%0 Journal Article %T 基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果分析
Analysis of the Application Effect of Continuous Nursing Intervention Based on the Theory of Timing in Perioperative Nursing Process in Operating Room %A 黄倩 %J Nursing Science %P 1301-1306 %@ 2168-5614 %D 2024 %I Hans Publishing %R 10.12677/ns.2024.139185 %X 目的：研究基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果。方法：选择2019年2月~2020年1月接受手术治疗的114例患者。将其以就医先后次序的差异分作试验组及对照组各57例。对照组予以常规围术期护理，试验组则开展基于时机理论的持续性护理干预。分析两组手术室不良事件，自我感觉负担量表(SPBS)以及一般自我效能感量表(GSES)评分，自我管理能力测定量表(ESCA)，护理满意度等方面的差异。结果：试验组手术室不良事件总发生率为3.51% (2/57)，相较于对照组的17.54% (10/57)更低(均P < 0.05)。干预后试验组SPBS评分为(17.48 ± 2.01)分，相较于对照组的(25.23 ± 2.79)分更低，而GSES评分为(34.10 ± 2.91)分，相较于对照组(29.45 ± 2.74)分更高(均P < 0.05)。干预后试验组自护技能、自我责任、自我概念以及健康知识评分分别为(39.47 ± 2.18)分、(20.48 ± 2.52)分、(26.27 ± 3.04)分、(68.73 ± 4.25)分，相较于对照组的(30.50 ± 2.41)分、(16.20 ± 2.41)分、(22.40 ± 2.75)分、(60.59 ± 4.03)分均更高(均P < 0.05)。试验组护理总满意率为94.74% (54/57)，相较于对照组的82.46% (47/57)更高(P < 0.05)。结论：基于时机理论的持续性护理干预在手术室围术期护理过程中的应用效果显著，可降低手术室不良事件发生风险，改善自我感觉负担以及自我效能感，提升自我管理能力以及护理满意度。
Objective: This paper aims to study the effect of continuous nursing intervention based on the theory of timing in perioperative nursing process in operating room. Methods: A total of 114 patients who underwent surgical treatment in hospital from February 2019 to January 2020 were selected. The patients were divided into test group (57 cases) and control group (57 cases). The control group was given routine perioperative nursing, while the experimental group was given continuous nursing intervention based on the theory of timing. The differences of adverse events in operating room, self-perceived burden scale (SPBS), general self-efficacy scale (GSES), self-management ability scale (ESCA) and nursing satisfaction between the two groups were analyzed. Results: The overall rate of adverse events in the operating room was 3.51% (2/57) in the trial group, which was lower than that of 17.54% (10/57) in the control group (all P < 0.05). After intervention, the SPBS score of the trial group was (17.48 ± 2.01), which was lower than that of the control group (25.23 ± 2.79), while the GSES score was (34.10 ± 2.91), which was higher than that of the control group (29.45.2.74) (all P < 0.05). After intervention, the scores of self-care skill, self-responsibility, self-concept and health knowledge were (39.47 ± 2.18), (20.48 ± 2.52), (26.27 ± 3.04) and (68.73 ± 4.25), respectively, compared with the control group, the scores of (30.50 ± 2.41), (16.20 ± 2.41), (22.40 ± 2.75), (60.59 ± 4.03) were higher (P < 0.05). The total satisfaction rate was 94.74% (54/57) in the %K 手术室护理， %K 时机理论， %K 持续性护理， %K 应用效果， %K 手术室不良事件
Nursing in Operating Room %K Theory of Timing %K Continuous Care %K Application Effect %K Adverse Event in Operating Room %U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=97313