This study focuses on assessing the dynamic behaviors of carbon SupercompositeTM laminates when subjected to high strain-rates and air blast loads, using a shock tube for testing. The investigation aims to understand the response of these advanced materials under extreme conditions, which is crucial for applications in aerospace, military, and other high-performance industries. SupercompositeTM (CZE) prepreg, made up of a 3K plain weave carbon fabric with milled carbon fibers as interlaminar reinforcements impregnated with epoxy, is used to create SupercompositeTM (CZE) laminates. A woven carbon composite (CBE) laminate was also created using 3K plain weave Carbon/Epoxy (CBE) prepreg. Both types of laminates were designed and fabricated using the autoclave process. The dynamic behaviors of CZE and CBE laminate under transverse compression loads were evaluated using a modified Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB). The study found that the 3D reinforcement with milled carbon fibers significantly affected the dynamic behavior of the CZE laminate. Stereo imaging videos, captured using two SHIMADZU high-speed video cameras in shock tube experiments, recorded the time history of back surface deflection. The plate specimens exhibited low deflections without any visible damage. The experimentally observed center point deflections of the CZE plates decayed sooner than those of the CBE laminates, indicating an improvement in damping due to the presence of 3D reinforced milled carbon fibers. This research shows that optimized utilization of milled carbon fibers as 3D reinforcement can withstand high stress in the thickness direction and higher energy absorption when subjected to impact and high strain-rate loading.
References
[1]
Hosur, M.V., Adya, M., Vaidya, U.K., Mayer, A. and Jeelani, S. (2003) Effect of Stitching and Weave Architecture on the High Strain Rate Compression Response of Affordable Woven Carbon/Epoxy Composites. Composite Structures, 59, 507-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00247-7
[2]
Hosur, M.V., Karim, M.R. and Jeelani, S. (2004) Studies on Stitched Woven S2 Glass/Epoxy Laminates under Low Velocity and Ballistic Impact Loading. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 23, 1313-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684404037048
[3]
Baucom, J.N., Zikry, M.A. and, Rajendran, A.M. (2006) Low-Velocity Impact Damage Accumulation in Woven S2-Glass Composite Systems. Composite Science and Technology, 66, 1229-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.005
[4]
Ji, C.G., Sun, B.Z., Qiu, Y.P. and Gu, B.H. (2007) Impact Damage of 3D Orthogonal Woven Composite Circular Plates. Applied Composite Materials, 14, 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-008-9050-x
[5]
Grogan, J., Tekalur, S.A., et al. (2007) Ballistic Resistance of 2D and 3D Woven Sandwich Composites. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 9, 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636207067133
[6]
Munoz, R., Seltzer, R., Sket, F., Gonzalez, C. and Llorca, J. Mechnical Characterization of 3D Woven Materials against Impact Loads. 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, 24-28 June 2012.
[7]
Kevin, R.H., Partick, X.L.C., et al. (2017) Comparison of Compression-after-Impact and Flexure-after-Impact Protocols for 2D and 3D Woven Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Composites: Part A, 101, 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.005
[8]
Ukyam, S., Mantena, R., Stoddard, D., Rajendran, A. and Moser, R. (2021) Dynamic Flexural Modulus and Low-Velocity Impact Response of SupercompositeTM Laminates with Vertical Z-Axis Milled Carbon Fiber Reinforcement. Materials Sciences and Applications, 12, 152-170. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2021.124010
[9]
https://Bostonmaterials.Co/Patents/.
[10]
Kolsky, H. (1949) An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at Very High Rates of Loading. Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section B, 62, 676-700. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302
[11]
Frew, D.J., Forrestal, M.J. and Chen, W. (2002) Pulse Shaping Techniques for Testing Brittle Materials with a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar. Experimental Mechanics, 42, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02411056