Pigeon peas, a type of pulse, have immense nutritional potential to improve health in arid and semi-arid regions. However, unlocking this potential relies heavily on understanding their technological properties, such as hydration rate, volumetric expansion, and cooking time. These properties directly influence processing, accessibility, and acceptability as a food source. However, there is limited information on technological properties of improved varieties. The study aimed to determine technological properties of improved pigeon pea varieties grown in Machakos County. Seven improved pigeon peas varieties namely: KARI Mbaazi 1, KARI Mbaazi 2, ICEAP 00850, KAT 60/8, Mituki, Egerton Mbaazi 1, Egerton Mbaazi 2 and ICEAP 00554 (control variety) were used in this study. These varieties were tested for water absorption capacity (WAC), volumetric expansion, density, cooking time (CT) and total soluble solids (TSS) in the broth. The experiment was arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) replicated three times. Data analysis was conducted using SAS software version 9.1.3 (SAS, 2006). Means separation was done using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) at 95% Confidence Level. There were significant differences in water absorption capacity (WAC), volumetric expansion, density, TSS, and CT among the improved varieties (p < 0.05). The control variety, ICEAP 00554, demonstrated the highest volumetric expansion before cooking (VEBC) at 64%, significantly surpassing the other varieties (p < 0.05). KARI Mbaazi 2 exhibited the greatest volumetric expansion after cooking (VEAC) at 11%. Additionally, control variety recorded the highest water absorption capacity (125.48%), which was significantly greater compared to the improved pigeon pea varieties. Cooking time in minutes was shortest for Mituki (46.0) and KAT 60/8 (55.7) and longest for both KARI Mbaazi 1 and ICEAP00850 at 160 minutes. All the varieties showed high TSS ranging from 10.5 to 26.7% indicating the potential to select varieties with desired flavour profiles. Improved pigeon pea varieties (Mituki and KAT60/8) displayed desired technological properties alongside the control variety. These findings inform the specific culinary applications and nutritional needs which enhance utilisation of pigeon peas as food. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the technological properties on the digestibility and glycaemic index of pigeon peas.
References
[1]
Varshney, R.K., Penmetsa, R.V., Dutta, S., Kulwal, P.L., Saxena, R.K., Datta, S., et al. (2009) Pigeonpea Genomics Initiative (PGI): An International Effort to Improve Crop Productivity of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Molecular Breeding, 26, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-009-9327-2
[2]
Adenekan, M.K., Fadimu, G.J., Odunmbaku, L.A. and Oke, E.K. (2017) Effect of Isolation Techniques on the Characteristics of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Protein Isolates. Food Science & Nutrition, 6, 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.539
[3]
Maninder, K., Sandhu, K.S. and Singh, N. (2007) Comparative Study of the Functional, Thermal and Pasting Properties of Flours from Different Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L.) Cultivars. Food Chemistry, 104, 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.037
[4]
Oloyo, R.A. (2004) Chemical and Nutritional Quality Changes in Germinating Seeds of Cajanus cajan L. Food Chemistry, 85, 497-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00454-5
[5]
Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V. and Sultana, R. (2010) Quality Nutrition through Pigeonpea—A Review. Health, 2, 1335-1344. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2010.211199
[6]
Tekale, S.S., Jaiwal, B.V. and Padul, M.V. (2016) Identification of Metabolites from an Active Fraction of Cajanus cajan Seeds by High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 211, 763-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.128
[7]
Tiwari, B. and Singh, N. (2015) Pulse Chemistry and Technology. Royal Society of Chemistry.
[8]
Narasimha, H.V., Ramakrishnaiah, N., Pratape, V.M. and Sasikala, V.B. (2004) Value Addition to By-Products from Dhal Milling Industry in India. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 41, 492-496.
[9]
Wood, J.A. (2016) Evaluation of Cooking Time in Pulses: A Review. Cereal Chemistry, 94, 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-05-16-0127-fi
[10]
Theologidou, G.S., Lazaridou, A., Zorić, L. and Tsialtas, I.T. (2018) Cooking Quality of Lentils Produced under Mediterranean Conditions. Crop Science, 58, 2121-2130. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.02.0129
[11]
Fasoyiro, S.B., Ajibade, S.R., Saka, J.O., Ashaye, O.A., Obatolu, V.A., Farinde, E.O. and Afolabi, O.O. (2005) Physical Characteristics and Effects of Processing Methods on Pigeon Pea Varieties. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 3, 59-61.
