|
E-Commerce Letters 2024
研发投入、代理成本和企业风险
|
Abstract:
文章选取2013~2022年中国上市公司年度数据,采用面板回归模型,实证探究了研发投入对企业风险的影响及其作用机制。研究表明:(1) 研发投入与企业风险之间存在显著的U型关系,这意味着研发投入对企业风险的促进与抑制作用同时存在于企业的研发活动之中,随着研发投入的增加,研发投入对企业风险的影响由抑制作用转为促进作用。(2) 机制检验表明,研发投入主要通过影响代理成本进而影响企业风险,一定程度的研发投入会缓解代理问题,而过多的研发投入会增加管理层机会主义行为,使得股东与管理层之间的代理成本增加。(3) 进一步分析表明,研发投入和企业风险之间的U型关系在高新技术企业中表现的更加明显,且其拐点出现的更早。本文的研究揭示了研发投入对企业风险的内在作用机制,丰富了企业研发投入和企业风险关系的相关研究,为企业研发投入决策的制定提供了重要的理论依据。
This article selects annual data of Chinese listed companies from 2013 to 2022 and uses a panel regression model to empirically explore the impact and mechanism of R&D investment on corporate risk. Research has shown that: (1) There is a significant U-shaped relationship between R&D investment and corporate risk, which means that both the promoting and inhibitory effects of R&D investment on corporate risk exist in the R&D activities of enterprises. As R&D investment increases, the impact of R&D investment on corporate risk shifts from inhibitory to promoting. (2) Mechanism testing shows that R&D investment mainly affects enterprise risks by affecting agency costs. A certain degree of R&D investment can alleviate agency problems, while excessive R&D investment can increase management opportunistic behavior, leading to an increase in agency costs between shareholders and management. (3) Further analysis shows that the U-shaped relationship between R&D investment and enterprise risk is more pronounced in high-tech enterprises, and its inflection point appears earlier. This study reveals the inherent mechanism of R&D investment on corporate risk, enriches the relevant research on the relationship between R&D investment and corporate risk, and provides important theoretical basis for the formulation of R&D investment decisions in enterprises.
[1] | 张治河, 许珂, 李鹏. 创新投入的延迟效应与创新风险成因分析[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(5): 10-20. |
[2] | 徐飞. 银行信贷与企业创新困境[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(1): 119-136. |
[3] | 毛其淋, 许家云. 政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响——基于补贴强度“适度区间”的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(6): 94-107. |
[4] | 陈彩云, 汤湘希. 创新投入、税收规避与企业风险[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2019, 39(11): 14-33. |
[5] | 刘睿智, 张鲁秀. 企业声誉、研发投入与企业绩效[J]. 财经问题研究, 2018(8): 105-111. |
[6] | 孙艳梅, 郭敏, 方梦然. 企业创新投资?风险承担与股价崩盘风险[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12): 144-154. |
[7] | 李卓, 蒋银娟. 研发创新抑制波动机制分析——基于企业生产供给波动视角[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2016(6): 72-87. |
[8] | 郝清民. 融资约束下的研发与长期财务风险[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10): 54-62. |
[9] | 张昌兵, 余梅丽, 华丽香, 王子敏. 研发投入对战略性新兴产业企业财务风险的影响——基于融资结构门限回归模型的实证检验[J]. 工业技术经济, 2022, 41(3): 124-135. |
[10] | 卢锐. 企业创新投资与高管薪酬业绩敏感性[J]. 会计研究, 2014(10): 36-42 96. |
[11] | 周铭山, 张倩倩, 杨丹. 创业板上市公司创新投入与市场表现: 基于公司内外部的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(11): 135-149. |
[12] | 秦海林, 孙疆奥. 去杠杆政策降低公司财务风险了吗?——基于股权集中度的分析视角[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2022, 19(1): 69-79. |
[13] | 于建玲, 佟孟华, 朱泽君. 企业金融化对财务风险的影响——基于经济政策不确定性的调节效应研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2021(10): 88-96. |
[14] | 杨筝, 刘放. 股票期权激励了企业高管吗?——基于技术创新的实证考察[J]. 财会通讯, 2017(15): 65-71. |
[15] | 余明桂, 李文贵, 潘红波. 民营化、产权保护与企业风险承担[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(9): 112-124. |
[16] | 李寿喜. 产权、代理成本和代理效率[J]. 经济研究, 2007(1): 102-113. |
[17] | Haans, R.F.J., Pieters, C. and He, Z.L. (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and Testing U-and Inverted U-Shaped Relationships in Strategy Research. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1177-1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399 |