全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果分析
Analysis of the Application Effect of Continuous Nursing Intervention Based on the Theory of Timing in Perioperative Nursing Process in Operating Room

DOI: 10.12677/ns.2024.139185, PP. 1301-1306

Keywords: 手术室护理,时机理论,持续性护理,应用效果,手术室不良事件
Nursing in Operating Room
, Theory of Timing, Continuous Care, Application Effect, Adverse Event in Operating Room

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:研究基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果。方法:选择2019年2月~2020年1月接受手术治疗的114例患者。将其以就医先后次序的差异分作试验组及对照组各57例。对照组予以常规围术期护理,试验组则开展基于时机理论的持续性护理干预。分析两组手术室不良事件,自我感觉负担量表(SPBS)以及一般自我效能感量表(GSES)评分,自我管理能力测定量表(ESCA),护理满意度等方面的差异。结果:试验组手术室不良事件总发生率为3.51% (2/57),相较于对照组的17.54% (10/57)更低(均P < 0.05)。干预后试验组SPBS评分为(17.48 ± 2.01)分,相较于对照组的(25.23 ± 2.79)分更低,而GSES评分为(34.10 ± 2.91)分,相较于对照组(29.45 ± 2.74)分更高(均P < 0.05)。干预后试验组自护技能、自我责任、自我概念以及健康知识评分分别为(39.47 ± 2.18)分、(20.48 ± 2.52)分、(26.27 ± 3.04)分、(68.73 ± 4.25)分,相较于对照组的(30.50 ± 2.41)分、(16.20 ± 2.41)分、(22.40 ± 2.75)分、(60.59 ± 4.03)分均更高(均P < 0.05)。试验组护理总满意率为94.74% (54/57),相较于对照组的82.46% (47/57)更高(P < 0.05)。结论:基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果显著,可降低手术室不良事件发生风险,改善自我感觉负担以及自我效能感,提升自我管理能力以及护理满意度。
Objective: This paper aims to study the effect of continuous nursing intervention based on the theory of timing in perioperative nursing process in operating room. Methods: A total of 114 patients who underwent surgical treatment in hospital from February 2019 to January 2020 were selected. The patients were divided into test group (57 cases) and control group (57 cases). The control group was given routine perioperative nursing, while the experimental group was given continuous nursing intervention based on the theory of timing. The differences of adverse events in operating room, self-perceived burden scale (SPBS), general self-efficacy scale (GSES), self-management ability scale (ESCA) and nursing satisfaction between the two groups were analyzed. Results: The overall rate of adverse events in the operating room was 3.51% (2/57) in the trial group, which was lower than that of 17.54% (10/57) in the control group (all P < 0.05). After intervention, the SPBS score of the trial group was (17.48 ± 2.01), which was lower than that of the control group (25.23 ± 2.79), while the GSES score was (34.10 ± 2.91), which was higher than that of the control group (29.45.2.74) (all P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of self-care skill, self-responsibility, self-concept and health knowledge were (39.47 ± 2.18), (20.48 ± 2.52), (26.27 ± 3.04) and (68.73 ± 4.25), respectively, compared with the control group, the scores of (30.50 ± 2.41), (16.20 ± 2.41), (22.40 ± 2.75), (60.59 ± 4.03) were higher (P < 0.05). The total satisfaction rate was 94.74% (54/57) in the

References

[1]  杨晓莹, 胡蓉, 杨小香. 全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中的应用效果及患者预后改善的影响分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 43(10): 1643-1644.
[2]  Mafinejad, M.K., Ebrahimpour, F., Sayarifard, A., Shahbazi, F. and Gruppen, L. (2022) Reflection on Near-Peer Shadowing Program: Impact on Operating Room Student’s Perception of Their Future Profession. BMC Medical Education, 22, Article No. 832.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03891-w
[3]  王培红, 梁静, 程湘玮, 等. 基于时机理论的持续性护理预防产后抑郁症研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(5): 11-14.
[4]  黄佳宇, 丁如梅, 范静, 等. 基于时机理论的持续性护理在肾移植术后胰岛细胞移植患者中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2022, 19(15): 2295-2299.
[5]  洪敏, 张彩霞, 洪玲玲. 人性化护理对手术室护理中护理满意度及术后并发症影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(15): 2669-2671.
[6]  吕晓敏, 景彩娥, 李园园. 手术室护理管理中质量控制模式的应用及对护理质量的影响[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2020, 37(4): 442-445.
[7]  李霞. PDCA循环管理模式联合细节护理在普外科手术室护理管理中的应用效果[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(18): 2293-2295.
[8]  管恩玲, 陈淑萍, 何敏芝. 质量控制小组管理法在手术室护理管理中的应用效果观察[J]. 中国医刊, 2020, 55(5): 572-574.
[9]  高焕英. 手术室细节操作管理在手术室护理安全中的应用效果及满意度评价[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2019, 38(12): 1866-1868.
[10]  李雨昕, 龚存勇, 杨茜, 等. 基于时机理论的家庭管理对青少年Ⅰ型糖尿病患者家属照顾能力及其生活质量的影响[J]. 中国保健营养, 2017, 27(15): 170-172.
[11]  农术玉, 蓝苹. 时机理论护理结合调息式呼吸法对结肠镜检查患者自我管理、缓解腹胀感及心理状态的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2021, 39(14): 78-80.
[12]  王姗姗, 薛小玲. 基于时机理论的家庭护理对急性心肌梗死患者家属照顾能力及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016, 51(8): 998-1003.
[13]  鲍映雪, 孙柳君, 袁勉, 等. 失效模式与效应分析在手术室护理质量安全管理中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(12): 2110-2112.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133