全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Fama五因子模型在中国上证50成分股适用性的实证研究
An Empirical Study on the Applicability of the FAMA Five-Factor Model to the SSE 50 Constituent Stocks in China

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.132317, PP. 2589-2598

Keywords: 上证50,Fama五因子模型,盈利因子,投资因子
SSE 50
, Fama Five-Factor Model, Profitability Factor, Investment Factor

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文依据Fama-French (2015)最新提出的五因子模型,选取我国上证50成分股公司2015年1月至2022年12月的月度收益率数据进行实证检验。结果表明,使用五因子模型对上证50成分股的分析比使用三因子模型具有更好的解释能力,同时发现其存在规模效应、账面市值比效应、盈利效应和投资效应都较为显著。虽然五因子模型对样本具有较明显的适用性,但是其解释能力仍然有限,需要我国加强对上证50成分股公司的信息披露、提高投资主体的素质、加强监管以提高定价效率。研究结果不仅能够丰富完善资产定价模型的理论体系,而且能够根据实证结果分析上证50成分股的收益率的影响因素,帮助投资者制定科学合理的投资策略。
This study conducts an empirical examination based on the latest Fama-French (2015) five-factor model, utilizing monthly return data from January 2015 to December 2022 for companies listed on China’s SSE 50 Index. The results indicate that the five-factor model exhibits better explanatory power for analyzing SSE 50 Index constituents compared to the three-factor model. Significant effects are observed in size, book-to-market ratio, profitability, and investment factors. While the five-factor model demonstrates notable applicability to the sample, its explanatory power remains limited, emphasizing the need for China to enhance information disclosure, improve the quality of investment entities, and strengthen regulatory measures to enhance pricing efficiency for SSE 50 Index constituents. The research findings not only contribute to enriching the theoretical framework of asset pricing models but also provide insights into the factors influencing the returns of SSE 50 Index constituents, assisting investors in formulating scientifically rational investment strategies.

References

[1]  Fama, F.E. and French, R.K. (2015) A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
[2]  Fama, F.E. and French, R.K. (2017) International Tests of a Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 441-463.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.004
[3]  Leite, L.A., Klotzle, C.M., Pinto, F.C.A., et al. (2018) Size, Value, Profitability, and Investment: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Emerging Markets Review, 36, 45-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2018.04.006
[4]  陈浪南, 屈文洲. 资本资产定价模型的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2000(4): 26-34.
[5]  吴世农, 许年行. 资产的理性定价模型和非理性定价模型的比较研究——基于中国股市的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2004(6): 105-116.
[6]  毛小元, 陈梦根, 杨云红. 配股对股票长期收益的影响: 基于改进三因子模型的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2008(5): 114-129.
[7]  周芳, 张维. 中国股票市场流动性风险溢价研究[J]. 金融研究, 2011(5): 194-206.
[8]  高春亭, 周孝华. 公司盈利、投资与资产定价: 基于中国股市的实证[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(4): 25-33.
[9]  李志冰, 杨光艺, 冯永昌, 等. Fama-French五因子模型在中国股票市场的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017(6): 191-206.
[10]  崔欣, 林煜恩, 姚守宇. “经济政策的不确定性”暴露与股价暴跌风险[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2018, 33(4): 98-108.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133