%0 Journal Article
%T 生态环境损害赔偿与行政处罚在适用中的冲突与协调<br>Conflict and Coordination in the Application of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation and Administrative Penalties
%A 蔡雨晨
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 7-14
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ds.2024.1010397
%X 生态损害赔偿与行政处罚的冲突并不只是理论上的空想&#65292;而是实践中真实存在。通过对二者关系进行梳理&#65292;行政处罚与生态环境损害赔偿应当是相互关联互补的关系。行政处罚带有惩戒性&#65292;具有一定的预防作用&#65292;生态环境损害赔偿具有灵活性&#65292;求偿方式更加多元。二者的协调适用能够将政府的民事索赔权与环境行政力量相结合&#65292;促进行政机关在生态环境救济方面的合作。但是在处理二者协调适用过程中&#65292;仍存在一定的冲突。主体的重叠&#65292;手段的重叠会造成赔偿义务人的责任重叠。因此需要对二者的协调适用进行全方面的分析&#65292;调和生态环境损害赔偿与既有行政处罚的关系。<br>The conflict between ecological damage compensation and administrative penalties is not merely theoretical but exists in practice. By examining the relationship between the two, it is evident that administrative penalties and ecological environmental damage compensation should be interrelated and complementary. Administrative penalties are punitive and have a certain preventive effect, while ecological environmental damage compensation is flexible and offers more diverse ways of seeking compensation. The coordination and integration of the two can combine the government&#8217;s civil claims with environmental administrative power, achieving coordination and cooperation of administrative agencies in ecological environmental remediation. However, there are still conflicts in the coordinated application of the two. The overlap of subjects and methods can lead to overlapping responsibilities for the liable party. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the coordinated application of the two is needed to reconcile the relationship between ecological environmental damage compensation and existing administrative penalties.
%K 生态损害赔偿&#65292
%K 行政处罚&#65292
%K 适用冲突<br>Ecological Damage Compensation
%K Administrative Penalties
%K Application Conflicts
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=97539