[12]
Ibarz, A., González, C. and Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. (2004) Kinetic Models for Water Adsorption and Cooking Time in Chickpea Soaked and Treated by High Pressure. Journal of Food Engineering, 63, 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.008
[13]
Wood, J.A. (2016) Evaluation of Cooking Time in Pulses: A Review. Cereal Chemistry, 94, 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-05-16-0127-fi
[14]
Miano, A.C., Carvalho, G.R.d., Sabadoti, V.D., Anjos, C.B.P.d., Godoy, R. and Augusto, P.E.D. (2020) Evaluating New Lines of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L.) as a Human Food Source. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44, e14517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14517
[15]
Sayar, S., Turhan, M. and Köksel, H. (2016) Expansion in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Seed during Soaking and Cooking. International Agrophysics, 30, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2015-0074
[16]
Mesquita, F.R., Corrêa, A.D., Abreu, C.M.P.d., Lima, R.A.Z. and Abreu, A.d.F.B. (2007) Linhagens de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): Composição química e digestibilidade protéica. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 31, 1114-1121. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-70542007000400026
[17]
Hoover, R. and Ratnayake, W.S. (2002) Starch Characteristics of Black Bean, Chick Pea, Lentil, Navy Bean and Pinto Bean Cultivars Grown in Canada. Food Chemistry, 78, 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00163-2
[18]
Wang, S. and Copeland, L. (2012) Effect of Alkali Treatment on Structure and Function of Pea Starch Granules. Food Chemistry, 135, 1635-1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.003
[19]
Adebowale, K.O. and Lawal, O.S. (2003) Foaming, Gelation and Electrophoretic Characteristics of Mucuna Bean (Mucuna pruriens) Protein Concentrates. Food Chemistry, 83, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(03)00086-4
[20]
Biama, P.K., Faraj, A.K., Mutungi, C.M., Osuga, I.N. and Kuruma, R.W. (2020) Nutritional and Technological Characteristics of New Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Lines and Varieties Grown in Eastern Kenya. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 11, 416-430. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2020.115030
[21]
Perina, E.F., Carvalho, C.R.L., Chiorato, A.F., Lopes, R.L.T., Gonçalves, J.G.R. and Carbonell, S.A.M. (2014) Technological Quality of Common Bean Grains Obtained in Different Growing Seasons. Bragantia, 73, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/brag.2014.008
[22]
Mukai Mughi, I. (2017) Inheritance and Characterization of Cooking Time, Seed Iron and Zinc Content in Selected African Common Bean Germplasm. Doctoral Dissertation, Makerere University.
[23]
Wang, N. and Daun, J.K. (2005) Determination of Cooking Times of Pulses Using an Automated Mattson Cooker Apparatus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85, 1631-1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2134
[24]
Kusumiyati, Hadiwijaya, Y., Putri, I.E., Mubarok, S. and Hamdani, J.S. (2020) Rapid and Non-Destructive Prediction of Total Soluble Solids of Guava Fruits at Various Storage Periods Using Handheld Near-Infrared Instrument. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 458, Article ID: 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/458/1/012022
[25]
Base, S.A.S. (2006) 9.1.3 Procedures Guide. SAS Publishing.
[26]
Carbonell, S.A.M., Carvalho, C.R.L. and Pereira, V.R. (2003) Cooking Quality Parameters of Common Bean Genotypes, Sown in Different Seasons and Locations. Bragantia, 62, 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0006-87052003000300004
[27]
Resende, O. and Corrêa, P.C. (2007) Modelagem matemática do processo de hidratação de sementes de feijão. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 29, 373-378. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.387
[28]
Teixeira, I.R., Borém, A., Araújo, G.A.d.A. and Andrade, M.J.B.d. (2005) Teores de nutrientes e qualidade fisiológica de sementes de feijão em resposta à adubação foliar com manganês e zinco. Bragantia, 64, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0006-87052005000100009
[29]
Waraich, E.A., Rashid, A. and ASraf, M.Y. (2011) Role of Mineral Nutrition in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 764-777.
[30]
Soltani, A., Walter, K.A., Wiersma, A.T., Santiago, J.P., Quiqley, M., Chitwood, D., et al. (2021) The Genetics and Physiology of Seed Dormancy, a Crucial Trait in Common Bean Domestication. BMC Plant Biology, 21, Article No. 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02837-6
[31]
Muroki, M.W., Waswa, L.M., Fungo, R., Kabwama, A. and Mahungu, S.M. (2023) Cooking Properties and Nutrient Retention of Biofortified Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Varieties: The Case of Burundi. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, Article ID: 1062978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1062978
[32]
Zhu, L., Wu, G., Cheng, L., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Qian, H., et al. (2019) Effect of Soaking and Cooking on Structure Formation of Cooked Rice through Thermal Properties, Dynamic Viscoelasticity, and Enzyme Activity. Food Chemistry, 289, 616-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.082
[33]
Singh, N. (2010) Physico-Chemical and Functional Properties of Pulse Starch. In: Tiwari, B., Gowen, A. and McKenna, B., Eds., Pulse Foods: Quality, Technology, and Nutraceutical Application, Elsevier.
