全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于交叉效率DEA方法和Malmquist指数法的电商产业效率评估
Efficiency Evaluation of E-Commerce Industry Based on Cross-Efficiency DEA Method and Malmquist Index Method

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.132407, PP. 3306-3313

Keywords: 电子商务产业,效率评估,交叉效率DEA方法,Malmquist指数法
E-Commerce Industry
, Efficiency Evaluation, Cross-Efficiency DEA Method, Malmquist Index Method

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

电子商务是信息社会的产物,在降低贸易门槛和创造就业机会方面发挥了重要作用,评估其经营效率有利于该产业的健康发展。本文使用交叉效率DEA方法评估了中国30个省级电商产业在2017~2020年间的经营效率,并使用Malmquist指数法探究了效率演变情况。得到的主要结论如下:(1) 中国电商产业没有一个地区的经营效率达到1,整体上存在较大提升空间。(2) 中国电商经营效率呈现从南到北的高–低–高的分布格局。(3) 电商产业的规模收益状态处于全程非增或波动变化的地区居多。(4) 在研究期间,电商效率的平均Malmquist指数、技术变化指数和效率变化指数都呈现先进步、再倒退、最后进步的变化趋势,技术变化指数主导了Malmquist指数的变化。文章的最后提出了相应政策建议。
E-commerce is the product of the information society, playing an important role in terms of lowering trade barriers and creating employment opportunities. Evaluating its operational efficiency is conducive to the healthy development of the industry. This paper uses the cross-efficiency DEA method to evaluate the operational efficiency of 30 provincial-level e-commerce industries in China from 2017 to 2020, and uses Malmquist index method to explore the efficiency evolution. The main conclusions obtained are as follows: (1) The operational efficiency of China’s e-commerce industry has not reached 1 in any region. There is significant room for improvement overall. (2) The operational efficiency of China’s e-commerce industry displays a distribution pattern of high-low-high from north to south. (3) The scale return status of the e-commerce industry is non increasing entirely or fluctuating in most regions. (4) During the research period, the average Malmquist index, technology change index, and efficiency change index of e-commerce efficiency all display the trend of first improving, then regressing, and finally improving. The technology change index dominates the change of the Malmquist index. Corresponding policy recommendations are proposed at the end of the paper.

References

[1]  常梅, 王美强. 中国上市电商企业综合绩效研究——基于生产运营和资本运作视角[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(10): 149-160.
[2]  彭小珈, 周发明. 农村电商经营效率研究——基于消费品下行的模型分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(12): 111-118.
[3]  乔晗, 吕昊屹, 罗文超, 等. 基于两阶段关联DEA模型的社群电商效率测度与提升路径研究——以新疆社群电商企业为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(11): 64-71.
[4]  彭小珈. 中国电商行业生产效率测度及其影响因素——基于2016-2021年省域数据的DEA和面板回归模型[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(6): 61-71.
[5]  杜志平, 张盟. 跨境电商物流企业绩效评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(21): 181-184.
[6]  贾铖, 夏春萍. 信息技术视角下县域农产品电商绩效评估及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(7): 183-195.
[7]  Liu, D. and Chen, Q. (2022) A Regret Cross-Efficiency Ranking Method Considering Consensus Consistency. Expert Systems with Applications, 208, Article ID: 118192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118192
[8]  燕翔, 冯兴元. 农村中小银行的经营效率研究——基于DEA-BCC模型和DEA-Malmquist指数模型的分析[J]. 金融监管研究, 2021(11): 1-17.
[9]  吴冠雄. 基于DEA的我国纯电动汽车制造业上市公司经营绩效评价[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(1): 396-403.
[10]  Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H. and Hogan, A.J. (1986) Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 32, 73-105.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
[11]  范纪松, 童昱瑶, 高俊, 等. 陆军合成作战单元DEA-Malmquist指数模型战斗效率评估[J]. 现代防御技术, 2024(3): 1-7.
[12]  Ding, L., Lei, L., Wang, L. and Zhang, L. (2020) Assessing Industrial Circular Economy Performance and Its Dynamic Evolution: An Extended Malmquist Index Based on Cooperative Game Network DEA. Science of the Total Environment, 731, Article ID: 139001.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139001
[13]  李金秋. 电商平台发展、交通基础设施对农产品流通效率影响的实证分析[J]. 商业经济研究, 2023(20): 119-123.
[14]  郭娜, 陈惠. 京津冀地区农村电商发展效率研究——基于DEA模型的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2023(2): 170-174.
[15]  车兴龙. 乡村振兴战略背景下辽宁省农村电子商务可持续发展研究[J]. 商场现代化, 2023(21): 25-27.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133