全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

反垄断法视角下的电商平台自我优待分析
Analysis of Self-Preferential Treatment of E-Commerce Platforms under the Perspective of Antitrust Law

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341640, PP. 4246-4252

Keywords: 反垄断法,电商平台,自我优待
Antitrust Law
, E-Commerce Platforms, Self-Preferential Treatment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

电商平台的运营模式对国民经济产生了深远影响,它们之间的跨界竞争不仅在激烈争夺消费者,还在不断拓展市场边界,而在这一过程中也滋生了竞争失序问题,这其中突出的是一些电商平台身兼经营者与管理者双重角色,频繁采取自我优待策略,以巩固自身市场地位。基于市场杠杆理论并结合实际情况分析,这种自我优待现象应受到反垄断法律框架的约束。根据我国现行《反垄断法》,对这类行为最直接的规制手段似乎是滥用市场支配地位条款。然而,自我优待与差别待遇、搭售、拒绝交易等行为虽有交集,但其复杂性意味着单纯套用滥用市场支配地位条款并不恰当。因此,需要引入合理原则,通过分类法对自我优待行为进行规制。
The mode of operation of e-commerce platforms has had a far-reaching impact on the national economy, and cross-border competition among them has not only fiercely competed for consumers but also continuously expanded market boundaries, but this process has also given rise to the problem of competitive disorder. In particular, some e-commerce platforms play the dual roles of operator and manager, and frequently adopt the strategy of self-preferential treatment in order to consolidate their market position. Based on the theory of market leverage and analyzing the actual situation, this kind of self-preferential phenomenon should be regulated by the antitrust legal framework. According to China’s current “Antimonopoly Law”, the most direct means to regulate such behavior seems to be the abuse of dominant market position clause. However, although self-preferential treatment intersects with differential treatment, tying and refusal to deal, its complexity means that it is not appropriate to simply apply the abuse of dominant position clause. Therefore, there is a need to introduce the principle of reasonableness and to regulate self-preferential behavior through a taxonomy.

References

[1]  孟雁北, 赵泽宇. 反垄断法下超级平台自我优待行为的合理规制[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(1): 70-82.
[2]  刘笑. 互联网平台自我优待反垄断规制研究[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2023(1): 51-56.
[3]  贺斯迈. 论自我优待的行为定性与治理路径[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2024, 13(1): 154-168.
[4]  孙晋, 马姗姗. 数字平台自我优待的反垄断规制困境与优化进路[J]. 法治研究, 2024(1): 139-149.
[5]  邓峰. 传导、杠杆与中国反垄断法的定位——以可口可乐并购汇源反垄断法审查案为例[J]. 中国法学, 2011(1): 179-190.
[6]  周梦懿. 数字平台自我优待:行为类型与法律规制[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(2): 79-89+119.
[7]  王业亮. 从本身违法到合理原则——数字平台自我优待的反垄断分析[J]. 数字法治, 2024(3): 193-206.
[8]  姚宜君, 陈永国. 电子商务平台自我优待行为的法律分析[J]. 河北经贸大学学报(综合版), 2022, 22(3): 42-48.
[9]  兰江华. 平台自我优待: 行为机制、经济效果和规制路径[J]. 南方金融, 2023(7): 69-82.
[10]  陈永伟. 平台的自我优待: 性质、影响和应对[J]. 竞争政策研究, 2023(5): 5-24.
[11]  高重迎, 刘陈杨. 平台自我优待的反垄断法规制路径再探[J]. 焦作大学学报, 2024, 38(1): 6-11.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133