全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

研究集权程度、双元创新与人力资源水平对于企业数字化转型的三项交互作用
A Study of Three Interactions between Centralization, Ambidexterity Innovation and Human Resource Levels on Digital Transformation of Firms

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341346, PP. 1894-1905

Keywords: 数字化转型,微观基础,集权程度,双元创新,人力资源水平
Digital Transformation
, Microfoundation, Centralization, Ambidexterity Innovation, Human Resource Level

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

对于想要在数字时代保持竞争力的组织来说,数字化转型已经成为一个关键话题。本文从微观视角探究了企业数字化转型的影响因素,分析这些驱动因素是如何相互作用的,以及它们是作为补充还是替代。通过对上市企业的调查,我们发现组织集权结构、双元创新能力与人力资源水平这些驱动因素并不像通常认为的那样具有互补性,而是相互作用。此外,组织集权程度似乎与其他两个驱动因素是替代作用,而创新能力与人力资源水平呈现互补作用,并且在高水平的双元创新能力下,分权的组织形式更能促进数字化转型的发展,这与它们单独作用的结果显然不同。这些发现从微观基础的角度为数字化转型的发生提供重要的理论见解。分析和探讨这些因素共同作用的机制,了解数字化转型相对成功的企业所具备的特征,在一定程度上,为管理者数字化转型的战略决策制定提供了新的理论基础。
Digital transformation has become a key topic for organizations that want to remain competitive in the digital age. In this paper, we explore the influencing factors of digital transformation in enterprises from a micro perspective, analyzing how these drivers interact with each other and whether they act as complements or substitutes. From a survey of listed firms, we find that the drivers of organizational centralization structure, ambidexterity innovation and human resource level are not complementary as commonly believed, but rather interact with each other. Moreover, the degree of organizational centralization seems to be a substitute for the other two drivers, while innovation capability and human resource level show complementary roles, and a decentralized form of organization is more conducive to the development of digital transformation at high levels of ambidexterity innovation, which is clearly different from the results of their individual roles. These findings provide important theoretical insights into the occurrence of digital transformation from a microfoundational perspective. Analyzing and exploring the mechanisms through which these factors work together, and understanding the characteristics of firms that have been relatively successful in digital transformation, provides, to some extent, a new theoretical basis for managers to make strategic decisions about digital transformation.

