|
电子公告送达的推送式路径研究
|
Abstract:
早在2010年前后,我国就在火车购票、手机电信等领域推广实名认证,至今已取得极大成效。实名制在网络信息技术日新月异,涉及人数不断增加的当下,对网络安全、用户身份认证、打击犯罪等发挥重要作用。公告送达作为送达程序的最后手段,也应顺应时代发展需要不断完善。电子推送式公告送达是电子公告的衍生形式,通过互联网将公告消息推送至受送达人近期活跃的实名网信账号的特殊公告送达方式。这种公告送达,主要汲取我国互联网法院对依职权调取受送达人活跃实名账号进行电子送达的电信化基因,依托“互联网 实名制”与智慧法院平台实现更精准的“公告”,将传统公告送达与现代信息技术逐步融合,以至于能更好地保障受送达人程序权益以及从制度层面疏解“送达难”。
As early as around 2010, China has been promoting real-name authentication in areas such as train ticketing and cellular telecommunications, and has achieved great results so far. Real-name system in the network information technology is rapidly changing, involving the number of people continuing to increase at the present time, network security, user identity authentication, anti-crime play an important role. As the last resort of the service of process, the announcement should also be improved in line with the needs of the times. Electronic push-type announcement service is a derivative form of electronic announcement, a special announcement service method that pushes the announcement message through the Internet to the recently active real-name netmail account of the person to be served. This kind of announcement service, mainly draws on China’s Internet court on ex officio access to the served person active real name account for electronic service of the telecommunication gene, relying on the “Internet real name system” and the intelligent court platform to achieve a more accurate “announcement”, will be the traditional It is a gradual integration of the traditional bulletin service and modern information technology, so as to better protect the procedural rights and interests of the person to be served as well as to solve the “difficulty of service” from the system level.
[1] | 廖永安. 在理想与现实之间: 对我国民事送达制度改革的再思考[J]. 中国法学, 2010(4): 175-191. |
[2] | 陈刚, 主编. 中国民事诉讼法制百年进程(清末时期第二卷) [M]. 北京: 中国法治出版社, 2004: 123-127. |
[3] | 北京互联网法院课题组, 张雯, 颜君. “互联网 ”背景下电子送达制度的重构——立足互联网法院电子送达的最新实践[J]. 法律适用, 2019(23): 20-28. |
[4] | 廖永安. 在理想与现实之间: 对我国民事送达制度改革的再思考[J]. 中国法学, 2010(4): 175-191. |
[5] | 黄良友, 文庭婷. 网上公告送达制度研究[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 34(1): 114-119. |
[6] | 沈德咏, 主编. 最高人民法院《民事诉讼法司法解释》理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2015: 422. |
[7] | 廖永安, 胡军辉. 试论我国民事公告送达制度的改革与完善[J]. 太平洋学报, 2007(11): 1-8. |
[8] | 王福华. 电子诉讼制度构建的法律基础[J]. 法学研究, 2016, 38(6): 88-106. |
[9] | 周翠. 电子送达与电子提交比较研究[J]. 环球法律评论, 2023, 45(4): 21-38. |
[10] | 周翠. 德国司法的电子应用方式改革[J]. 环球法律评论, 2016, 38(1): 98-114. |
[11] | Wilke, F.M. (2021) Die Model European Rules of Civil Procedure: Ein Vorschlag für einheitliche Regeln für Zivilprozesse in Europa. Europ?ische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 5, 187-193. |