|
Dispute Settlement 2024
生态环境损害赔偿与行政处罚在适用中的冲突与协调
|
Abstract:
生态损害赔偿与行政处罚的冲突并不只是理论上的空想,而是实践中真实存在。通过对二者关系进行梳理,行政处罚与生态环境损害赔偿应当是相互关联互补的关系。行政处罚带有惩戒性,具有一定的预防作用,生态环境损害赔偿具有灵活性,求偿方式更加多元。二者的协调适用能够将政府的民事索赔权与环境行政力量相结合,促进行政机关在生态环境救济方面的合作。但是在处理二者协调适用过程中,仍存在一定的冲突。主体的重叠,手段的重叠会造成赔偿义务人的责任重叠。因此需要对二者的协调适用进行全方面的分析,调和生态环境损害赔偿与既有行政处罚的关系。
The conflict between ecological damage compensation and administrative penalties is not merely theoretical but exists in practice. By examining the relationship between the two, it is evident that administrative penalties and ecological environmental damage compensation should be interrelated and complementary. Administrative penalties are punitive and have a certain preventive effect, while ecological environmental damage compensation is flexible and offers more diverse ways of seeking compensation. The coordination and integration of the two can combine the government’s civil claims with environmental administrative power, achieving coordination and cooperation of administrative agencies in ecological environmental remediation. However, there are still conflicts in the coordinated application of the two. The overlap of subjects and methods can lead to overlapping responsibilities for the liable party. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the coordinated application of the two is needed to reconcile the relationship between ecological environmental damage compensation and existing administrative penalties.
[1] | 张宝. 生态环境损害政府索赔权与监管权的适用关系辨析[J]. 法学论坛, 2017, 32(3): 14-21. |
[2] | 郝欣欣. 生态环境损害赔偿制度发展研究——以生态环境损害赔偿与环境行政处罚关系为视角[J]. 自然资源情报, 2022(1): 13-20. |
[3] | 张慧. 论行政机关在环境公益诉讼中的角色重构[J]. 法制与经济, 2020(11): 39-40. |
[4] | 曹明德. 《民法典》生态环境损害赔偿条款法理辨析[J]. 法律科学, 2022(1): 58. |
[5] | 于文轩. 环境资源与能源法评论(第5辑)生态环境法律规制的理论基础与制度建构法学理论[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2023. |
[6] | 盐城市人民政府. 关于做好行政处罚案件生态环境损害赔偿线索筛查工作的通知[Z/OL]. https://www.yancheng.gov.cn/art/2022/10/27/art_23130_3921976.html, 2022-10-27. |
[7] | 池州市生态环境局常态化开展生态环境损害赔偿工作[Z/OL]. https://sthjj.chizhou.gov.cn/News/show/575593.html, 2022-06-20. |
[8] | 绍兴市生态环境局等9部门关于印发《绍兴市资源环境案件违法责任与损害赔偿责任“一案双查”实施办法(试行)》的通知[Z/OL]. https://www.sx.gov.cn/art/2022/10/9/art_1229559240_1874242.html, 2022-10-09. |
[9] | 王斐, 朱昊. 生态环境损害赔偿制度适用范围的反思和厘定——兼论《民法典》生态环境损害赔偿条款[J]. 经济问题, 2023(9): 19-26. |
[10] | 张宝. 生态环境损害政府索赔制度的性质与定位[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(2): 78-93. |
[11] | 山东省生态环境厅. 政策解读丨《山东省实施〈生态环境损害赔偿管理规定〉细则》[Z/OL]. http://www.sdein.gov.cn/dtxx/zcjd/202403/t20240313_4712101.html, 2024-03-13. |
[12] | 朱炳成, 于文轩. 生态损害赔偿与行政处罚的衔接[J]. 中华环境, 2018(6): 26-28. |
[13] | 程多威, 王灿发. 生态环境损害赔偿制度的体系定位与完善路径[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2016(5): 81-85+143. |
[14] | 廖华. 生态环境损害赔偿的实践省思与制度走向[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2021, 50(1): 50-59. |
[15] | 程雨燕. 生态环境损害赔偿磋商制度构想[J]. 北方法学, 2017, 11(5): 81-90. |
[16] | 戴建华. 生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的制度定位与规则重构[J]. 求索, 2020(6): 126-133. |
[17] | 龚学德. 论公法制裁后环境民事公益诉讼中的重复责任[J]. 行政法学研究, 2019(5): 106-118. |