|
|
E-Commerce Letters 2024
多个大股东对企业ESG的影响
|
Abstract:
在双碳政策背景下，企业不能只关注经济效益，需要关注企业的可持续发展，全面提升企业的ESG水平，以契合时代的发展。这篇文章选取2011年至2021年间在中国沪深A股上市的公司作为研究对象，探讨了不同的大股东如何影响其ESG的表现。据研究结果，首先，众多的大股东对公司ESG的表现产生了显著的推动效果。其次，多个大股东的影响力在企业ESG的表现上起到了调控的作用，当管理层的能力提升时，他们对企业ESG的积极影响将会减少。本文结论为提升企业ESG表现水平提供了一定的理论指导和管理启示。
In the context of dual-carbon policy, enterprises should not only pay attention to economic benefits, but also pay attention to the sustainable development of enterprises and comprehensively improve the ESG level of enterprises to meet the development of The Times. In this paper, companies listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares between 2011 and 2021 are selected as research objects to explore how different major shareholders affect their ESG performance. According to the research results, first of all, many major shareholders have a significant effect on the company’s ESG performance. Secondly, the influence of multiple major shareholders plays a regulating role in the performance of enterprise ESG. When the ability of management improves, their positive impact on enterprise ESG will be reduced. The conclusion of this paper provides some theoretical guidance and management enlightenment for improving the ESG performance level of enterprises.
| [1] | 张慧, 黄群慧. 制度压力、主导型CEO与上市公司ESG责任履行[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2022, 44(9): 74-86. https://doi.org/10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2022.09.006 |
| [2] | Bosco, B.D. and Misani, N. (2016) The Effect of Cross-Listing on the Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance of Firms. Journal of World Business, 51, 977-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.002 |
| [3] | Martins, H.C. (2022) Competition and ESG Practices in Emerging Markets: Evidence from a Difference-in-Differences Model. Finance Research Letters, 46, Article 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102371 |
| [4] | 雷雷, 张大永, 姬强. 共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 133-151. |
| [5] | 文雯, 施嘉妮, 张晓亮. 国有机构投资者能提升企业ESG表现吗——来自“国家队”持股的经验证据[J]. 金融与经济, 2023(8): 17-27 42. https://doi.org/10.19622/j.cnki.cn36-1005/f.2023.08.002 |
| [6] | Mcbrayer, G.A. (2018) Does Persistence Explain ESG Disclosure Decisions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 1074-1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1521 |
| [7] | Maury, B. and Pajuste, A. (2002) Multiple Large Shareholders and Firm Value. SSRN Electronic Journal, 29, 1813-1834. |
| [8] | 朱红军, 汪辉. “股权制衡”可以改善公司治理吗?——宏智科技股份有限公司控制权之争的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2004(10): 114-123 140. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2004.10.014 |
| [9] | Wei, F. and Zhou, L. (2020) Multiple Large Shareholders and Corporate Environmental Protection Investment: Evidence from the Chinese Listed Companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13, 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.09.001 |
| [10] | 魏锋, 陈莹莹. 多个大股东与现金股利分配研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(3): 82-96. |
| [11] | 马影, 王满, 马勇, 等. 监督还是合谋: 多个大股东与公司内部控制质量[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2019, 40(2): 83-90. https://doi.org/10. 16339/j.cnki.hdxbcjb.2019.02.012 |
| [12] | 郑鹏. 多个大股东与企业现金持有[J]. 管理现代化, 2024, 44(1): 42-51. |
| [13] | 刘洪彬, 赵运运, 覃予. 多个大股东对企业短贷长投的影响研究——基于监督效应和资源效应视角[J]. 上海金融, 2023(12): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.13910/j.cnki.shjr.2023.12.003 |
| [14] | 熊凌云, 方远, 杨李娟. 多个大股东的监督治理效应——来自企业违规的经验证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2023(11): 69-80. https://doi.org/10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.2023.11.005 |
| [15] | 孙亚东, 张莉. 高管海外背景、环保投资与ESG表现——基于建筑工程企业的实证研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2024(6): 42-47. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2024.06.021 |
| [16] | 王群勇, 孟雅婧, 庞瑞芝. 企业ESG表现对供应链网络地位影响研究: 路径检验与机制分析[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2024(4): 36-55. https://doi.org/10.19559/j.cnki.12-1387.2024.04.003, 2024-03-23. |
| [17] | 邓楚瑶, 林志军, 张启迪. 机构投资者持股会影响企业ESG表现吗?——来自中国上市公司的证据[J/OL]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1542.n.20240320.1618.004.html, 2024-03-23. |
| [18] | 罗宏, 黄婉. 多个大股东并存对高管机会主义减持的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(8): 163-178. https://doi.org/10. 19744/j. cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0125 |
| [19] | 潘玉坤, 郭萌萌. 空气污染压力下的企业ESG表现[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(7): 112-132. https://doi.org/10. 13653/j. cnki.jqte.20230517.003 |
| [20] | Demerjian, P.R., Lev, B., Lewis, M.F. and McVay, S.E. (2013) Managerial Ability and Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review, 88, 463-498. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50318 |
