A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Commercialization of Higher Education in Hong Kong: A Case Study of the Business School Undergraduate Admissions Prospectuses
With the influence of promotion culture, the commercialization of higher education has become a trend. To further understand the impact of promotional culture on the discourse practice of universities in Hong Kong, this study uses Fairclough’s three-dimensional discourse analysis theory to conduct text analysis, discursive practice analysis, and social practice analysis of the business school undergraduate admissions prospectuses of the top 3 universities and two private universities in Hong Kong. The results show that all five universities use first-person and second-person pronouns to narrow the distance between the school and the readers. In addition, all five schools use a large number of evaluative adjectives and superlative forms to promote the quality of their education while presenting the school information, to make the higher education service more specific. The two private schools put more emphasis on the beautiful campus environment to increase their competitiveness. In terms of syntax, the prospectuses of these five schools form a generic intertext with advertising discourse. The combination of short sentences, phrases, pictures, and colors impresses readers deeply in a short time. In terms of social practice, the five schools promote their international education to cater to the tastes of the education market.
References
[1]
Askehave, I. (2007). The Impact of Marketization on Higher Education Genres—The International Student Prospectus as a Case in Point. Discourse Studies, 9, 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607082576
[2]
Ayoubi, R. M., & Massoud, H. K. (2007). The Strategy of Internationalization in Universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 329-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710749546
[3]
Brown, R. (1997). Developing Effective Overseas Partnerships: Future Lessons from Britain. Journal of International Education, 9, 12-19.
[4]
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
[5]
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society, 4, 133-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
[6]
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis. Routledge.
[7]
Frank, A. W., & Wernick, A. (1993). Promotional Culture: Advertising, Ideology and Symbolic Expression. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiensde Sociologie, 18, 93-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340844
[8]
Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. Longman.
[9]
Mazzarol, T. (1998). Critical Success Factors for International Education Marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 12, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549810220623
[10]
Pratt, S. (1991). Distributed Systems. Information and Software Technology, 33, 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-5849(91)90158-8
[11]
Shahnaz, A., & Qadir, S. A. (2022). Branding the Higher Education: Identity Construction of Universities through Logos, Mottos and Slogans. Journal of Social Science Research, 8, 48-71.
[12]
Xin, B. (2009). Intertextuality from a Critical Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 1, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2009-0016
[13]
Zhang, T. (2017). The Marketization of Higher Education Discourse: A Genre Analysis of University Website Homepages in China. Higher Education Studies, 7, 64-79. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n3p64
[14]
Zhang, Y., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). ‘Toward a Global Knowledge Enterprise’: University Websites as Portals to the Ongoing Marketization of Higher Education. Critical Discourse Studies, 10, 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813777