[34]
Esteves, A.M., et al. (2002) Chemical and Enzymatic Comparison of Six Bean Lin-eages (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). CiênciaAgrotechnological, 26, 999-1005.
[35]
Harouna, D.V., Venkataramana, P.B., Matemu, A.O. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2019) Assessment of Water Absorption Capacity and Cooking Time of Wild Under-Exploited Vigna Species Towards Their Domestication. Agronomy, 9, Article No. 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090509
[36]
Corte, A.D., Moda-Cirino, V., Scholz, M.B.S. and Destro, D. (2003) Environment Effect on Grain Quality in Early Common Bean Cultivars and Lines. Cropp Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 3, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v03n03a03
[37]
Rodrigues, J.A., Ribeiro, N.D., Poersch, N.L., Londero, P.M.G. and Cargnelutti Filho, A. (2004) Standardization of Imbibition Time of Common Bean Grains to Evaluate Cooking Quality. Cropp Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 4, 465-471. https://doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v04n04a14
[38]
Aghkhani, M.H., Ashtiani, S.H.M., Motie, J.B. and Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. (2012) Physical Properties of Christmas Lima Bean at Different Moisture Content. International Agrophysics, 26, 341-346. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10247-012-0048-0
[39]
Buzera, A., et al. (2018) Physical and Cooking Properties of Two Varieties of Bio-Fortified Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in DR Congo. Food Science and Quality Management, 71, 1-12. https://www.iiste.org
[40]
Okpala, M.O. (2018) The Processing Characteristics of Nigerian Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nottingham.
[41]
Santos, G.G.d., Ribeiro, N.D. and Maziero, S.M. (2016) Evaluation of Common Bean Morphological Traits Identifies Grain Thickness Directly Correlated with Cooking Time. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 46, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4638191
[42]
Bibi, N., Khattak, A.B., Khattak, G.S.S., Mehmood, Z. and Ihsanullah, I. (2007) Quality and Consumers Acceptability Studies and Their Inter‐Relationship of Newly Evolved Desi Type Chickpea Genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Quality Evolution of New Chickpea Genotypes. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 42, 528-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01246.x
[43]
Proctor, J.R. and Watts, B.M. (1987) Development of a Modified Mattson Bean Cooker Procedure Based on Sensory Panel Cookability Evaluation. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, 20, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0315-5463(87)70662-2
[44]
Hsieh, H.M., Pomeranz, Y. and Swanson, B.G. (1993) Composition, Cooking Time, and Maturation of Azuki (Vigna angularis) and Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Cereal Chemistry, 69, 244-248.
[45]
Latunde-dada, G.O. (1993) Iron Contents and Some Physical Components of Twelve Cowpea Varieties. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 43, 193-197. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637489309027542
[46]
Syeunda, C.O., Anyango, J.O. and Faraj, A.K. (2019) Effect of Compositing Precooked Cowpea with Improved Malted Finger Millet on Anti-Nutrients Content and Sensory Attributes of Complementary Porridge. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 10, 1157-1178. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.109084
[47]
Farinde, E.O., Oyeyoyin, Olanipekun, T. and Olasupo, R.B. (2018) Nutritional Composition and Antinutrients Content of Raw and Processed Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus). Annals. Food Science and Technology, 19, 250-264.
[48]
Bamigboye, A.Y. and Adepoju, O.T. (2015) Effects of Processing Methods on Nutritive Values of Ekuru from Two Cultivars of Beans (Vigna unguiculata and Vigna angustifoliata). African Journal of Biotechnology, 14, 1790-1795. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2014.14393
[49]
Ratnayake, W.S. and Jackson, D.S. (2007) A New Insight into the Gelatinization Process of Native Starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 67, 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.025
[50]
Wood, J.A., Knights, E.J., Campbell, G.M. and Choct, M. (2013) Differences between Easy-and Difficult-to-Mill Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes. Part I: Broad Chemical Composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94, 1437-1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6437
[51]
Sreerama, Y.N., Sashikala, V.B. and Pratape, V.M. (2009) Expansion Properties and Ultrastructure of Legumes: Effect of Chemical and Enzyme Pre-Treatments. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 42, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.005
[52]
Narasimha, H.V. and Desikachar, H.S.R. (1978) Objective Methods for Studying Cookability of Tur Pulse (Cajanus cajan) and Factors Affecting Varietal Differences in Cooking. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 15, 47-50.
[53]
Wani, I.A., Sogi, D.S., Wani, A.A. and Gill, B.S. (2017) Physical and Cooking Characteristics of Some Indian Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.12.002
[54]
Ratkovic, S. and Pissis, P. (1997) Water Binding to Biopolymers in Different Cereals and Legumes: Proton NMR Relaxation, Dielectric and Water Imbibition Studies; Based on Sensory Panel Cookability Evaluation. Journal of Materials Science, 32, 3061-3068. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018678029109