References

[1]  Lanzolla, G., Lorenz, A., Miron-Spektor, E., et al. (2020) Digital Transformation: What Is New If Any-Thing? Emerging Patterns and Management Research. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 341-350.
[2]  史宇鹏, 王阳. 营商环境与企业数字化转型: 影响表现与作用机制[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(2): 14-28.
[3]  吴非, 常曦, 任晓怡. 政府驱动型创新:财政科技支出与企业数字化转型[J]. 财政研究, 2021(1): 102-115.
[4]  余汉, 黄爽, 宋增基. 国有股权对民营企业数字化转型的影响——基于上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(3): 140-149.
[5]  刘锡禄, 陈志军, 马鹏程. 信息技术背景CEO与企业数字化转型[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(1): 134-144.
[6]  宋敬, 陈良华, 叶涛. 管理者能力与企业数字化转型: 期望落差下的“使能”创新[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(4): 23-39.
[7]  Felin, T., Foss, N.J. and Ployhart, R.E. (2015) The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 575-632.
https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651
[8]  Felin, T. and Foss, N.J. (2010) The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines, and Organizational Capabilities: The Poverty of Stimulus. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7, 231-256.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137410000214
[9]  Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2010) Beyond Collective Entities: Multilevel Research on Organizational Routines and Capabilities. Journal of Management, 37, 468-490.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310371691
[10]  柳光强, 孔高文. 高管经管教育背景与企业内部薪酬差距[J]. 会计研究, 2021(3): 110-121.
[11]  包莉丽, 何少奎, 何威风, 等. 高管团队背景特征影响企业技术创新绩效的理论分析[J]. 财会通讯, 2020(18): 9-11, 38.
[12]  Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S. and Teece, D.J. (2019) Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. California Management Review, 62, 77-94.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619885150
[13]  Roedder, N., Dauer, D., Laubis, K., Karaenke, P. and Weinhardt, C. (2016) The Digital Transformation and Smart Data Analytics: An Overview of Enabling Developments and Application Areas. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington DC, 5-8 December 2016, 2795-2802.
https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840927
[14]  Al-Alawi, A.I., Messaadia, M., Mehrotra, A., Sanosi, S.K., Elias, H. and Althawadi, A.H. (2023) Digital Transformation Adoption in Human Resources Management during COVID-19. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41, 446-461.
https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-05-2022-0069
[15]  钱晶晶, 何筠. 传统企业动态能力构建与数字化转型的机理研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(6): 135-143.
[16]  Felin, T., Foss, N.J., Heimeriks, K. and Madsen, T.L. (2012) Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Operations Research: Management Science, 53, 449-450.
[17]  Angela, V.F. (2021) People, Not Technology, Drive Digital Transformation. Talent Development, 75, 34-39.
[18]  肖土盛, 孙瑞琦, 袁淳, 等. 企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(12): 220-237.
[19]  胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?——基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 139-156.
[20]  Kimberly, J.R. (1976) Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique, and Proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 571-597.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2391717
[21]  吴育辉, 张腾, 秦利宾, 等. 高管信息技术背景与企业数字化转型[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(12): 138-157.
[22]  Nielsen, J.A., Mathiassen, L. and Hansen, A.M. (2018) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning: A Critical Application of the 4I Model. British Journal of Management, 29, 835-850.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12324
[23]  王晔, 陈洋, 崔箫. 求变还是求稳: 动态能力对企业数字化转型的影响机制研究[J]. 东岳论丛, 2022, 43(8): 88-96.
[24]  杨帆, 郑逢爽. 管理层特征、机构投资者及公司成长性[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(15): 167-170.
[25]  Eisenhardt, K.M., Furr, N.R. and Bingham, C.B. (2010) Crossroads-Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263-1273.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
[26]  周建, 许为宾, 余耀东. 制度环境、CEO权力与企业战略风格[J]. 管理学报, 2015, 12(6): 807-813.
[27]  Zimmermann, A., Hill, S.A., Birkinshaw, J. and Jaeckel, M. (2020) Complements or Substitutes? A Microfoundations Perspective on the Interplay between Drivers of Ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning, 53, Article ID: 101927.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101927
[28]  林山, 黄培伦. 组织结构特性与组织知识创新间关系的实证研究框架[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(7): 22-27.
[29]  李忆, 司有和. 组织结构、创新与企业绩效: 环境的调节作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2009, 23(4): 20-26.
[30]  Kim, H.B., Choi, S., Kim, B. and Pop-Eleches, C. (2018) The Role of Education Interventions in Improving Economic Rationality. Science, 362, 83-86.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6987
[31]  刘啟仁, 赵灿. 税收政策激励与企业人力资本升级[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(4): 70-85.
[32]  杨隽萍, 徐娜. 动态能力与高管社会资本组态效应对企业数字化转型的影响——以创业板上市公司为例[J]. 技术经济, 2023, 42(4): 97-109.
[33]  Warner, K.S.R. and Wäger, M. (2019) Building Dynamic Capabilities for Digital Transformation: An Ongoing Process of Strategic Renewal. Long Range Planning, 52, 326-349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
[34]  吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144, 110.
[35]  刘华. 企业集权度及其影响因素的定量研究[J]. 技术经济, 2007, 26(2): 24-29.
[36]  余长林, 孟祥旭. “海归”高管与中国数字产业技术创新[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2022, 62(6): 127-145, 234.
[37]  任晓怡, 苏雪莎, 常曦, 等. 中国自由贸易试验区与企业数字化转型[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(9): 130-140.
[38]  Dawson, J.F. (2013) Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
[39]  Dawson, J.F. and Richter, A.W. (2006) Probing Three-Way Interactions in Moderated Multiple Regression: Development and Application of a Slope Difference Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917-926.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917
[40]  张永珅, 李小波, 邢铭强. 企业数字化转型与审计定价[J]. 审计研究, 2021(3): 62-71.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133