussing the Concept of Crisis in Cultural-Historical Activity Research: A Dialectical Perspective. Human Arenas, 7, 273-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00289-4
[10]  Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). A Sociocultural Theory of Creativity: Bridging the Social, the Material, and the Psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24, 335-354.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020961763
[11]  Harvey, L., Tordzro, G., & Bradley, J. (2022). Beyond and Besides Language: Intercultural Communication and Creative Practice. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22, 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2049114
[12]  Hsiao, M. (2023). Environmental Consciousness on Sustainable Development in Contemporary Art Design. International Journal of Art Innovation and Development, 4, 171-179.
http://scholar-press.com/uploads/papers/IKlLISnXf0G50dsGOOMe9XaY1kJ3AcL1wugcvxJr.pdf
[13]  Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach. In The Handbook of Visual Analysis (p. 151). Sage.
[14]  Karana, E., Barati, B., & Giaccardi, E. (2020). Living Artefacts: Conceptualizing Livingness as a Material Quality in Everyday Artefacts. International Journal of Design, 14, 37-53.
https://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/files/86835985/3957_13038_4_PB.pdf
[15]  Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2009). Meanings of Materials through Sensorial Properties and Manufacturing Processes. Materials & Design, 30, 2778-2784.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.028
[16]  Krauklis, A. E., Karl, C. W., Gagani, A. I., & Jørgensen, J. K. (2021). Composite Material Recycling Technology—State-of-the-Art and Sustainable Development for the 2020s. Journal of Composites Science, 5, Article No. 28.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5010028
[17]  Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That “Design Is Making Sense (of Things)”. Design Issues, 5, 9-39.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512
[18]  Ljungberg, L. Y. (2007). Materials Selection and Design for Development of Sustainable Products. Materials & Design, 28, 466-479.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.006
[19]  Mace, M., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the Creative Process: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Creativity in the Domain of Art Making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 179-192.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1402_5
[20]  Ming, Z. X., & Saat, M. K. M. (2024). Plastic in Artistic Forms: Interpretation of Artworks Related to Plastic Crisis through Studio-Based Research. Jurnal Gendang Alam (GA), 14, 52-63.
https://doi.org/10.51200/ga.v14i1.5181
[21]  Moin Namini, S. (2005). Digital Arts in the Context of Traditional and Contemporary Creative Arts Training and Practices. PhD Thesis, Brunel University School of Arts.
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3976
[22]  O’Sullivan, S. (2001). The Aesthetics of Affect: Thinking Art beyond Representation. Angelaki, 6, 125-135.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250120087987
[23]  Özdilek, Ü. (2023). Art Value Creation and Destruction. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57, 796-839.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09748-7
[24]  Panetsos, M. N. (2024). (Im)materiality. Analysis of Conceptual and Historical Material Transformations and Implications in Collection, Conservation and Management in the Art Institutions.
http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/25926
[25]  Papachristodoulou, A. (2023). Visual Poetry in the Anthropocene: Sculpting & Materialising Language as a Social, Ecological and Feminist Gesture. PhD Thesis, University of Surrey.
https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=44SUR_INST&filePid=13186469700002346&download=true
[26]  Phillips, P. (2015). Artistic Practices and Eco Aesthetics in Post-Sustainable Worlds. In C. Crouch, N. Kaye, & J. Crouch (Eds.), An Introduction to Sustainability and Aesthetics: The Arts and Design for the Environment (pp. 55-68). Brown Walker Press.
[27]  Rahat, R., Ijaz, A., Nadeem, L., & Arif, A. (2023). Tracing the Evolution: A Historical Inquiry into the Intersection of Art and Design. Traditional Journal of Humanities, Management, and Linguistics, 2, 28-38.
[28]  Rose, G. (2022). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Mate-rials.
https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5409563&publisher=FZ7200
[29]  Rowley, L. J. (2015). Social Intervention and Visual Culture: A Psychosocial Investigation into Art Education and Young Peoples Relational Aesthetics in a Devolved Museum and Gallery Space. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University.
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/75672/
[30]  Sang, Y. (2024). Application in Environmental Art Design Practice Based on a Fuzzy Evaluation System. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 12441.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62477-2
[31]  Shanken, E. A. (2002). Art in the Information Age: Technology and Conceptual Art. Leonardo, 35, 433-438.
https://doi.org/10.1162/002409402760181259
[32]  Smith, C. S. (1970). Art, Technology, and Science: Notes on Their Historical Interaction. Technology and Culture, 11, 493-549.
https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.1970.a894042
[33]  Smith, T. (2010). The State of Art History: Contemporary Art. The Art Bulletin, 92, 366-383.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2010.10786119
[34]  Sullivan, G. (2006). Research Acts in Art Practice. Studies in Art Education, 48, 19-35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2006.11650497
[35]  Szubielska, M., & Imbir, K. (2021). The Aesthetic Experience of Critical Art: The Effects of the Context of an Art Gallery and the Way of Providing Curatorial Information. PLOS ONE, 16, e0250924.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250924
[36]  Szubielska, M., Imbir, K., & Szymańska, A. (2021). The Influence of the Physical Context and Knowledge of Artworks on the Aesthetic Experience of Interactive Installations. Current Psychology, 40, 3702-3715.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00322-w
[37]  Walters, P., & Thirkell, P. (2007). New Technologies for 3D Realization in Art and Design Practice. Artifact, 1, 232-245.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460801980016
[38]  Yonan, M. (2011). Toward a Fusion of Art History and Material Culture Studies. West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture, 18, 232-248.
https://doi.org/10.1086/662520
[39]  Zhang, Z., & Wei, P. (2024). The Beauty of Clay: Exploring Contemporary Ceramic Art as an Aesthetic Medium in Education. Comunicar, 78, 67-81.
https://doi.org/10.58262/v32i78.6
[40]  Zuo, H., Hope, T., & Jones, M. (2014). Tactile Aesthetics of Materials and Design. In E. Karana, O. Pedgley, & V. Rognoli (Eds.), Materials Experience (pp. 27-37). Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-099359-1.00003-5

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133