|
E-Commerce Letters 2024
电商平台服务合同免责条款探究
|
Abstract:
为提高交易效率,节省交易成本。许多电商平台会事先在与用户缔结的服务合同中设置免责条款,从而使得电商平台能够侵犯用户的合法权益,逃避部分责任。通过对服务合同中的免责条款进行评析会发现,免责条款本身存在着问题,是否有效还需结合形式要件和实质要件进行判定。而免责条款之所以存在问题,是由于内部原因以及外部原因所导致。通过分析问题成因,进一步提出通过细化审查标准、明确分类规范和增设平台义务来有效规制免责条款。
In order to improve transaction efficiency and save transaction costs. Many e-commerce platforms will set up exemption clauses in the service contracts concluded with users in advance, so that the e-commerce platform can infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of users and evade part of the liability. Through the evaluation of the exemption clause in the service contract, it will be found that there are problems in the exemption clause itself, and whether it is valid needs to be determined in combination with the formal and substantive requirements. The reason why the disclaimer is problematic is due to internal reasons as well as external reasons. By analyzing the causes of the problem, it is further proposed to effectively regulate the exemption clause by refining the review standards, clarifying the classification norms, and adding platform obligations.
[1] | 黄东东, 喻柳. 电子商务平台服务合同免责条款的法律规制——基于文本与案例的实证研究[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 34(3): 46-56. |
[2] | 宁红丽. 无偿合同: 民法学与社会学之维[J]. 政法论坛, 2012, 30(1): 106-116. |
[3] | 承上. 互联网领域免费行为的反垄断规制——以消费者注意力成本与个人信息成本为视角[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2016(3): 81-86. |
[4] | 陈玉梅, 杜政辰. 网络服务平台单方变更权的法律规制——以爱奇艺超前点播案为例[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 25(1): 107-114. |
[5] | 胡安琪, 李明发. 网络消费格式管辖条款三维规制体系论: 方式、对象及逻辑顺位[J]. 河北法学, 2020, 38(11): 102-117. |
[6] | 陈泓邑, 庞聪. 化解知情同意模式之争从公平原则分析[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2021, 37(6): 59-64. |
[7] | 张新宝. 互联网时代下个人信息保护的双重模式[J]. 中国信用, 2018(5): 100-102. |
[8] | 金善明. 电商平台自治规制体系的反思与重构——基于《电子商务法》第35条规定的分析[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(3): 41-52. |
[9] | 应飞虎. 论经济法视野中的弱势群体——以消费者等为对象的考察[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学?人文科学?社会科学版), 2007(3): 67-74. |
[10] | 周樨平. 电子商务平台的安全保障义务及其法律责任[J]. 学术研究, 2019(6): 66-73. |