|
E-Commerce Letters 2024
电子商务平台知识产权恶意投诉的法律规制
|
Abstract:
“通知–删除”规则是《电子商务法》中明确规定的电子商务知识产权保护规则,该规则的设置,为知识产权权利人提供了救济渠道。但在实践当中正是由于“通知–删除”规则的不完善,使得不法分子有机可乘,通过恶意投诉来谋取不法利益、打击竞争对手。为了弥补“通知–删除”规则的不足,应当建立权利分类审查机制,对不同的知识产权采取针对化的审查模式。并且,为被投诉人提供反向行为保全这一救济途径,从而起到反恶意投诉的作用。
The “notice-delete” rule is the intellectual property protection rule of e-commerce clearly stipulated in the E-commerce Law. The setting of this rule provides a relief channel for the intellectual property right holders. But in practice, it is precisely because of the imperfect rule of “notice-delete” that criminals have an opportunity to take advantage of seeking illegal interests and fight against competitors through malicious complaints. In order to make up for the deficiency of the “notice-delete” rule, a right classification review mechanism should be established, and a targeted review mode should be adopted for different intellectual property rights. In addition, the reverse behavior preservation for the respondent is needed, so as to play the role of anti-malicious complaint.
[1] | 张斌, 唐震. 商标侵权人主观恶意的认定[J]. 人民司法, 2019(35): 4-7. |
[2] | 李梦倩. 电商平台中知识产权恶意投诉的法律规制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2022. |
[3] | 李明德. “通知删除”制度在专利侵权领域的适用: 威海嘉易烤生活家电有限公司诉永康市金仕德工贸有限公司、浙江天猫网络有限公司侵害发明专利权纠纷案[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2018, 15(7): 106-108. |
[4] | 王迁. 论“通知与移除”规则对专利领域的适用性: 兼评《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》第63条第2款[J]. 知识产权, 2016(3): 20-32, 2. |
[5] | 詹映. “通知-移除”规则在专利领域的适用性分析[J]. 法商研究, 2017, 34(6): 176-187. |
[6] | 姚志伟, 刘榕, 周立勤. 电子商务平台内经营者反向行为保全研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(6): 31-43. |
[7] | 钱颖萍. 从知识产权保护的临时禁令到行为保全制度的构建[J]. 电子知识产权, 2008(3): 33-35 51. |